Money. They can pay them next to nothing since the SSPX provides boarding.
I don't think that explains it. Old ladies (widows, retirees, et al.) aren't more financially needy than young ones, are they?
It seems the younger ones would be less likely to be infected by liberal ideas than long-time (or certified/degreed) teachers.
Also, younger teachers are more similar in temperament to children than old ladies, so young teachers are better for young children.
teacher either finds a husband or goes back to live with parents after a few years
Or enters religious life.
1) get women in prime child bearing age into a dead-end liberal arts program (for some women who weren’t taught this stuff by their parents, maybe the degree could be helpful, but I don’t think girls should be going to college regardless)
The SSPX Sisters, too, require at least a 2 year college degree. I knew someone who almost became one; but she wanted to enter religious life immediately, not delay it by obtaining a college degree.
There is something about women who teach other people’s kids for a living that makes them not desire a husband.
Prior to circa 1917, female teachers had to be single.
Her becoming a teacher is a good way to push a “single” vocation onto your daughter.
Maybe. It could also help her discover her vocation (or delay pursuing her vocation…).