As for the accusation of "running away" — choosing to leave a conversation due to vulgarity or a refusal to even consider the possibility of sɛҳuąƖ impropriety is not cowardice. It’s a conscious decision to seek out a space that fosters greater respect and moral clarity.
To ignore the potential concerns raised by the kind of language some posters are using is, at best, naive.
Let’s not forget: Our Lady of Fatima specifically warned that sins of the flesh are a major reason souls are lost.
And we are living in a time when child pornography and sex trafficking are at record highs. These are serious issues that warrant vigilance, not dismissal.


Again- cнιℓd тrαffιcking is part of my actual job - I see red flags.

???

I don't know what sort of websites you're on where it's normal to judge the virginity of other people's daughters based on how they smile for the camera in a totally non-sɛҳuąƖ context, but this is probably one of the comments Peter Alcanatara was talking about.

You're very interested in the real or imagined sex lives of women "in the flower of their youth" at 12-14, while repeatedly expressing total disinterest of any women who are actually above the legal age.
Rome says 14 is the minimum age for marriage, not the maximum.

Minimum. Means it is allowed. You are a male feminist.

You know the biggest catalyst for loss of virginity at a young age is not desire, but peer pressure for both sexes.

Whichever.

I haven't seen anything on this thread to suggest CathInfo is even 1% more "risky" for picking out a random member and having them babysit your 9 and 11 year old girls, than the public at large.
Apparently you disagree.
I'd like to see the evidence for this.

Being honest about an attraction to teen females is NOT the same as being "1 step closer to being a sex offender". That is utter BS.
Admitting beauty or a physical attraction, and sin, are two completely different things. You can sin with just about anything, but sin is "neither here nor there" because sin is always forbidden, and everyone on CathInfo accepts this. No one here is planning to sin on purpose.

Because they are brainwashed to think that fornicating with contraception is a good thing, that if you don't waste your youth whoring yourself you are wasting your life, that you need to travel and see the world, that you are missing out on finding what you like etc. And then they are 25+, no hymen, bitter and miserable, debt from meme schooling, no real career (most women do not get carers despite the propaganda).

Public Service Announcement:

MEN aren't cowards. They don't play passive-aggressive games. They tell it like it is. They speak plainly and to-the-point. They don't beat around the bush.
And if they have something against someone, they would say it to their face.

In fact, I'll give the "devil" his due here, and say that WWSG gets high marks in this category. You got to give him that. Many of you could learn *that one thing* from him, where he has you beat. He doesn't mince words, he doesn't mince around like a passive-aggressive ...er... female dog.

I am reminded of the letter that "8 parishioners" wrote to Fr. Rostand (back in 2012) complaining about my wife and I being volunteers at the SSPX chapel, since we supported the Resistance. Yes, I'm sure I could put some subliminal messages in my Gregorian chant.

But my point? To this day I don't know who these people were. I don't doubt that some of them were "male" -- but none of them were MEN. You'd be *shocked* how few people even had the courage to tell me how they felt about Bp. Williamson's expulsion, Bp. Fellay's scandalous e-mail to the other 3 bishops, the Resistance, etc.
None of them DARED start anything with me, because I was educated and well informed on the matter, and their pathetic secondhand propaganda talking points would be destroyed by me in minutes. And they knew it. So they limited themselves to talking about me behind my back, while smiling at me in person. Typical Texas behavior.
I do recall that some people gave some of the Resistance parishioners a hard time -- because they were much less well informed. Such typical bully behavior: they pick on the weak, but if a strong man comes along, they put on their best behavior, because deep down they are cowards. They are always afraid to pick on someone who can defend himself.

Are you seriously asking him to reveal who downvotes you? Who cares?