Author Topic: LifeNews.com a GOP front group? (Read 918 times)

Belloc · « **Reply #1 on:** January 19, 2010, 10:46:17 AM »

site has Steven's name as part of it blogs it follows and recognizes. Article is about how to rebuild the GOP

http://www.rebuildtheparty.com/plan

Belloc · « **Reply #2 on:** January 19, 2010, 10:46:52 AM »

http://mikehuckabee.meetup.com/boards/thread/4324308

Belloc · « **Reply #3 on:** January 19, 2010, 10:49:03 AM »

so far, folks, everytime I look the site or Steven's name, it is generally "Republicans good-Democrats bad".like dealing with GOP front group NRTL...

also, go to the site and do a search of "Chuck Baldwin" or "Michale Peroutka".....you get nothing at all, no mention at all of 2 candidates that had a 100% pro-life platform....hmmm.....plot thickening.....

Belloc · « **Reply #4 on:** January 19, 2010, 10:51:35 AM »

http://digg.com/politics/Michigan_Panel_to_Decide_This_Month_on_Human_Embryo_Research

on poster here put it very well, he states:

"How ironically sad that while Steven Ertelt recognizes the evil of human embryo research conducted on days-old unborn children, he so diligently promotes John McCain for President.

John McCain is NOT strict on the life issues:
U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 110th Congress - 1st Session, April 11, 2007, A bill to amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for human embryonic stem cell research. McCain (R-AZ), "Yea"
Source: http://www.opencongress.org/roll_call/show/3009

http://discuss.americasrevival.com/showthread.php? ...

He's campaigning now, and will say whatever he thinks will get him the votes. When he's in office, it will be "Maverick" John McCain once again.

Why don't pro-life organizations work to promote totally pro-life candidates? "

Why indeed!

Belloc · « **Reply #5 on:** January 20, 2010, 08:14:40 AM »

Belloc · « **Reply #6 on:** January 20, 2010, 08:28:05 AM »

LifeNews likes Scott Brown, but article notes he favors more troops to get the "job done" and thinks same-sex "marriage" is "settled issue":

http://www.masslive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/republican_scott_brown_seeking.html

Belloc · « **Reply #7 on:** February 23, 2010, 08:06:02 AM »

apparently, for Lifenews, its ok to give tax money to Planned Parenthood, as long as it is for family planning and not directly for abortion.then by all means give bucks to PP:

http://www.lifenews.com/nat3574.html

Bush increased funding:

"In FY08, Title X will be funded at the record high level of nearly $300 million -- a $17 million increase from the FY07 levels."

abortion is not part of family planning? do what!

"One thing that most Americans can agree upon is that abortion is not a form of family planning," the letter says. "Yet, these Title X funds continue to be used by abortion providers such as Planned Parenthood to promote abortion."

Belloc · « **Reply #8 on:** February 23, 2010, 08:08:54 AM »