Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: LIfeSite News  (Read 4160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stroopwafel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Reputation: +30/-28
  • Gender: Male
Re: LIfeSite News
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2025, 12:50:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • No compromise with homo-satanism.
    What do these pictures mean?



    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2406
    • Reputation: +1576/-94
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #17 on: July 09, 2025, 02:36:39 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • What the media isn’t telling you: July 9 - by Stephen Kokx


    • I’ve gone ahead and re-published my initial analysis of “Pope” Leo that I released just days after the conclave. LifeSite had asked me to take this down previously. I correctly predicted that Trad media would fawn over his fancy vestments and use of Latin. Beware of these wolves in sheep’s clothing as they are sowing false hope with their naive (and misplaced) optimism.


    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5045
    • Reputation: +1980/-404
    • Gender: Female
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #18 on: July 09, 2025, 03:11:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I was on lifesite.news black list about 2005, when Bishop Olmsted was made Bishop of Phoenix.  Lifesite.news stated, how wonderful it was for Phoenix, having a Pro-life Bishop.  Oh, how wonderful he is.   I replied, he is not pro-life, he is very much for catholic charities.  what he says and what he does are 2 different things.  He is a mason.  

    So, that was 20 years ago. 

    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18378
    • Reputation: +5713/-1973
    • Gender: Female
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #19 on: July 09, 2025, 03:41:09 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Maybe they got rid of him because of his support of Archbishop Vigano. 

    Our prayers are with Archbishop Vigano, John Henry Weston
     and others.  
    May God bless you and keep you


    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5003
    • Reputation: +1942/-244
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #20 on: July 09, 2025, 07:42:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here's what Steve Jalsevac sent out earlier this evening:

    Dear LifeSiteNews Readers and Supporters,

    In light of the recent announcement regarding John-Henry Westen’s departure as CEO and Editor-in-Chief, I wish to address the speculation surrounding this decision and provide clarity on behalf of LifeSiteNews. The board’s decision was made with careful deliberation, much prayer, and a steadfast commitment to our mission of promoting truth, life, and family values. We acknowledge the significant online speculation, much of which has been inaccurate, and we are very grateful to Bishop Joseph Strickland for his public statement calling out these misconceptions.

    While legal constraints prevent us from delving into extensive detail, I can share that the decision was influenced by several factors, including a 72% drop in readership from 2021 to 2024 during John-Henry’s tenure as CEO, a decline in monthly and new donors, and other business challenges. Additionally, an internal survey revealed significant concerns regarding staff sentiment and safety scores, which further informed the board’s considerations.

    We remain deeply grateful to John-Henry for his decades of service and his unwavering dedication to the pro-life cause. LifeSiteNews reaffirms its commitment to its mission of reporting on the four pillars of Life, Faith, Family, and Freedom. As we move forward, I, as one of the co-founders and now co-CEO of LifeSiteNews, will continue to guide the organization. We are dedicated to strengthening our mission and serving you, our readers, with uncensored reporting. We ask for your continued prayers and support during this transition.

    Sincerely,
    Steve Jalsevac
    Co-Founder and Co-CEO, LifeSiteNews


    As to donations, I never had money to send them in the first place, and am pretty much limited at this time to support of my local TLM and alms for the poor.

    Offline josefamenendez

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5495
    • Reputation: +4136/-286
    • Gender: Female
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #21 on: July 09, 2025, 07:49:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5045
    • Reputation: +1980/-404
    • Gender: Female
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #22 on: July 09, 2025, 08:09:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Drop of readers or $$$  In my opinion Lifesite news is new order.  I don't give to those who appear to be  sitting on a fence post.  Which way do they lean?


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32889
    • Reputation: +29161/-594
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #23 on: July 09, 2025, 09:14:23 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    Dear LifeSiteNews Readers and Supporters,

    In light of the recent announcement regarding John-Henry Westen’s departure as CEO and Editor-in-Chief, I wish to address the speculation surrounding this decision and provide clarity on behalf of LifeSiteNews. The board’s decision was made with careful deliberation, much prayer, and a steadfast commitment to our mission of promoting truth, life, and family values. We acknowledge the significant online speculation, much of which has been inaccurate, and we are very grateful to Bishop Joseph Strickland for his public statement calling out these misconceptions.

