Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Mark 79 Take-over?  (Read 887 times)

1 Member and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1604
  • Reputation: +779/-731
  • Gender: Male
Re: Mark 79 Take-over?
« Reply #15 on: Today at 10:53:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
    • "Keep it up, Mark! Love the content." --LeDeg

    LeDeg is one the members who never interacts with me. I understand. He's a buddy of Alaric, who's fooled by Jim Caviezal (https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UBXLgCJgRf2) and Alaric never suspected that VoxClamantis@fisheaters.com thought that "anti-Judaism had nothing in common with Catholicism." He boasts of having a problem with VC's fag/tranny promotion. Well, almost everyone had a problem with that, which is why you saw the huge exodus of former FE members. Some of them came here, and some of them started SuscipeDomine forum (and others -- I remember that short-lived forum started by Paragon, before SuscipeDomine). That hardly marks him as insightful. Alaric learns from jws how to be anti-jwish. He's a disciple of the fake convert "Brother" Nathanael Kapner.

    Alaric thinks Heat is a great movie. He's a dork, like the marranos Pacino and DeNiro. Pacino worked for Commentary magazine back in the 1960s, before his acting career took off.

    I'm not gung-ho about Mark79. He's a lightweight compared to me. And that is not a boast on my part. He thinks JayneK's conversion is sincere and thinks George Carlin was an Irish gentile. And, of course, I could say more.

    And that is depressing to type.

    I always want people to see more than I see.

    None of you could have ascertained back in 2010 that VoxClamantis@Fisheaters was a marrano/crypto. Only I saw it, and meticulously set her up to out herself, when I got her to say, "anti-Judaism has nothing in common with Catholicism."

    It used to amuse me, but now irks me, that people have accused me of being Croix. I'm ruthlessly consistent. Check out my previous accounts if you don't believe me. Mark79 is all over the place, much like Croix. I don't know that Mark79 is Croix, but he would be a better guess as to being Croix than me. How's Mark79's friend Always doing?

    It's a good thing I have an appetite for absurdity or I would lose my mind.

    I suggest you all read every issue of Fr. Feeney's The Point. You'd be far less gullible if you did.
    Logged
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline FarmerWife

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 634
    • Reputation: +410/-45
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Mark 79 Take-over?
    « Reply #16 on: Today at 10:55:49 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Justinian on Today at 04:51:51 AM
    Bless your heart 😆I think it’s great you’ve got the time to devote to studying and discussing various aspects of the faith.

    Thank you for your charitable words🤣 I will most certainly pray for you 💐
    Did you not read your “charitable” words? 
    Logged

    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1604
    • Reputation: +779/-731
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mark 79 Take-over?
    « Reply #17 on: Today at 11:24:30 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • This is a good post of mine.

    Jws need to control all sides, so they need to harness anti-jwish energy. And they have their helpers. I like Joe Sobran a lot, but I still consider him a helper of jws.
    Logged
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 13314
    • Reputation: +8720/-1619
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Mark 79 Take-over?
    « Reply #18 on: Today at 01:23:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: rum on Today at 10:53:55 AM
    …I'm not gung-ho about Mark79. He's a lightweight compared to me. …Mark79 is all over the place, much like Croix. I don't know that Mark79 is Croix, but he would be a better guess as to being Croix than me. …

    I agree that I am a "lightweight." Since I cannot read Hebrew, Aramaic, Yiddish, or Rashi, I must depend upon others to bring primary sources to the table.  Yes, I am a midget standing on the shoulders of those who have done the "heavy lifting." I have stipulated this previously.

    I don't think it is true that I am "all over the place," perhaps undecided on some issues where there is conflicting evdience (e.g., Putin), but I dispute your claim of "all over the place." I think that is pure hyperbole.

    I am not "Croix."

    Now it's your turn. After your last message to me, I posted this thread:
    Imperfections, a perspective https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/imperfections-a-perspective/msg1001007/#msg1001007

    I assume you did not see it, because it reflects a style quite unlike yours and yet you did not respond.

    Here is another opportunity for you to read it and perhaps respond.


    Quote from: Mark 79 on October 04, 2025, 12:44:09 PM

    It is rather common that I receive messages from well-meaning readers commenting on the beliefs and behaviors of this-or-that individual. It happens often enough that I thought I'd offer this.

    I am not perfect. I am a sinner. I make non-sinful mistakes daily; on some days, hourly. Despite that, I know that I am a reasonable, though imperfect source.

    It is unreasonable for me to expect more perfection from my earthly sources that I myself can manage.

    Consider that I quote the damned rabbis and their satanic "holy books." Please understand then that even the most wicked of sources can provide useful data points and evidence.

    As a Catholic, I accept and submit to Magisterium. I recognize too that there is a spectrum of theological certainty. For that reason, my website has this page on Theological Certainty: https://archive.is/1rbqh

    So, I reserve outright vituperation for those condemned by the authentic Magisterium… and for those who exhibit a pattern of deception, destruction of the Faith, and ill-willed infiltration.


    To be clear, I do not expect anyone, not even my wife or children, to be my clone or to agree with me on every debatable point. I am not preaching tolerance of heresy or sin, but I fail to see benefit is sniping from the weeds at the imperfections of others. I do expect (and enforce to the extent possible) agreement on points defined by the Church. Obviously I do believe and act in accord with St. Francis de Sales:

    Quote
    "The declared enemies of God and His Church, heretics and schismatics, must be criticized as much as possible, as long as truth is not denied. It is a work of charity to shout: 'Here is the wolf!' when it enters the flock or anywhere else." St. Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life, Part III, Chapter 29

    Its glaringly obvious that I sin and am flawed. I am old (ouch!) and still have not become as good as I aim to be (more ouch!).

    Lastly, I express my hope that you have reach beyond your rare posts here. I hope that you are putting your knowledge and insights into Catholic Action, doing more than sniping at the imperfections of others. I do wonder if you have lost "the big picture."
    Logged
    Pages: 1 [2]
    « previous next »