Flight paths and emergency landings give credence to the Antarctic ring.

By Antarctic ring I mean the flat earth model with Antarctica as a ring around the world.

Dave Weiss has some pretty good vids and Flat Earth Banjo has some good ones on the various emergency landings that make absolutely no sense on a globe earth.

Maybe the angels of the sun and the moon make them change shapes at the proper times.

Very long video, but it debunks 90% of modern scientific assumptions.  It's exteremely well done.

You think you "win" simply be calling it "garbage" and linking to one "debunking" video.  I've seen most of the debunking videos debunked.  There was one program on PBS that purported to prove earth's curvature using a helicopter, but it was exposed as fake footage when an identical flock of birds and identical wave and cloud patterns appeared, demonstrating that the helicopter was superimposed on the exact same background both when it was going down and when it was rising up.

This is really interesting, have a link on it? I can see this since PBS is just a propaganda arm.

That's how it is. Lad is a conman, with no idea what he's talking about.




You admit that you can't even explain the phases of the moon, which are known to every interested observer on earth.

Why don't you simply shut up, instead of calling Galilei and the Church fools? You're the fool. You're an arrogant fool knowing nothing but pretending to know it all better!

.
Hey man, what's your deal? Is everything okay over there?

Says you, a scientific illiterate, and you provide ZERO evidence.

And neither do you.  You just spew insults.

And neither do you.

On the contrary, I explained that specific point [why the atmosphere doesn't go away] to you correctly. I can provide further explanation if you ask. But if you choose to reject reality, that's your problem, not mine.

That's how it is. Lad is a conman, with no idea what he's talking about.

To be fair, I don't think Lad is a conman. I think he's unable to see the errors in some of the people he follows. Some of them are conmen; I think Dubay falls in that category.

He is unable to see the errors because he doesn't appear to have any scientific training. That may not be his fault. He went to college for humanities, so he probably never studied any science beyond high school. And science education in the US is abysmal. But people who don't know a field should have at least some level of humility and defer to people who actually do know that field. That's one place where Lad could do better.

So unfortunately, Lad didn't see the errors in various "arguments" he heard about FE. And that being a while ago, he probably can't actually remember any of these "arguments" with any detail. Notice that the most detailed "argument" so far is a reference to an unspecified PBS show that allegedly "faked" some images. Even if everything Lad said about that were true, it would only mean some people made a bad argument - it wouldn't prove the earth is flat.

And so now he believes several false "arguments". If anyone were to refute an argument, he would just bring up another "argument", and another, and eventually circle back to the first one as if it had not been refuted.

And so, I'm willing to discuss one argument. ONE. If Lad can pick one.

On the contrary, I explained that specific point [why the atmosphere doesn't go away] to you correctly.

You did nothing of the sort, just threw the term "escape velocity" out there, a mathematical construct based on the assumption that gravity is a real thing, and which no scientific writing I've ever seen used to explain why the atmosphere doesn't leave the earth.  They use a combination of air pressure and gravity.  Your throwing out the term "escape velocity" is not evidence by any stretch.  If you consider that evidence, that discredits you as being learned in science, despite your pretensions.