The signs were all there.  When schools put computers in classrooms (not needed) and when parents let their children play with phones/tablets.  These children are being groomed to be tech-slaves.

The signs were all there.  When schools put computers in classrooms (not needed) and when parents let their children play with phones/tablets.  These children are being groomed to be tech-slaves.

Computers and calculators, even the Internet is *nothing* compared to the effect this brain rot slop is having on the minds of young children. It's like a brain-addling drug. And did you watch the video? The stuff they're saying was never intended for kids. They are using slang terms that normally only teens and adults (those ready to get involved romantically) are accustomed to say.

One of the comments summed it up: 

As someone who practiced NLP...I can't watch this.  It reminds me of an old technique where the practitioner bombarded the "subject" with nonsense until their brain "crashed"...then they could implant whatever programming they wanted into the person.

And this video didn't even mention the "six-seven" phenomenon. Where Gen Alpha will repeat that phrase over and over, just because it sounds cool or something, like a verbal tic. It's pathological. This goes light-years beyond anything like TV addiction, latchkey kids, or anything previous generations experienced.

Really disturbing. But, buried amidst all the suggested videos similarly lamenting the state of gen Alpha, was this gem:

Thanks for posting that!

Not only is she a ray of hope and a good example for youtube creators, she fills the critical role of "showing what's wrong with the other channels, by demonstrating what they're missing".

It's often hard for many people to notice things that are *missing*.

They might say, "Of course it's dumb, it's for little kids" or something superficial like that. But NO, content for little kids does NOT need to be brainrot like that; "allow me to demonstrate" -- that's where Ms. Rachel comes in.

Thanks for posting that!

Not only is she a ray of hope and a good example for youtube creators, she fills the critical role of "showing what's wrong with the other channels, by demonstrating what they're missing".

It's often hard for many people to notice things that are *missing*.

They might say, "Of course it's dumb, it's for little kids" or something superficial like that. But NO, content for little kids does NOT need to be brainrot like that; "allow me to demonstrate" -- that's where Ms. Rachel comes in.

Dr. White talks about the importance of fairy tales for child development in his "Introduction to Charles Dickens" starting around minute 35.

I like her videos and show them to my toddler. However she has some wokeness in her videos. There’s a female who dresses masculine in her videos and identifies as non-binary.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Hoffman

Overall, her videos aren’t very junky and she has different videos for toddlers and babies.

Thank you for the caveat.

The whole point of this thread is that toddlers and babies SHOULDN’T be watching ANY videos.  It’s not good for their brains.

I hope the down vote was a misclick, children so young are easily addicted from the colours and facial expressions on video thumbnails, the algorithm is very effective against them.