Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Catholic Living in the Modern World => Topic started by: 2Vermont on March 24, 2024, 07:20:23 AM
-
Anyone else following the Kate Middleton story these past weeks? I typically do not pay attention to anything about the Royal Family, but I have to admit that the recent odd/doctored pictures of and now video of Kate Middleton saying she has cancer has definitely drawn me into the intrigue despite the fact that none of it affects me. :laugh1: I'm having a hard time accepting/believing anything the Kensington Palace puts out.
Anyone else following it/have thoughts on it?
-
I want everyone to keep in mind we fought two wars to get away from that family. I don't understand the obsession some people have with them.
-
I want everyone to keep in mind we fought two wars to get away from that family. I don't understand the obsession some people have with them.
I actually don't understand my recent focus on them either. Up until now, I never cared. I think it's a combination of my interest in mystery and my inability to trust any news reports anymore.
-
I want everyone to keep in mind we fought two wars to get away from that family. I don't understand the obsession some people have with them.
.
No kidding. The less I think about that Addams Family, the better my mind is. :trollface:
I really don't understand it when you talk to English traditional Catholics (or anyone British in any way, including Australians), and they have some bizarre love and reverence for this bunch of sociopaths. It looks like Stockholm Syndrome more than anything else.
-
There's certainly something very sordid/nefarious going on with the putative (fake) "Royal Family", and the last video from Kate is almost certainly AI (as various AI experts have concluded) .. and this after two attempts at publishing a fake picture (clearly photoshopped) and a fake video (not Kate). It's probably related to that Kingston "ѕυιcιdє" (or "murder"?) somehow ... which is very unlikely to just be a coincidence.
Really, though, the biggest problem that comes out here is that AI is getting better and better at generating deep fake videos, and there will come a time very soon where NOBODY will be able to tell the difference. We won't need the old Commie tactic of using doubles or need people to wear masks anymore, as you could have Biden, Trump, Putin, or even Jorge Bergoglio get on TV to make some public statements that are 100% deepfake, and no one would ever know.
Here's "Princess Elizabeth" (before becoming Queen) being made into a "bard" at some Welsh Druidic ceremony:
(https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQmXEMtidQ-vEJ3b60Vt9eL1FmfOULQqUGECyEQ5EpDXg&s)
Then you had "Prince" Andrew's involvement with Epstein's "girls", and here's Evelyn Rothschild telling "Prince" Charles who's boss.
(https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/vtcruvfuAOskNSTA11Gcqg--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTEyNDI7aD04ODk-/https://media.zenfs.com/en/aol_press_association_news_966/9253e556a8bbf52dc03e312cf78d054d)
Apart from the fact that St. Pius V declared Elizabeth I deposed, referring to her as the "pretend Queen of England", the true succession of the British monarchy (due to now-proven illegitimacy) rests with the son of a truck driver in Australia.
-
There's certainly something very sordid/nefarious going on with the putative (fake) "Royal Family", and the last video from Kate is almost certainly AI (as various AI experts have concluded) .. and this after two attempts at publishing a fake picture (clearly photoshopped) and a fake video (not Kate). It's probably related to that Kingston "ѕυιcιdє" (or "murder"?) somehow.
Really, though, the biggest problem that comes out here is that AI is getting better and better at generating deep fake videos, and there will come a time very soon where NOBODY will be able to tell the difference. We won't need the old Commie tactic of using doubles or need people to wear masks anymore, as you could have Biden, Trump, Putin, or even Jorge Bergoglio get on TV to make some public statements that are 100% deepfake, and no one would ever know.
Yes. The deep fakes take the Jєωs' cognitive infiltration to a whole new level.
-
Another thought about cancer: When Oswald was shot by Ray, after JFK, talk was Ray was given a shot and to die from cancer is just 2 weeks?
-
https://voxday.net/2024/03/23/good-news-and-bad-news/
-
https://voxday.net/2024/03/23/good-news-and-bad-news/
Yeah, I think some of the questions or assertions I've seen on X are off/wrong, but overall, I find it hard to believe that this is all on the up and up given KP/the media has been handing us lies for weeks now. One of the questions I have is: why wasn't William sitting with her during this announcement? Wouldn't/Shouldn't he be?
I guess time will tell...?
-
There's certainly something very sordid/nefarious going on with the putative (fake) "Royal Family", and the last video from Kate is almost certainly AI (as various AI experts have concluded) .. and this after two attempts at publishing a fake picture (clearly photoshopped) and a fake video (not Kate). It's probably related to that Kingston "ѕυιcιdє" (or "murder"?) somehow ... which is very unlikely to just be a coincidence.
