Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Martha Coakley Attacks Pro-Life Catholics: "Don't Work in an Emergency Room  (Read 1347 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline juliee

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Reputation: +10/-0
  • Gender: Female
Martha Coakley Attacks Pro-Life Catholics: "Don't Work in an Emergency Room"

Boston, MA -- Massachusetts Senate candidate Martha Coakley is coming under fire today for comments showing her attacking the conscience rights of pro-life Catholics. In a Thursday interview, Coakley is asked whether doctors and nurses working in a hospital emergency room have religious freedom.
 
http://www.lifenews.com/state4728.html


Offline Petertherock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Reputation: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Scott Brown the Republican is a disaster from the pro life prospective. His comment was that abortion should be between a woman and her doctor but we need to reduce the number of abortions, but that being said, he is firmly against partial birth abortion and in favor of parental consent laws which Coakley is the opposite.

This is one of these times when it is permissible to vote the lesser of two evils and of course that would be Scott Brown. Brown has vowed to kill the health care bill which that in itself would save millions and millions of babies.

I will add that since I am living in Maine and can't vote for Brown, I was considering giving him some money, but I will not give money to a pro abortion politician.



 


Offline littlerose

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 351
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
This touches me so close to the heart!  Massachusetts handed all pregnant women over to the abortionists years ago, by requiring us to go to clinics outside the hospitals that handed women forms to "terminate" in advance of getting prenatal care.

In 1994 I went to a meeting between women who had natural miscarriages and were being treated punitively by the Berkshire Medical Center if they requested any kind of closure: Baptism, medical examination for birth defects, etc.

One woman was forced to have her miscarriage at home because the doctor on call did not want to leave a party. The woman made the call to the hospital as appropriate when the miscarriage started, and when the doctor called back and told the woman the hospital would not look at her she did not know this was unauthorized. She was both Catholic and aware enough to attempt to preserve the fetusses (twins) to allow for a diagnosis of the disorder as well as to allow for a Baptism. The doctor angrily accused her of filth for touching old tissues, berated her while she was in the midst of the miscarriage, and denied her access to emergency help should the copious bleeding that accompanies a miscarriage become life-threatening.  There were half a dozen people at that meeting, and several women told similar stories of being verbally abused for using the word "baby" and for trying to find out why they were having miscarriages.

The Catholic Church did nothing to protect these women, who included Catholics. The woman with the twins was Catholic and had to rely on an old priest personally choosing to offer a Mass for her babies while the Catholic Church turned its back completely on these women. It turned out that they could have had a very strong case against the mistreatment of the  women with desired and supported pregnancies. It turned out that the reason for the refusal of Berkshire Medical Center to allow miscarriages to be treated normally was not only violating federal standards for tracking disease but was the direfct result of pressure from GE to hide the PCB spill that had been going on continuously for 15 years by that time. The pattern of certain types of birth defects resulted in a 25% miscarriage rate for that county.

The Catholic Church was supporting the establishment of womens' centers and the nuns were working with these womens centers to prevent accurate statistics about miscarriages by deliberately punishing women for attempting to treat fetal deaths as seriously as other deaths. GE needed the womens' centers and the abortionists to help keep the birth-defect pattern from showing up at the CDC and flagging the PCB spill that was also causing adult cancers.

Massachusetts is the home of the genocidal church, the Unitarians, who controlled the ecuмenical "Interfsaith" groups at that time and the Catholics supported them, (they are still among the most horrific genocdal groups, supporting the murder of live ozegen-breathing infants aborted at term!) and also the home of several other z-p-g cults that are genocidal. The archbishop there, Sean O'Malley, is right now being accused of initiating euthanasia against elderly priests in his diocese.

The Cahtolic Church in Pittsfield, those parishes, delieberately turned a blind eye to what the women were experiencing because they would not help at all, except for the one elderly priest who was only willing to secretly say a Mass for the infants' souls. Even now as I write this, I am fully aware that one of the worst pro-abortion activists who attacked one of the women at that meeting is strumming her guitar at folk masses.

This is all well docuмented. The manager at berkshire Medical Center was fired right after those meetings for calling for an investigation of the abuse by ER/prenatal doctors of women who were trying to bear children. The "Superfund" fight with GE over the poisoning of the Housatonic Watershed featured a prominent nun-activist who would go to stockholders' meetings and make big fat speeches against the evil capitalists, but would she help her Catholic sisters facing GE? No! She refused to introduce the horrible abuse into her speeches, because she knew the next question would be: why didn't those parish priests and their bishops speak up?

We Catholics need to force the parishes to accountability for their failure to support Catholic personnel as well as their failure to support Catholic mothers. We need to be willing to tell the prolife men to shut up long enough to get the care required by women who are not trying to have abortions in the first place.

The Catholic Pro-Lifers are responsible for this. The women experiencing miscarriages were DIRECTED TO THE RACHEL PROJECT AS IF THEY HAD SOUGHT ABORTIONS!!!!!

THE FILTHY BASTARDS CALLING THEMSELVES "PROLIFE" ARE RIGHT IN THERE WITH THE MURDERING DOCTORS, ATTACKING WOMEN WHO TRY TO PRESERVE THEIR PREGNANCY TO TERM!

The Massachusetts Catholics are among the LEADERS of the genocide party, the Democrats, in the USA.

The Massachusetts Bishops are all guilty of participation in the genocide of the innocent children and the attacks on innocent young mothers alongside their guilt for supporting the pedophiles (and these crimes are all connected in their dark damned souls).

