Poche is hardly the only forum member who will not admit that he (or she) is wrong; nor is he the only one who will not apologize for being wrong. The sedevacantists come to mind regarding this.
Don't think that I'm a fan of Poche. I am not. I've debated issues with him, and he never admits he's wrong - I know that. But he's not the only one who is guilty of this.
In point of fact,
YOU do what Poche does.
YOU contradict settled doctrine (the degrees of theological certitude). You continue to conflate anathematized heresy with legitimate opinions. In the face of the evidence provided from Ott,
YOU have not admitted you are wrong in that point. Whether or not you like it, there are theologians whose opinions differ from yours. Disagreement on unsettled matters is NOT heresy, Behar.
Further, as soon as QVD provided evidence that I was in error in saying that
cuм Ex Apostolatus Officio had not been abrogated, I immediately publicly admitted and retracted my error. Also, I immediately corrected my website. cuм Ex Apostolatus Officio has been abrogated. I deal in evidence and truth. You deal in muddle-headed emotionalism.