Evidently, this is a 230-year old ritual that symbolizes some marriage between two tribes. Before I read the link, was thinking either along the liens of David Icke's "Reptilians" or that it was some satirical mockery of people who have redefined marriage so that it's no longer between a man and a woman. Heck, why can't you "marry" an animal then?
Dr. Peter Singer, Endowed Chair of Ethics at Princeton, has been pushing this perversion for decades.
In an article published in the online magazine,
Nerve, the philosopher takes the speciesism idea to its logical extreme and argues that there is no rational reason to deplore sɛҳuąƖ relations between human beings and non-human animals. The condemnation of inter-species sɛҳuąƖity, according to Singer, is just another example of a speciesist distinction.
In reviewing Midas Dekker’s book,
Dearest Pet: On Bestiality, Singer explicitly defends the morality of inter-species sex. First, Singer argues that although the origin of the taboo against bestiality probably originated in the general taboos on non-reproductive sex (a questionable hypothesis in my opinion), this doesn’t explain the basic revulsion that most people have toward the practice. “But the vehemence with which this prohibition continues to be held,” Singer writes, “its persistence while other non-reproductive sɛҳuąƖ acts have become acceptable, suggests that there is another powerful force at work: our desire to differentiate ourselves, erotically and in every other way, from animals.”
In other words, the bestiality taboo is just another way that human beings reinforce speciesism and cast themselves as completely separate and distinct from the rest of the animal kingdom.
https://brian.carnell.com/articles/2001/peter-singer-offers-moral-justification-for-bestiality/
Topic: Mayor in Mexico marries a reptile (Read 1368 times)