Why do you (women) demand that there be no prenup and demand a state marriage license?

Nice try, but wrong analysis, for most, if not all, of the men were clueless about the despotic role of state marriage licenses, nor did they know they could have opted out. They were simply going through the motions.

Yeah, pseudo-intellectuals like JezusDeKonig, who also LARP, like to thumb their noses at other people such as Dowell, albeit, he's a heretic, who still have way more brains than JDK, and will build far more than he ever will...

When there is an awaking to the despotism of state marriage licenses, it's women who still insist on getting it, while many men are leary of it. That shows you the mindset.

You're asking the wrong question. You're trying to shape reality to fit skewed perceptions of Catholics, and then base questions off of it.

If you want evidence, simply Google search "MGTOW" or related subjects, and you'll see the exponential numbers of men who aren't MGTOW, per se, themselves, but they still strongly support prenups and avoiding marriage licenses. They're not MGTOW because they still carefully plan on getting married. Also, in states with common law "marriages", they naturally insist on prenups to protect them.

The numbers of Catholics in such an awakening doesn't matter. What matters is the reality of the epidemic of "divorces" sought by women, and the courts favoring the women despite their reason or lack of reason for the "divorce". The women use the courts to steal what the man owns and built his entire life. What does matter is Catholics need to take notice. Observe, orient, decide & act.

Your fallacy is thinking trad Catholics are too righteous to succuмb to this epidemic, simply because they're trads. Trads are every bit as human as any other person, and they're "divorcing" each other and wrecking their own families. too. You even mentioned an example of some harlot who "divorced" her husband, left the Faith, all after having 10 kids with him, and getting the courts to make him pay for supporting the children while she's "married" to another man. You think it will stop there? You still maintain that trads as a whole are impervious to it. There was once a time when the Church was living Holy Tradition, but Vatican II happened. If Vatican II can happen to the Bride of Christ, then trad Catholic women can be infected with the world, thus turn on her husband and try to take everything he built and earned. Didn't Newchurch, through Vatican II, take most, if not all, of true Church's property and wealth? Yes, it did. Individual women are more easily corrupted than the Church. So why shouldn't a man get a prenup and avoid a marriage license to protect himself?

Those two things are contradictory and you already know which of them I said. The other I did not.

I refer to Catholics when YOU refer to Catholics. You said, "Why do you (women) demand that there be no prenup and demand a state marriage license?" Everyone here is a Catholic and so you are talking about Catholics. If you weren't, you wouldn't have said "you". (or is this another example of your misuse or pronouns?)

You shoot yourself in the foot here again. Married Catholics do not have ownership apart from their spouse. They join their assets together in marriage and work & earn together during their married life. Everything they both do is for the family, not for themselves.

Now, if you'd use precise language, you could point out here that sometimes an unjust levy is issued against the man where he has to provide for his ex-spouse a level of support that he can't even provide for himself.

This is unjust and could be remedied with a proper agreement beforehand. There are other injustices that you also could have mentioned, but instead you chose to attack the very nature of married life with your un-Catholic attitude.