Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Kind interpretations  (Read 1955 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kind interpretations
« on: September 08, 2022, 05:41:46 PM »
An excerpt from the Spiritual Conferences of Fr. Faber on the virtue of kind interpretations and how we should do our best to cultivate such a virtue, especially in our cold, uncharitable modern world.


Quote
But there is one class of kind thoughts which must be dwelt upon apart. I allude to kind interpretations. The habit of not judging others is one which it is very difficult to acquire, and which is generally not acquired till very late on in the spiritual life. It men have ever indulged in judging others, the very sight of an action almost indeliberately suggests an internal commentary upon it. It has be-come so natural to them to judge, however little their own duties or responsibilities are connected with what they are judging, that the actions of others present themselves to the mind as in the attitude of asking a verdict from it. All our fellow-men, who come within the reach of our knowledge, and for the most retired of us the circle is a wide one, are prisoners at the bar; and if we are unjust, ignorant, and capricious judges, it must be granted to us that we are indefatigable ones. Now all this is simple ruin to our souls. At any risk, at the cost of life, there must be an end of this, or it will end in everlasting banishment from God. The decree of the last judgment is absolute. It is this—the measure which we have meted to others. Our present humour in judging others reveals to us what our sentence would be if we died now. Are we content to abide that issue? But, as it is impossible all at once to stop judging, and as it is also impossible to go on judging uncharitably, we must pass through the intermediate stage of kind interpretations. Few men have passed beyond this to a habit of perfect charity, which has blessedly stripped them of their judicial ermine and their deeply-rooted judicial habits of mind. We ought therefore to cultivate most sedulously the habit of kind interpretations.

Men’s actions are very difficult to judge. Their real character depends in a great measure on the motives which prompt them, and those motives are invisible to us. Appearances are often against what we afterwards discover to have been deeds of virtue. Moreover a line of conduct is, in its look at least, very little like a logical process. It is complicated with all manner of inconsistencies, and often deformed by what is in reality a hidden consistency. Nobody can judge men but God, and we can hardly obtain a higher or more reverent view of God than that which rep-resents Him to us as judging men with perfect knowledge, unperplexed certainty, and undisturbed compassion. Now kind interpretations are imitations of the merciful ingenuity of the Creator finding excuses for His creatures. It is almost a day of revelation to us, when theology enables us to perceive that God is so merciful precisely because He is so wise; and from this truth it is an easy inference, that kindness is our best wisdom, because it is an image of the wisdom of God. This is the idea of kind interpretations, and this is the use which we must make of them. The habit of judging is so nearly incurable, and its cure is such an almost interminable process, that we must concentrate ourselves for a long while on keeping it in check, and this check is to be found in kind interpretations. We must come to esteem very lightly our sharp eye for evil, on which perhaps we once prided ourselves as cleverness. It has been to us a fountain of sarcasm; and how seldom since Adam was created has a sarcasm fallen short of being a sin? We must look at our talent for analysis of character as a dreadful possibility of huge uncharitableness. We should have been much better without it from the first. It is the hardest talent of all to manage, because it is so difficult to make any glory for God out of it. We are sure to continue to say clever things, so long as we continue to indulge in this analysis; and clever things are equally sure to be sharp and acid. Sight is a great blessing, but there are times and places in which it is far more blessed not to see. It would be comparatively easy for us to be holy, if only we could always see the characters of our neighbours either in soft shade or with the kindly deceits of moonlight upon them. Of course we are not to grow blind to evil; for thus we should speedily become unreal. But we must grow to something higher, and something truer, than a quickness in detecting evil.
-p. 25-27.


Re: Kind interpretations
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2022, 05:47:19 PM »
Good stuff. 

See signature. 


Re: Kind interpretations
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2022, 06:10:08 PM »
Good stuff.

See signature.
Very good as well.

This, in particular, in the OP is what stood out to me:
Quote
Now kind interpretations are imitations of the merciful ingenuity of the Creator finding excuses for His creatures.


How often to any of us seek to excuse others? I know I don't often. Wickedness is so widespread these days that it's a monumental task to give a kind interpretation to the actions and words of others.

Re: Kind interpretations
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2022, 12:22:20 PM »
Thanks for posting. I think for us traditional Catholics were so used to seeing sin and error ignored that we feel we have to make a lot of noise so to speak. For example, the constant "kind interpretation" of Francis comments which are many times just wishful thinking. Sometimes the "kind" thing to do is to admonish the sinner. Even if someone says something or does something that looks bad but didn't mean it in that way, someone needs to speak out because many others will take it the wrong way. And when a guy like Francis refuses to clarify what he means he's bringing it on himself. I do realize we must try to refrain from judging the person and merely judge the word or action in question. The problem is, the hierarchy are suppose to be judging what's right and wrong. When they refuse to do so, like today, we feel that we must do it for them. At least that's how I feel. I feel like I have to constantly explain to others especially my family why something a bishop or the pope said or did is wrong. It's tuff because the average Joe is more likely to listen to the hierarchy than a lay person, which would normally be a good thing but times are crazy. What a mess lol. Again, thanks for posting. There does need to be a balance. 

Offline Tradman

  • Supporter
Re: Kind interpretations
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2022, 12:39:59 PM »
Great post. Love Fr Faber. 

"Appearances are often against what we afterwards discover to have been deeds of virtue."  --Fr Faber