If an unbaptised person commits only venjsl sins will they enjoy natural beatitude in limbo or burn in hell?

Neither. He will be brought into the Church by Divine Providence.

If an unbaptised person commits only venial sins will they enjoy natural beatitude in limbo or burn in hell?

If that person dies unbaptized, he dies outside of the Church. Per Pope Eugene IV in Cantate Domino, it is dogma that all those who die outside the Catholic Church: "go into the eternal fire prepared for the devil, and his angels."

Neither. He will be brought into the Church by Divine Providence.

Right.  I believe this as well, along the lines of what St. Thomas wrote ... but I did consider the matter from a hypothetical perspective.

Let us consult St. Thomas: St. Thomas Aquinas teaches in I-II, Q.89, A.6 that when a child reaches the age of reason, if he orders himself toward his last end as well as he can, he immediately attains sanctifying grace (which we would call baptism of desire), and if he does not, he sins mortally. His state of knowledge is not relevant, so the child is able to attain grace even if he is completely ignorant of the Church and Christ.

"I answer that, It is impossible for venial sin to be in anyone with original sin alone, and without mortal sin. The reason for this is because before a man comes to the age of discretion, the lack of years hinders the use of reason and excuses him from mortal sin, wherefore, much more does it excuse him from venial sin, if he does anything which is such generically. But when he begins to have the use of reason, he is not entirely excused from the guilt of venial or mortal sin. Now the first thing that occurs to a man to think about then, is to deliberate about himself. And if he then direct himself to the due end, he will, by means of grace, receive the remission of original sin: whereas if he does not then direct himself to the due end, and as far as he is capable of discretion at that particular age, he will sin mortally, for through not doing that which is in his power to do. Accordingly thenceforward there cannot be venial sin in him without mortal, until afterwards all sin shall have been remitted to him through grace. " (I-II, Q.89, A.6) ...


... This comparison is very helpful when looking at the necessity of explicit faith for salvation. Obviously St. Thomas does not believe that it is necessary by an absolute necessity, both because men before Christ were saved without it, and also because men after Christ can be justified, and made fit for heaven without it. However, he seems to hold a necessity of infallibility, insofar as God intends that after the advent of Christ, every man who dies justified also dies with explicit knowledge of Christ." From: https://outsidethechurchnosalvation.blogspot.com/2009/06/st-thomas-aquinas-on-salvation-by.html

Baptism of desire is not Pelagian heresy, you blundering buffoon. Pope St. Pius X also taught souls can be justified by acts of perfect love of God or contrition. Guess he's a "Pelagian heretic" to you too, eh, you dimondite tool? Only idiots believe themselves or those like you in prefernce to popes, saints and doctors of the Church. St. Alphonsus also taught the same. Read the quote from St. Thomas properly, you probly didnt even know of it till i quoted it. Read it properly, it says exactly what the link says it does. btw, before Christ came, baptism of desire was the universal means of justification for all, both jews and gentiles, as anyone who has faith and reflected on it for 2 mins would know. since your only agenda is to promote trash you read from the dimonds who brainwashed you, guess that excludes you. Real catholics will stand with and trust those like St. Thomas, St. Pius X and St. Alphonsus,notyou.

The great thomist Fr. Garrigou Lagrange, highly praised by archbishop lefebvre, explained in life everlasting: "“Theologians in general are inclined to fill out what Scripture and tradition tell us by distinguishing the means of salvation given to Catholics from those that are given men of good will beyond the borders of the Church. …If we are treating of all Christians, of all who have been baptized, Catholic, schismatic, Protestant, it is more probable, theologians generally say, that the great number is saved. First, the number of infants who die in the state of grace before reaching the age of reason is very great. Secondly, many Protestants, being today in good faith, can be reconciled to God by an act of contrition, particularly in danger of death. Thirdly, schismatics can receive a valid absolution. If the question is of the entire human race, the answer must remain uncertain, for the reasons given above. But even if, absolutely, the number of the elect is less great, the glory of God’s government cannot suffer. Quality prevails over quantity. One elect soul is a spiritual universe; further, no evil happens that is not permitted for a higher good. Further, among non-Christians (Jews, Mohammedans, pagans) there are souls which are elect. Jews and Mohammedans not only admit monotheism, but retain fragments of primitive revelation and of Mosaic revelation. They believe in a God who is a supernatural rewarder, and can thus, with the aid of grace, make an act of contrition. And even to pagans, who live in invincible, involuntary ignorance of the true religion, and who still attempt to observe the natural law, supernatural aids are offered, by means known to God.”

Nope.i understand it just fine.baptism of desire means an act of perfect love of God, or an act of contrition,along with explicit or implicit desire for the sacraments.yes, prots, orthos etc in material heresy/schism can make acts of contrition, enter or recover the sttate of grace, and thus remain or reenter the Church, outside of whichthere is no state of grace.rewarder god theory is not any heresy, and the same Holy Office condemned those who denied baptismofdesire under Pope Pius xii. Justification by implicit faith, and salvation after explicit faith is held by many theologians and is an acceptable and allowable opinion.fr. garrigou lagrange explains it very reasonably.Youneedto repent of your dimonditeheresy, my friendladislaus,and return home once and for all to the Roman Catholic Church.