Really, though, the biggest problem that comes out here is that AI is getting better and better at generating deep fake videos, and there will come a time very soon where NOBODY will be able to tell the difference. We won't need the old Commie tactic of using doubles or need people to wear masks anymore, as you could have Biden, Trump, Putin, or even Jorge Bergoglio get on TV to make some public statements that are 100% deepfake, and no one would ever know.
And this latest turn of events leads me to wonder whether we're about to hear about the rollout of the new mRNA vaxx for cancer.....
-
And this latest turn of events leads me to wonder whether we're about to hear about the rollout of the new mRNA vaxx for cancer.....
Yeah, we know full well that the "Royals" got saline shots, and they have access to the various cancer cures that have been otherwise suppressed from the general public.
-
I want everyone to keep in mind we fought two wars to get away from that family.
Who is the "we"?
Do not count me amongst you all. In 1775 and 1812 my family were either in Britain and Ireland or Loyalists in British North America.
-
Yeah, we know full well that the "Royals" got saline shots, and they have access to the various cancer cures that have been otherwise suppressed from the general public.
Yes, but Catherine Middleton is not of ersatz royal blood. She is a disposable ornament on the House of Windsor.
Not Windsor, nor Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, nor Hanover are the legitimate dynasties are England, Scotland, and Ireland. Heretic usurpers all!
🏴 🏴 ☘️ 🏴
-
When I first watched the Princess vid... the nagging question I had was why she was alone without her husband at her side?
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1772028732833755394
-
When I first watched the Princess vid... the nagging question I had was why she was alone without her husband at her side?
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1772028732833755394
That's the most glaring issue to me. The other things like her sweater, her "missing" ring, and the bench slats not so much.
-
That's the most glaring issue to me. The other things like her sweater, her "missing" ring, and the bench slats not so much.
Re: the sweater she's wearing... apparently the British Royals aren't that rich, as it is the exact same sweater she wore in a promotional video from seven years ago?
-
Re: the sweater she's wearing... apparently the British Royals aren't that rich, as it is the exact same sweater she wore in a promotional video from seven years ago?
It's actually not. The stripes are thinner, and I believe the length of the sleeves are different.
-
Another thought about cancer: When Oswald was shot by Ray, after JFK, talk was Ray was given a shot and to die from cancer is just 2 weeks?
It was Jack Ruby who shot Oswald, not someone called "Ray", and he died three years later. He had cancer but died of a pulmonary embolism.
-
When I first watched the Princess vid... the nagging question I had was why she was alone without her husband at her side?
https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1772028732833755394
There would have been no real reason. Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense. She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.
Probably nothing to see here.
-
There would have been no real reason. Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense. She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.
Probably nothing to see here.
Has Prince William made any comments?
-
There would have been no real reason. Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense. She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.
Probably nothing to see here.
That is a very kind interpretation, good sir. However, nothing about this situation passes the smell test.
-
Has Prince William made any comments?
They're treating the situation as a private family matter, as any of us would probably do in that situation.
-
Has Prince William made any comments?
He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.
IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
-
They're treating the situation as a private family matter, as any of us would probably do in that situation.
Their offerings have been immediately and repeatedly exposed as fake garbage -- and it's been 90 days since anything legit has been known or seen. Something is unquestionably rotten in Denmark and they are just hoping to keep Slick Willy II out of trouble.
-
He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.
IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcCPR7hQHCk&ab_channel=sewingcircle100 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcCPR7hQHCk&ab_channel=sewingcircle100)
-
He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.
IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
I don't think it's THAT nefarious, but there is definitely something not adding up about this whole affair.
-
2Vermont, I could almost have written your OP, and I agree with gladius_veritatis that "nothing about this situation passes the smell test."
Ladislaus made some good points in this (https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/kate-middletonroyal-family/msg931755/#msg931755) post, especially about "AI getting better and better at generating deep fake videos, and there will come a time very soon where NOBODY will be able to tell the difference. We won't need the old Commie tactic of using doubles or need people to wear masks anymore, as you could have Biden, Trump, Putin, or even Jorge Bergoglio get on TV to make some public statements that are 100% deepfake, and no one would ever know." [I've sometimes wondered how much of our current presidency is already using that.]
A few more thoughts, to add to some others in this thread:
Why all the previous lies, including denials of cancer?
Where are the children?
Why no visits while she was supposed to be in hospital, except 1 visit from William?
Where were the paparazzi when she left the hospital?
Some in England have said the weather in the video doesn’t match the weather in that area at that time. "The weather in Windsor was between 44 and 54 degrees during the day, cloudy and wind was 6 mph. A sick woman sitting outside on a cold day with no jacket seems a bit odd." Why not film it indoors, with her sitting in an easy chair, if she’s sick?
Someone mentioned to watch the number of times she blinks as proof of AI. [I haven't bothered.]
Surely they told the children about King Charles’ cancer, so why was it so hard to explain about Kate?
-
There would have been no real reason. Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense. She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.