    While legal constraints prevent us from delving into extensive detail, I can share that the decision was influenced by several factors, including a 72% drop in readership from 2021 to 2024 during John-Henry’s tenure as CEO, a decline in monthly and new donors, and other business challenges. Additionally, an internal survey revealed significant concerns regarding staff sentiment and safety scores, which further informed the board’s considerations.

    We remain deeply grateful to John-Henry for his decades of service and his unwavering dedication to the pro-life cause. LifeSiteNews reaffirms its commitment to its mission of reporting on the four pillars of Life, Faith, Family, and Freedom. As we move forward, I, as one of the co-founders and now co-CEO of LifeSiteNews, will continue to guide the organization. We are dedicated to strengthening our mission and serving you, our readers, with uncensored reporting. We ask for your continued prayers and support during this transition.

    Sincerely,
    Steve Jalsevac
    Co-Founder and Co-CEO, LifeSiteNews


    1. First paragraph is basically repeating the corporate mumbo jumbo from the official press release.

    2. What does a Bishop have to do with it? Does he have some special charism of business planning, knowledge, omniscience, or infallibility? I don't get how a single Novus bishop's 2 cents is worth ANYTHING on this subject. Is this a lame attempt to bring all the "Better dead than red sede" crowd back in line instantly? This seems like a not-so-subtle reminder of what side they're supposed to be on (hint: AUTHORITY rather than truth) and when a Bishop speaks, they must listen and obey.

    3. If being Traditional or speaking the truth cost you 72% of your readership, that was some crap readership. What good does appealing to the lowest common denominator do for you? People who reject virtually all truth? Might as well start a secular news site if numbers are what you're after. You can't be truly Catholic and popular. Pick one.

    4. Safety scores? What the flip is a safety score? How is keeping John Henry Westen around "unsafe"?

    5. Last paragraph was more gobbledygook.

    The whole letter was 100% damage control. Good luck. This is the modern age of the independent journalist, the independent vlogger or youtuber, etc. John Henry is going to start a new news apostolate, as is Stephen Kokx. We don't need large, controlled news organizations, even those with only 50 employees. That's still pretty large, and apparently worth taking over.

    I'm seeing some patterns here:

    Mass at every parish -> SSPX (Mass within 1 hour of most places) --> Resistance (Mass within 10 hours of most places)
    Decent news on every channel/magazine --> LSN mid-size news organizations --> Independent vloggers/youtubers

    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12304
    • Reputation: +7800/-2386
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #24 on: July 09, 2025, 09:46:35 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    While legal constraints prevent us from delving into extensive detail, I can share that the decision was influenced by several factors, including a 72% drop in readership from 2021 to 2024 during John-Henry’s tenure as CEO, a decline in monthly and new donors, and other business challenges. Additionally, an internal survey revealed significant concerns regarding staff sentiment and safety scores, which further informed the board’s considerations.
    The bolded is all that matters.  This was a decision based on $, pure and simple.  They can talk about "prayer" all they want, but if the CEO doesn't bring in $, he's out.  LifeSite is a business, disguised as "catholic action".

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5003
    • Reputation: +1942/-244
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #25 on: July 09, 2025, 10:29:36 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0


  • Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32889
    • Reputation: +29161/-594
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #26 on: July 10, 2025, 01:08:00 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I got this from R.A. -- apparently these links are making the rounds.



    Quote
    Also fires staffer Stephen Kokx.

    Totally capitulates to the Novus Ordo sect and to the JEWS.

    https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/the-purge-at-lifesite-news-why-john?publication_id=4940692&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=379ifu&utm_medium=email

    https://x.com/JhWesten/status/1943065013025149007


    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.

    Offline Mr G

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2406
    • Reputation: +1576/-94
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #27 on: July 10, 2025, 07:17:36 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • the final phase came when Jalsevac published a response on his personal X account. Any pretense of neutrality was gone:
    Quote
    “In recent years, John-Henry worked and insisted that we change the highly successful LifeSiteNews mission to become a dramatically different one of a traditional, Latin Mass Catholic evangelizing, religious organization to draw readers into the Catholic Church according to the teachings of the Council of Trent…”
    He accuses Westen of turning LifeSite into a kind of retrograde missionary society centered on the Council of Trent. He says readers became confused. He claims donors felt alienated. He even admits some board members were removed to push Westen’s vision through, until the rest of the board removed him.
    And then comes the most damning quote of all:
    Quote
    Our fears about the dangers of the dramatic mission change have proven to have been valid. Readership has plummeted, many have been dismayed by the change, LifeSite has been widely viewed as a sedevacantist website and donations have dramatically declined this past campaign.