There is no escaping the fact that the filth that comes out of Boston is nothing related to the Catholic faith.  The horrors in the ER started for the most part in that very Catholic city.

Traditional Catholics were run out of those parishes and those hospitals years ago.  The Franciscans were at the center of that, and still are.

If you want to fix the problems in the hospitals, you are going to have to start with the bloody bishop Sean O'Malley and the bloody Franciscan hospitals.


Offline Petertherock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Reputation: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
You are from my neck of the woods. I grew up in North Adams, MA. While my dad worked at North Adams Regional Hospital there was a nun there, Sister Rose Flanagan, who was an out and out nasty person to work for. My dad finally was able to help get rid of her by telling her he was going to call her order and report her for being president of the nurses association at a hospital where abortions are performed. Her order removed her after that.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 41868
  • Reputation: +23920/-4344
  • Gender: Male
Please, for your sake, don't get me started on "lesser of two evils" voting.  That principle represents utilitarian/Protestant ends-justifies-the-means moral reasoning.  You never do evil to prevent greater evil.


Offline littlerose

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 351
  • Reputation: +0/-0
  • Gender: Male
Quote from: Petertherock
You are from my neck of the woods. I grew up in North Adams, MA. While my dad worked at North Adams Regional Hospital there was a nun there, Sister Rose Flanagan, who was an out and out nasty person to work for. My dad finally was able to help get rid of her by telling her he was going to call her order and report her for being president of the nurses association at a hospital where abortions are performed. Her order removed her after that.



Remember the boy Lewis Lent killed, James Bernardo? I consider him a catholic Martyr. Lent was focussing on such children, and that is why he was being protected in that county. Did you notice that onfce in prison he hooked up with writing letters on behalf of imprisoned pedo-priests, after he was arrested while trying to abduct a Catholic girl from the same parochial school as little James?

It was during that whole period that so much was coming to light and the girls in the Pittsfield high schools were being driven to late-term abortion clinics in secret, and also in violation of the laws at that time. The Pittsfield police included detectives, Catholic detectives, who wanted to arrest and prosecute, but they got NO help from the Church which certainly could have shielded them while they did their job, even if the Church protected its own priests in the process, there was so much going on! It was horrible.

Every politician up there is either Irish or Italian Catholic and that is Massachusetts for you. Those parishes were among the first to "go Novo" and that certainly tells us something about the nature of the Beast that has been swallowing our beloved Church.

I have to agree with Ladislaus, to vote for anyone who is part of that mess up there on "Lesser of Evils" grounds is like suggesting the hangman use a less scratchy fiber for the rope.

Offline Belloc

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6600
  • Reputation: +615/-5
  • Gender: Male
Quote from: Ladislaus
Please, for your sake, don't get me started on "lesser of two evils" voting.  That principle represents utilitarian/Protestant ends-justifies-the-means moral reasoning.  You never do evil to prevent greater evil.


well stated and a view held by some Calvinists, such as Peroutka and Lofton.....sadly, people think they have to "stop" someone or have to even vote at times....."trust in jesus" is a slogan, except in the ballot box, then it is triangulation, stats,etc....paranoia....
Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

Offline Caraffa

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 989
  • Reputation: +558/-47
  • Gender: Male
Quote from: Petertherock
Scott Brown the Republican is a disaster from the pro life prospective. His comment was that abortion should be between a woman and her doctor but we need to reduce the number of abortions, but that being said, he is firmly against partial birth abortion and in favor of parental consent laws which Coakley is the opposite.


I know a little about Mass. politics, is Brown a Weld Republican?

Quote from: littlerose
Every politician up there is either Irish or Italian Catholic and that is Massachusetts for you. Those parishes were among the first to "go Novo"


Such folks are the logic conclusion of where Americanism leads. They care more about ethnic identity than the Catholic faith to which they claim to belong, but don't.
Pray for me, always.


Offline Catholic Samurai

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2821
  • Reputation: +744/-14
  • Gender: Male
Quote from: Caraffa

Quote from: littlerose
Every politician up there is either Irish or Italian Catholic and that is Massachusetts for you. Those parishes were among the first to "go Novo"


Such folks are the logic conclusion of where Americanism leads. They care more about ethnic identity than the Catholic faith to which they claim to belong, but don't.


If they gave a d*** about their cultural identity they would be Traditionalists. They are more concerned about being American than Catholic.
"Louvada Siesa O' Sanctisimo Sacramento!"~warcry of the Amakusa/Shimabara rebels

"We must risk something for God!"~Hernan Cortes


TEJANO AND PROUD!

Offline Petertherock

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 673
  • Reputation: +0/-1
  • Gender: Male
    • h
I think we all would agree that a "Catholic" party would be the best thing that could happen for this country. But I think we all agree that it's not going to happen, especially since we can't even get a "Catholic" Vatican.

However, with Brown's election, it will most likely kill Obama's abortion bill (Health care abortion bill) which will thus save millions and millions of babies. It will also slow down Obama's communist agenda which will benefit the whole country. So yes, in this case, since there is no "perfect candidate" (is there ever?) the "lesser of the two evils" won and it's good for Massachusetts and America.

To use the words of Michelle "My Bell" Obama "For the first time in my life I am proud to say I was born and grew up in Massachusetts.

If people went out and voted for McCain, we wouldn't have abortionist Sonya Sotomayer in the Supreme Court for God knows how many more years.