Firstly, I must say it's unbecomming of a woman to use the word "dude" ... Please straighten up your verbage.

GladiusV, this poster used to be called "Croix" and has been banned 5-6x but he keeps creating new usernames.  Right now, he's using at least 4 usernames at the same time.  He obsessively berates women, talks about the jews and can't carry on any normal conversation without devolving into angry outbursts.  Just wanted to fill you in, so you don't waste time.

The GCM could certainly be veiled in the language of Sacred Scripture. It doesn't matter much anyway until something actually starts happening. We can't promise anything and we shouldn't get locked in on any particular prophecy, but you can't blame us for hoping for some signs of life.

Anyway, looks like we're all in for a show: Opus Dei may just have their very own candidate in Alexander Tschugguel.



1:23:56-1:26:13

I suppose we will see. Is it mangled English, an overshadowing by the Opus Dei, Great Monarch Madness, or the real deal? I'm leaning towards the Opus Dei being tasked with herding the Trads with their very own GCM facsimile. But you never know!

I just assumed he meant to follow this up with something, oh I don't know:

"I promise you God will give me immediately a very, very, very big task."

Big?  

That, and it was in that same interview that Tshugg-Knight blew Taylor's cover as the real architect of the counter-Pachamama event. A low profile is understandable and I can't pretend I know what else they're up to but dimes will get you donuts in the Church basement that Taylor and Co. keep a close eye on how their image is being received. Someone may or may not read the forums here.

You are telling a woman what is "unbecomming," yet you misspell unbecoming.  What is more, "verbage" is also incorrect.  It is verbiage. 

If you are going to pose as a linguist of any kind, whether specializing in the colloquial diction of the ancient world or the proper grammar of modern tongues, you might want to straighten up yo dumb a** because I (and others here) will slice you to pieces.  No, it isn't worth my time, but something about your arrogance just makes me want to waste some time on your nonsense anyway.

Wouldn't the great conversion be the Jєωs who convert at the end of the world ?

Ohhh, I thought it was all of them

The point is that the 100% Catholic Bible, including Revelation and all of the prophesies contained therein, trump any private revelation after the last public revelation to St. John. Nowhere in the 100% Catholic Bible does it mention a "Great Monarch" according to your narrative. The Bible is canon. The private revelation to which you subscribe aren't canon.

If this "Great Monarch" was so important, it would be mentioned in the Bible, but it's not.

Even if the private revelations are true about him, he is so insignificant to the whole picture, that thge Lord God excluded him from scripture. You're essentially missing the forest for the trees. You focus on a tree ("the Great Monarch") but you miss the forest (what Revelation requires us to believe).