Is the traditional Latin Mass mostly a suburbanite, neocon, white people's thing?
My grandmother-in-law from Mexico attended a FSSP Mass in the States, and she liked the Mass, but was appalled by the congregation, who struck her as aloof, unfriendly, and, I'd say, "WASPy." My wife, too, thinks similarly.
I also have a friend, who lives in poverty and embraces it, who left an ICRSS church because she thought the congregation was snobbish and unwelcoming of materially poor people; she now attends a Novus (dis)Ordo, even though she considers it not as Catholic. She judges the Mass by the fruits of the people who comprise the congregation; i.e., she thinks something is wrong with the Mass just because the congregation doesn't appear to her to have good fruits. Is this a fair judgment? To me, the congregation matters little compared to whether the priest and the Mass are theologically sound. Should I care more about who comprises the congregation? Apparently St. Isidore wrote about how the congregation does matter.
Also, keep in mind: I have never heard men making these criticisms; just women.
So, why does it seem the TLM does not attract more poor people or people of other races? Is the TLM an elitist thing?