Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11

Author Topic: From the White House?  (Read 143388 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Twice dyed

  • Supporter
Re: From the White House?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2025, 02:12:16 PM »
So this might be a politically motivated White House message, but it even raised my 🥸 ! Leaders nowadays need prayers! Hail Mary...! 
Logged

Offline Stubborn

  • Supporter
Re: From the White House?
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2025, 02:32:19 PM »
Quote from: Pax Vobis on December 09, 2025, 01:00:02 PM
That was beautiful.
Yes, it certainly was.
Logged

Online WorldsAway

Re: From the White House?
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2025, 03:29:23 PM »
No reference to Our Lady's perpetual virginity?  :confused:
 
Logged

Offline Miseremini

Re: From the White House?
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2025, 08:12:37 PM »
Quote from: Michaelknoxville on December 09, 2025, 12:00:49 PM
I have a feeling dwindling support from Catholics made it necessary to toss us a bone. I hate to be a pessimist but as they  build and consolidate the technocratic machine around us…… I can’t help it. I’m worried they are going to use the Vatican to consolidate all the religions.
So what....God's been pulling good from bad for centuries.  He's got a plan, our job is prayer and fasting. I can see God working wonders with that proclamation coming from a high lay office.
Logged

Offline Gray2023

  • Supporter
Re: From the White House?
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2025, 08:21:10 PM »
Quote from: SkidRowCatholic on December 10, 2025, 07:41:17 PM
How did all the "wise ones" on CI (who commented on this) miss this Christological error, but the Judaism-loving Novus Ordites caught it :confused:

Unless they think that this error is "beautiful"...

https://www.ncregister.com/commentaries/editorial-white-house-december-8-message

"But the Dec. 8 message also included an unfortunate error with respect to the moment the Son of God took on our humanity and commenced his earthly life as Jesus Christ.

According to the presidential message celebrating the Virgin Mary’s own conception without any stain of original sin, “God became man when Mary gave birth to a son, Jesus, who would go on to offer his life on the Cross for the redemption of sins and the salvation of the world” [emphasis added].

That’s not correct. The Son of God joined his divine nature with his human nature at the Incarnation — the moment of Jesus’ own conception in Mary’s womb at the Annunciation — just as every human life commences at conception. So God had already been man for nine full months when Mary gave birth to Jesus in a Bethlehem manger on Christmas Day."
I guess we just have to focus on the one bad thing in the speech. (Probably just human error and not a nefarious plot.) It was probably not some statement about when life begins like the NCR made it.  Now the devil will get attention and the good that God might have wanted us to see, dissipates into oblivion.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 11
« previous next »