His Hebrew tagline translates to:  "Blessed be the Lord Jesus Christ."  

I would translate it  more literally, as "Blessed be the Name of Jesus the King."  I'm not sure that it makes much difference in this case.   

In regard to the topic, there is an old church in my area which has the statues and stained glass pictures for male Saints on one side and female ones on the other.  I was told that this corresponded to seating for men and women in the congregation.

There is a lot of evidence that this was the traditional practice, although, as Matthew points out, I wonder how about how practical it would be to implement under current conditions.

How is that?
Only creeps or freaks would be carnally tempted in Church by hearing a feminine voice.
Seriously? Get realistic.
Church segregation would be weird.

There are some hardcore Orthodox Jєωs who believe that hearing a woman's voice is tempting and violates Jєωιѕн law.

I have read that the chief reason for the separation of the genders during Holy Mass was because of the ancient practice of the Pax or "kiss of peace", which all of the faithful and clerics participated in, then. Nowadays the Pax is limited; given only during a solemn high Mass and between the clerics only. So, separation of genders--not a necessary thing anymore. It made sense to me. And I agree wholeheartedly with Seraphina on this topic.

There are some hardcore Orthodox Jєωs who believe that hearing a woman's voice is tempting and violates Jєωιѕн law.

The SSPX forbids female soloists in the Catholic liturgy. (I'm not sure if this is something specific to SSPX or if it is/was a liturgical law.)

Pius X re-emphasized this prohibition on the ground that women were not permitted to fulfil any liturgical function (Motu proprio ‘De musica sacra’, 1903).

No, the original SSPX, Archbishop Lefebvre, etc. are not dumber than you. They are well aware of those quotes forbidding women in "choir".

The "choir" spoken of in that prohibition is a completely different animal than the thing you call a "choir" at your local Trad chapel. That is the short version.

I've answered this question in depth before, but with all the activity and traffic on CathInfo, I can't find it at the moment.

If the singing isn't liturgical (an official part of the liturgy; as in, the priest doesn't have to repeat it up there at the altar) then it's just a lay choir, and that's completely different.
The prohibition is about liturgical choir, as in "choir stalls" that monks or seminarians sit/kneel/stand in while they recite the Divine Office (the official, public prayer of the Church). Example sentence, "Sister Mary was in Choir reciting Terce when the bishop arrived at the convent."

It's a confusion of terms. Sometimes a term can mean two completely different things.

For example, the term "anti-semitism". It depends on who is defining it.

Anti-semitism (hatred of a human being because he is Jєωιѕн) is a grave sin.
Anti-semitism (opposing the errors of Judaism, and/or the agenda of the Jєωs following the тαℓмυd and trying to bring about the One World Government of the Antichrist) is a virtue.

This is a good example of why reading a single book doesn't make one an expert. A person with high intelligence might assume that because he can read and understand English that he knows how to interpret or apply a given sentence that he reads somewhere. That's not always the case.