Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Kate Middleton/Royal Family  (Read 2434 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bonaventure

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1249
  • Reputation: +792/-272
  • Gender: Male
Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2024, 12:03:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's the most glaring issue to me.  The other things like her sweater, her "missing" ring, and the bench slats not so much.

    Re: the sweater she's wearing... apparently the British Royals aren't that rich, as it is the exact same sweater she wore in a promotional video from seven years ago?


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10102
    • Reputation: +5280/-917
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #16 on: March 25, 2024, 12:05:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Re: the sweater she's wearing... apparently the British Royals aren't that rich, as it is the exact same sweater she wore in a promotional video from seven years ago?
    It's actually not.  The stripes are thinner, and I believe the length of the sleeves are different.
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)


    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4416
    • Reputation: +1642/-195
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #17 on: March 25, 2024, 12:12:50 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Another thought about cancer: When Oswald was shot by Ray, after JFK, talk was Ray was given a shot and to die from cancer is just 2 weeks?

    It was Jack Ruby who shot Oswald, not someone called "Ray", and he died three years later.  He had cancer but died of a pulmonary embolism.

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4416
    • Reputation: +1642/-195
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #18 on: March 25, 2024, 12:14:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When I first watched the Princess vid... the nagging question I had was why she was alone without her husband at her side?

    https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1772028732833755394

    There would have been no real reason.  Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense.  She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.

    Probably nothing to see here.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10102
    • Reputation: +5280/-917
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #19 on: March 25, 2024, 12:20:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There would have been no real reason.  Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense.  She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.

    Probably nothing to see here.
    Has Prince William made any comments?
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #20 on: March 25, 2024, 12:22:21 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • There would have been no real reason.  Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense.  She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.

    Probably nothing to see here.

    That is a very kind interpretation, good sir.  However, nothing about this situation passes the smell test.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4416
    • Reputation: +1642/-195
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #21 on: March 25, 2024, 12:22:44 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Has Prince William made any comments?
    They're treating the situation as a private family matter, as any of us would probably do in that situation.  

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #22 on: March 25, 2024, 12:25:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Has Prince William made any comments?

    He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.

    IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."


    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #23 on: March 25, 2024, 12:30:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • They're treating the situation as a private family matter, as any of us would probably do in that situation. 

    Their offerings have been immediately and repeatedly exposed as fake garbage -- and it's been 90 days since anything legit has been known or seen.  Something is unquestionably rotten in Denmark and they are just hoping to keep Slick Willy II out of trouble.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4416
    • Reputation: +1642/-195
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #24 on: March 25, 2024, 12:36:57 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.

    IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10102
    • Reputation: +5280/-917
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #25 on: March 25, 2024, 12:40:42 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • He made a statement by publicly mingling with other ladies and using some sort of emblem on his posts that he had not used since he was single.

    IMO, he killed her and they're just trying to determine the best way to reveal she is dead and keep him out of trouble for the murder.
    I don't think it's THAT nefarious, but there is definitely something not adding up about this whole affair. 
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)


    Offline B from A

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1109
    • Reputation: +691/-128
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #26 on: March 25, 2024, 12:44:04 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • 2Vermont, I could almost have written your OP, and I agree with gladius_veritatis that "nothing about this situation passes the smell test.

    Ladislaus made some good points in this post, especially about "AI getting better and better at generating deep fake videos, and there will come a time very soon where NOBODY will be able to tell the difference.  We won't need the old Commie tactic of using doubles or need people to wear masks anymore, as you could have Biden, Trump, Putin, or even Jorge Bergoglio get on TV to make some public statements that are 100% deepfake, and no one would ever know."  [I've sometimes wondered how much of our current presidency is already using that.]

    A few more thoughts, to add to some others in this thread:

    Why all the previous lies, including denials of cancer? 

    Where are the children? 

    Why no visits while she was supposed to be in hospital, except 1 visit from William?

    Where were the paparazzi when she left the hospital?

    Some in England have said the weather in the video doesn’t match the weather in that area at that time.  "The weather in Windsor was between 44 and 54 degrees during the day, cloudy and wind was 6 mph. A sick woman sitting outside on a cold day with no jacket seems a bit odd."  Why not film it indoors, with her sitting in an easy chair, if she’s sick? 

    Someone mentioned to watch the number of times she blinks as proof of AI.  [I haven't bothered.]

    Surely they told the children about King Charles’ cancer, so why was it so hard to explain about Kate? 




    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10102
    • Reputation: +5280/-917
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #27 on: March 25, 2024, 12:55:08 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There would have been no real reason.  Catherine was the one who was sick, and "by my side" can be understood in a metaphorical sense.  She was perfectly capable of speaking on her own.

    Probably nothing to see here.
    Except that his not being there only creates more questions, not less.  
    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. (Matthew 24:24)

    Offline B from A

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1109
    • Reputation: +691/-128
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #28 on: March 25, 2024, 12:59:24 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Except that his not being there only creates more questions, not less. 

    Yes, it totally seems odd.  She speaks of how supportive he is, but then she's all alone on the bench.  Definitely would be much better "optics" if he were sitting there with her, looking supportive.  But I've heard some say that it would be harder to do the AI video that way.  

    Offline gladius_veritatis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 8018
    • Reputation: +2452/-1105
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Kate Middleton/Royal Family
    « Reply #29 on: March 25, 2024, 01:06:38 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • When a massively-public figure, possessing an army of PR people, makes posts that include a reversion to a sign that has NOT been seen since his single days, he is telling you he is SINGLE again.  She is dead or, at best, comatose until they choose to pull the plug and reveal she is dead.  Frankly, it doesn't even matter.  We've all got our own houses to attend to as this world goes ever-more-rapidly insane.  Godspeed.
    "Fear God, and keep His commandments: for this is all man."