From a comment in the German report on Gloria.tv:
"46 minutes ago
edited
@Klaus Elmar Müller
The tumor was already discovered in 2019, did not arise from vaccination." (My traduction)
Well, yes, presuming this is factual, this proves the cancer did not arise from the nanobot clotshot.
Whether the nanobot clotshot accellerated the preexisting cancer, as discussed in the docuмentary "Died Suddenly" will probably remain unknown.
What is known is that the official policy of the FSSPX on the clotshot is that it is a matter of choice, prudence, and alleged charity, and therefore nobody can object to wondering if this prist was vaxed. Particularly after all the arguments from apologists saying that it could be a sacrifice to keep the apostolate going, entire school faculties and priories (New Zealand) have been vaxed, and even the Superior General doenn't think its a big deal.
OK, then if its not immoral, why get defensive from the question?