Thanks for the links, quick take based on those: She's leading with lots of agreement-eliciting opening lines but the rest of it kind of falls apart once you dig a little. There's a hyperactive
YouTube channel (over 8K videos? how does that happen?) with a million and a half subscribers. But there's also very immodest dress mixed in with the prairie frocks (even in one video about the Church, of all topics), scuzzy and totally unnecessary screenshots of exactly what she's criticizing, and a sketchy and suspect dating history. Not going to link to any specifics, but the internet's there for the record. Words say one thing, but the visuals and the bio say something else.
She's a coy and clever child of the wealthy leftist elite (mom's a "population" expert) and may have learned from a young age how to manipulate the discourse. Clickbait, shock value, owning the libs, and so on, cruising high on all the attention she's getting from this rebellious influencer stint and will likely revert to form soon enough.
Like a lot of these shooting star young female darlings of the conservative/right/reactionary set (ugh, sorry, all vague and distracting labels and categories), it boils down to why is she seeking out the spotlight and running her mouth so much if she really believes what she claims about the proper place of women. Unless she's an eager marionette being fed her lines by a bunch of unphotogenic bros, though that may or may not exculpate her. Girl, go home, fix your wardrobe, and trade those headphones for Rosary beads....