Wasn't Westen the founder?

Stephen Kokx let go:

https://x.com/stephenkokx/status/1942413806300217467

He didn't say there that he was let go. He might have left due to the leadership change.

I'm just sitting here saying to myself "what is this stercorum tauri?".

I wouldn't have seen eye to eye with LSN or JHW on each and every little thing, but this is disturbing.

The truth needs to come out.

A friend of mine told me some time ago that they had seen John-Henry Westen attending the local SSPX chapel here in VA.  If I had to guess...  The board probably wasn't very happy when they found out about it and his generally leaning more away from the concilliar church.

Prayers for these two men and that they find good replacement jobs.  

I remember years ago we were discussing on Cathinfo
(after a particularly obnoxious pro-zionist article about "anti-semitism" on Lifesite),
that Lifesite must be taking zionist money to print an article like that.

I suspect, as was done to James O'Keefe, that there are zio-sympathizers on the board who don't like the way Westen was leaning about the JQ and against the Jew supported Consiliar Church

Matthew Tyrmand , virulent zionist jew and Veritas board member, was instrumental in getting rid of O'Keefe.

Now the CEO of project Veritas is a Goldman Sachs jew named Berg.

You barely hear of Project Veritas anymore because there is nothing ((they)) like better than silencing and destroying their opposition.

I'd certainly like to know who is on the "board" of Lifesite is and if there is a jew in the woodpile.

The worst thing a Traditional Catholic organization can do to itself is open it's control to a "board".

It seems that Lifesite News was actually started by a group (Campaign Life Coalition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LifeSiteNews and not just John Henry Western.

Steve Jalsevac, is the
President, and Co-Founder along with John-Henry Westen,
Editor-in-Chief, Co-Founder.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/meet-the-incredible-lifesite-team/

(3) The Purge at LifeSite News: Why John-Henry Westen Had to Go

John-Henry Westen, co-founder and longtime Editor-in-Chief of LifeSiteNews, is out. Not retired. Not taking a break. Not transitioning to another role. He’s been removed. Voted out by a board of directors at the very institution he helped build. Fired, then repackaged as a “sabbatical.”

This is a great article. Thank you, Mr. G., for this important contribution.

I can put myself in a Trad Catholic (Resistance) like Stephen Kokx's shoes pretty easily.

He had been there a long time, and he knew what was happening. He might have spoken to other employees, outraged at what was going on. He was trying to do the right thing, defend truth and goodness, and the cause of God in general.

I'm sure he was controlled, Catholic at all times, and has nothing to apologize for. Just as I was, when I was speaking out at my SSPX chapel about the unjust ouster of Bp. Williamson and the various changes in the SSPX back in 2012. I didn't care what happened to me. I had to speak out. And I note that not a single person opposed me, or had anything to shoot me down with. Not to my face, at least. A half-dozen anonymous cowards wrote a passive-aggressive letter to Fr. Rostand the District Superior, bitching about how I support the Resistance yet I'm allowed to sing in the schola.

If they were right, why didn't they attack me who they believed was "in error"? If truth was on their side, they should have been confident and pushing for a confrontation -- not fleeing into the shadows.

In Stephen's case, it got him fired. In my case, my wife and I got fired from our volunteer positions. In both cases, it was complete BOVINE STERCORA.
These firings are reminiscent of Bp. Williamson's unjust expulsion, as well as the persecution against +ABL. Both of these never got a fair "trial" because that would be impossible. They were 100% in the right.

At the very least, they just randomly "laid him off" as a big (((cohencidence))) when they took this hard-Left turn away from Tradition.

Remember what I said years ago, that LifeSite was on the right trajectory (on the way up, more and more Traditional), whereas SSPX was on the wrong (downward) trajectory?

Not any more. Think about it: Anyone who stays behind at LifeSite is now COMPROMISED. Willing to look the other way as Tradition is purged from LifeSite. As the article said: Westen had no scandal. There was no reason AT ALL to drum him out OF HIS OWN ORGANIZATION. Something's going to change now at LifeSite, and it isn't for the good. We're talking practical, noticeable, real change. You don't change one of the MAIN LEADERS without practical changes happening on the ground.

And anyone "good" or "mostly good"? They will be USELESS now, as they compromised with this. Compromise neutralizes you, as people hate to contradict themselves going forward. Just like if +ABL had said "just one New Mass" he would have been neutralized in his fight against Conciliar errors.