Probably nothing to see here.
Except that his not being there only creates more questions, not less.
-
Except that his not being there only creates more questions, not less.
Yes, it totally seems odd. She speaks of how supportive he is, but then she's all alone on the bench. Definitely would be much better "optics" if he were sitting there with her, looking supportive. But I've heard some say that it would be harder to do the AI video that way.
-
When a massively-public figure, possessing an army of PR people, makes posts that include a reversion to a sign that has NOT been seen since his single days, he is telling you he is SINGLE again. She is dead or, at best, comatose until they choose to pull the plug and reveal she is dead. Frankly, it doesn't even matter. We've all got our own houses to attend to as this world goes ever-more-rapidly insane. Godspeed.
-
When a massively-public figure, possessing an army of PR people, makes posts that include a reversion to a sign that has NOT been seen since his single days, he is telling you he is SINGLE again. She is dead or, at best, comatose until they choose to pull the plug and reveal she is dead. Frankly, it doesn't even matter. We've all got our own houses to attend to as this world goes ever-more-rapidly insane. Godspeed.
Agreed about our own houses. I'm about to start a rosary and I will include her. Because no matter what my thoughts are on this whole mess it is NOT a reflection on her. She seems like a good egg.
-
Agreed about our own houses. I'm about to start a rosary and I will include her. Because no matter what my thoughts are on this whole mess it is NOT a reflection on her. She seems like a good egg.
Even the bad eggs need prayers, but I tend to agree. Our Lady of Fatima and of the Holy Rosary, pray for us.
-
Yeah, I think some of the questions or assertions I've seen on X are off/wrong, but overall, I find it hard to believe that this is all on the up and up given KP/the media has been handing us lies for weeks now. One of the questions I have is: why wasn't William sitting with her during this announcement? Wouldn't/Shouldn't he be?
I guess time will tell...?
Or, why the distraction?
-
If this last video was real, she would appear to be in good enough condition to have sat for a real picture. So why did they release the photo-shopped picture? Why did they release the video of someone who clearly wasn't her? People familiar with AI have pointed out numerous anomalies that suggest it was an AI-generated deepfake video.
I agree that she's likely either dead or seriously incapacitated. So, the prevailing theory is that William was enraged over finding out that she had been having an affair with Thomas Kingston and either severely injured or killed her. Kingston either killed himself (official story) or else was Arkancided in the days before March 1. Timing of this seems highly suspect. Either he was distraught about Kate's condition or else was silenced, since he knew too much about what had happened.
There have been other strange goings on, such as some horses riding out in a manner to suggest a death in the royal family, a flag pulled down to half mast, with the media being told of an impending announcement from the royal family, only for a few hours later for the flag to be put back up to full and the announcement cancelled.
There's definitely something more than their having delayed an announcement of cancer so that it can be properly explained to the children. As I said, they could have easily released a real photo of Kate (instead of the shopped one) if she had been in as good condition as she appeared in the alleged video.
-
IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
I agree that this makes the most sense. If she simply had succuмbed to some natural health condition that caused her death or coma or other incapacity, it could merely have been announced. There's certainly some kind of "coverup" taking place, and this speculation fits with the known facts better than anything else.
It'll likely be announced in a few weeks that she succuмbed to the cancer and passed away. Cancer story is paving the way as an explanation for her death.
Apart from everything else, I don't believe for a second that the royals got the real mRNA jab (maybe a saline if anything at all), nor do I believe that they do not have access to various cures for cancer that have been withheld from the general public. I don't believe for one second that Kate would go on chemo.
-
Another thought about cancer: When Oswald was shot by Ray, after JFK, talk was Ray was given a shot and to die from cancer is just 2 weeks?
You mean Jack Ruby. James Earl Ray was supposedly Martin Luther King murderer.
-
You mean Jack Ruby. James Earl Ray was supposedly Martin Luther King murderer.
(((Jacob Rubenstein))), aka Jack Ruby
-
Re: the sweater she's wearing... apparently the British Royals aren't that rich, as it is the exact same sweater she wore in a promotional video from seven years ago?
Royalty, nobility, and "old money" buy good-quality clothes, and keep them for years and years. King Charles wears this old coat that has been patched many, many times. Kind of like how I conceal rips on my cheap leather jacket with discreetly-placed glossy black duct tape. You'd never know, and it's cheaper than buying a new jacket.
-
I think she's dead. I think the тαℓмυdic world power does not need the Royals anymore- too nationalistic. Can't have a centralized World government with Royals. They served their purpose, so it's over for them worldwide I suspect. They probably didn't give them the memo about the shot or didn't give them the placebo.
-
I don’t wish sickness or disease on anyone including my enemies.
-
I don’t wish sickness or disease on anyone including my enemies.
No, but the question is whether she's actually sick or something nefarious is happening.