    FULL ARTICLE BELOW




    (4) The Truth Comes Out: John-Henry Westen Fired for Making LifeSite too Traditionally Catholic

    It didn’t take long.

    Just days after the boardroom coup that ousted LifeSiteNews co-founder John-Henry Westen, a coordinated, three-phase damage control campaign began rolling out, designed not only to calm supporters, but to reprogram the memory of why he was removed.

    What started as vague talk of a sabbatical, wrapped in thoughts and prayers, quickly morphed into a sanitized corporate narrative: “It was just business. Nothing personal. Please stop speculating.”

    But the sequence of events, and the tone of those involved, tells a different story.

    Phase I: Bishop Strickland Offers a Gentle Reassurance
    (https://x.com/bishstrickland/status/1942982186988130615?s=46&t=R4xyMNVYgeB6hu6jyd3HHA)

    The first public response came from Bishop Joseph Strickland. His statement framed Westen’s ouster as a sad but not sinister development:
    Quote
    “Some have suggested—or outright claimed—that he was removed because he spoke the truth about Pope Leo XIV… Let me state this clearly: that is not true.”
    He continued:
    Quote
    “We must resist the temptation to turn every change into a symbol of betrayal… John-Henry remains my brother in Christ, a man I respect and admire, and a voice we still need in this battle for the soul of the Church.”
    The tone was pastoral, almost fatherly. And while Strickland’s loyalty to Westen is evident, his insistence that “speculation” is harmful rings hollow when the facts are plain. The decision to fire Westen was not made in a vacuum. It followed months of high-profile speeches, interviews, and editorials in which he criticized Francis, Leo XIV, and the postconciliar regime with growing clarity.

    This wasn’t speculation, but cause and effect.

    Phase II: LifeSite Corporate Blames the Metrics
    (https://x.com/lifesite/status/1943061958720110962?s=46&t=R4xyMNVYgeB6hu6jyd3HHA)
    Next came the official LifeSite statement, posted to X under Steve Jalsevac’s name. Here, the tone turned managerial:
    • 72% drop in readership from 2021 to 2024
    • Declining donations
    • “Staff sentiment and safety scores”
    • Organizational restructuring
    This is classic HR-speak. The kind of language used to fire someone without admitting why. Westen wasn’t cast out for telling the truth, we’re told: he just confused the branding, scared the interns, and hurt the fundraising.

    Curiously, no mention is made that many websites and organizations faced reduced traffic and fundraising post-Covid; nor what specific content LifeSite is blaming for the downturn. But we’re left to infer: it was the increasing focus on Catholic tradition, the Latin Mass, and public confrontation with the papacy. In other words, the very things that made LifeSite matter.

    Phase III: Steve Jalsevac Goes Public and Blames Westen
    (https://x.com/jalsevacs/status/1943060853881999769?s=46&t=R4xyMNVYgeB6hu6jyd3HHA)

    The final phase came when Jalsevac published a response on his personal X account. Any pretense of neutrality was gone:
    Quote
    “In recent years, John-Henry worked and insisted that we change the highly successful LifeSiteNews mission to become a dramatically different one of a traditional, Latin Mass Catholic evangelizing, religious organization to draw readers into the Catholic Church according to the teachings of the Council of Trent…”
    He accuses Westen of turning LifeSite into a kind of retrograde missionary society centered on the Council of Trent. He says readers became confused. He claims donors felt alienated. He even admits some board members were removed to push Westen’s vision through, until the rest of the board removed him.
    And then comes the most damning quote of all:
    Quote
    Our fears about the dangers of the dramatic mission change have proven to have been valid. Readership has plummeted, many have been dismayed by the change, LifeSite has been widely viewed as a sedevacantist website and donations have dramatically declined this past campaign.
    There it is.

    That’s the heart of the problem. Not metrics. Not confusion. Not internal polling. The problem is that Westen was increasingly unwilling to play the game; unwilling to pretend Leo XIV was a break from Francis, unwilling to fake optimism about a synodal Church now openly affirming same-sex “blessings” and praising non-Christian religions as valid paths to God.

    He didn’t go full sedevacantist, but he broke the invisible rule: Never say out loud what traditional Catholics are whispering in private. The truth hurts donations.
    From Correction to Erasure
    The LifeSite leadership isn’t just explaining a firing. They’re rewriting Westen’s legacy:
    • From courageous critic → to confused evangelist
    • From faithful reformer → to mission creep
    • From truth-teller → to liability
    They want to retain his credibility without his conclusions. To preserve the audience without the message. They’ll praise his past while quietly removing his future.
    And to do this, they need you to believe this was a misunderstanding, not a betrayal.
    What They Want You to Forget













    Let the record show:
    • John-Henry Westen was fired after months of escalating clarity about the crisis in the Church.
    • He said publicly that Leo XIV would continue the war on tradition.
    • He called out synodality, Fiducia Supplicans, and doctrinal confusion with force and frequency.
    • And now the organization he helped build has exiled him, buried his message under “staff sentiment,” and told us all to stop speculating.
    They didn’t just remove him.
    They’re trying to unwrite him.

    Don’t Be Gaslit
    If you’re a faithful Catholic who saw in Westen a rare voice of resistance, you weren’t confused.
    If you sensed his firing was about fidelity, not finance, you weren’t paranoid.
    If you find this coordinated PR campaign grotesque in its condescension, you’re not alone.
    This was a purge, followed by a spin operation. And the only way it succeeds is if we agree to pretend otherwise.
    Don’t.



    Online MiracleOfTheSun

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 815
    • Reputation: +351/-142
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #28 on: July 10, 2025, 10:03:33 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Sounds like JHW was canned because of his public overtures for Roman Catholicism.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32889
    • Reputation: +29161/-594
    • Gender: Male
    Re: LIfeSite News
    « Reply #29 on: July 10, 2025, 10:04:33 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • https://x.com/jalsevacs/status/1943060853881999769?s=46&t=R4xyMNVYgeB6hu6jyd3HHA

    Steve Jalsevac
    @jalsevacs

    That is just what John-Henry may have wanted many to believe. It is completely false.

    LifeSiteNews has been a close team of many talented persons who created what was an incredibly successful, international pro-life, pro-family news service. None of that could have happened without all those people and their valuable contributions to what, for the first 12 years, was a project of and within Canada’s national pro-life organization that dealt with many international developments related to the culture of death vs. the culture of life.

    It was founded, funded, encouraged and guided by CLC and especially by its leader Jim Hughes who was the visionary who saw the great need for the pro-life movement to have its own international news service to counter the lies, manipulations and ignoring of many important developments within the international pro-life movement.

    CLC gave us its large email list to begin the incredible growth of LifeSite. LifeSite would never have existed without CLC.

    Jim Hughes assumed we would continue to grow and continue as the pro-life, pro-family news agency that it was founded to be and which CLC gave so much to from its own resources.

    In recent years, John-Henry worked and insisted that we change the highly successful LifeSiteNews mission to become a dramatically different one of a traditional, Latin Mass Catholic evangelizing, religious organization to draw readers into the Catholic Church according to the teachings of the Council of Trent.

    Founding board members Jim Hughes, myself and others strongly opposed this change which we believed would tremendously confuse our loyal readers and subscribers and most new people as to what LifeSiteNews really was because of the schizophrenic messaging that the new mission statement presented.

    A large majority of subscribers and readers were not traditional Latin Mass Catholics or not Catholic at all, and the changed LifeSiteNews would appeal to a far narrower audience since the target audience that John-Henry insisted on preaching to were only a tiny fraction of Catholics and violated our founding purpose.

    Sadly, John-Henry was able to arrange a board vote that outnumbered those who never thought they would have to vote on such a dramatic change, including other board memberss who were removed prior to the vote for poor behaviours because they were so intensely opposed to the change in what they had given so much of themselves to for a number of years.

    One of those board members was wholly responsible for encouraging and paying for LifeSiteNews to incorporate in the United States and was a very generous donor and constantly active supporter in many other ways. The other removed board member was also a major donor and played a large role in our highly successful sustainers program

    LifeSite will not die because it has always had a strong appeal to international pro-life Catholics/Christians amd others of goodwill and has never been dependent on any one person.

    Our fears about the dangers of the dramatic mission change have proven to have been valid. Readership has plummeted, many have been dismayed by the change, LifeSite has been widely viewed as a sedavacatist website and donations have dramatically declined this past campaign.

    Without major needed change LifeSiteNews cannot survive. With common sense return to the incredibly successful founding mission and a return to collaborative management, rather than top-down, one person control, it stands a very good chance of tremendous renewal for the good of all.

    We will still always been based on traditional Catholic/Christian moral principles in all we do, as we always have been.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.