Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology  (Read 12075 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 2Vermont

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11527
  • Reputation: +6477/-1195
  • Gender: Female
Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
« Reply #90 on: May 12, 2023, 01:05:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • OK, so if we all agree with JST that Bellarmine’s position was that a declaration must precede a deposition, then I guess we have no argument.
    Did you really think I meant that in my post?  I was referring to past disagreements on this board between sedes and non-sedes.  That disagreement was that Bellarmine's opinion was different than the others (ie. that a declaration was NOT necessary; that a heretic pope lost his office ipso facto), but it was "just another opinion", that it holds no more water than the other different opinions.  Now I'm seeing a new argument:  that Bellarmine's opinion wasn't different after all (ie. that he agrees with the others).  

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #91 on: May 12, 2023, 01:28:43 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did you really think I meant that in my post?  I was referring to past disagreements on this board between sedes and non-sedes.  That disagreement was that Bellarmine's opinion was different than the others (ie. that a declaration was NOT necessary; that a heretic pope lost his office ipso facto), but it was "just another opinion", that it holds no more water than the other different opinions.  Now I'm seeing a new argument:  that Bellarmine's opinion wasn't different after all (ie. that he agrees with the others). 

    Who ever alleged JST, Cajetan, and Bellarmine all saw eye to eye on deposition in toto (as though there were not 1 opinion instead of 5)?

    What I’ve been saying is that they all agree ON THIS PARTICULAR POINT (ie., that a declaration is necessary for deposition).

    JST says this is Bellarmine’s position.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11527
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #92 on: May 12, 2023, 01:55:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Who ever alleged JST, Cajetan, and Bellarmine all saw eye to eye on deposition in toto (as though there were not 1 opinion instead of 5)?

    What I’ve been saying is that they all agree ON THIS PARTICULAR POINT (ie., that a declaration is necessary for deposition).

    JST says this is Bellarmine’s position.
    OK. You're saying they agreed ON THAT POINT.  That was NEVER the argument on this board when speaking of Bellarmine's position. It was always understood by sedes and non-sedes alike that he believed in an ipso facto deposition. Suddenly, what he wrote in the fifth opinion isn't what he "really meant".  


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47137
    • Reputation: +27937/-5208
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #93 on: May 12, 2023, 03:22:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • OK. You're saying they agreed ON THAT POINT.  That was NEVER the argument on this board when speaking of Bellarmine's position. It was always understood by sedes and non-sedes alike that he believed in an ipso facto deposition. Suddenly, what he wrote in the fifth opinion isn't what he "really meant". 

    Right, the correct interpretation of his 5th opinion is really the same opinion as Cajetan's ... even though St. Robert was not bright enough to notice when he rejected it.

    This is just more pathetic puerile desperation from the SVDS types (Sedevacantism Derangement Syndrome), where they try to twist St. Robert.

    And they can keep on playing pretend all they want, as the Church has not formally condemned their position (except the part where they claim that the Church can judge a pope), but this is just a distraction from the core issue, namely, their attribution of corruption to the Catholic Magisterium and to the official public worship of the Church (the latter proposition having been explicitly anathematized by the Council of Trent ... but they don't care ... they'd rather be anathematized by Trent than entertain that SVism is correct, and they'd rather pretend that Jorge is St. Pius X "the New" rather than admit that the See might be vacant).  I think some psychiatrist could write a doctoral thesis on the psychological problems responsible for rendering them bereft of all logic and Catholic sense.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47137
    • Reputation: +27937/-5208
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #94 on: May 12, 2023, 03:27:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • SVDS ... those suffering from SedeVacantist Derangement Syndrome get triggered at the mention of anything that might suggest Jorge Bergoglio might not be a legitimate pope.



    So much so that they would rather attribute corruption to the Catholic Magisterium and the Catholic Mass (thereby incurring the anathema of Trent).


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #95 on: May 12, 2023, 03:29:25 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • OK. You're saying they agreed ON THAT POINT.  That was NEVER the argument on this board when speaking of Bellarmine's position. It was always understood by sedes and non-sedes alike that he believed in an ipso facto deposition. Suddenly, what he wrote in the fifth opinion isn't what he "really meant". 

    On the contrary:

    It is the key element to the sede enterprise, and precisely why it is so fanatically defended.

    But that the point has never been made by R&R is nonsense, as I myself have made that point countless times (as have others, like Roman Theo, Siscoe/Salza, et al).

    What he wrote in the 5th opinion is precisely "what he meant," you just don't understand it (and can't let yourself understand it, knowing the admission would be fatal to sedevacantism).

    Therefore, JST must have misunderstood; RR says Cajetan/Bellarmine believe the same thing (i.e., raising a bogus argument nobody is making to slightly deflect the focus, and then offer a rebuttal to it, as though some victory had been won over a non-existant interlocutor), etc. 

    Whatever it taked to save the enterprise.

    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline DecemRationis

    • Supporter
    • ****
    • Posts: 2332
    • Reputation: +880/-146
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #96 on: May 12, 2023, 03:40:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Before commentnig, is it the extent of the hierarchy which has fallen into modernism which concerns you, such that you believe a threshhold has been crossed, after which point the church has defected?

    I wouldn't call it the "extent" per se, but of course that's implicated. 

    I'll use an example. Let's say Honorius taught erroneously regarding the timing of the saint's entry into the beatific vision, and did so publicly. The indefectibility of the Church would not be implicated. However, let's say Honorius's erroneous teaching was taught in an ecuмenical council, and in a universal catechism. And let's say Honorius approved of a rite of the Mass which departed from the Eucharistic form of the words of Our Lord, such as the vernacular NO masses with their "for you and for all" in the consecration of the wine. And let's say Honorius, as head of the Church, officially signed an accord with the Lutherans which contradicted prior Church teaching on justification . . . we could go on and on and on. I think you get the picture.

    Yes, we have a moral unanimity of the bishops behind these teachings. But it's the official, Magisterial nature of the errors, their prescriptive and authoritative level, such that effectively they are the teachings of what is now the ecclessia docens of the Church, and not some "private" error of a pope. 

    Rom. 3:25 Whom God hath proposed to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to the shewing of his justice, for the remission of former sins" 

    Apoc 17:17 For God hath given into their hearts to do that which pleaseth him: that they give their kingdom to the beast, till the words of God be fulfilled.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11527
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #97 on: May 12, 2023, 03:59:00 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • But that the point has never been made by R&R is nonsense, as I myself have made that point countless times (as have others, like Roman Theo, Siscoe/Salza, et al).
    Perhaps "never" was an exaggeration.  It makes sense that Siscoe and Salza/Roman Theo made that "point" since that is where you got the JST quote (translated by....?).

    However, from those debates that I took part in over the last 10 years, the issue was how us sedes can't dogmatize Bellarmine's opinion/position of ipso facto deposition, NOT that he didn't believe in ipso facto deposition.

    ETA:  I see RomanTheo's account is gone. What happened to him? That's too bad.  I'd like to read where he made the point that St Bellarmine really didn't mean ipso facto deposition.


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #98 on: May 12, 2023, 05:13:57 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • However, from those debates that I took part in over the last 10 years, the issue was how us sedes can't dogmatize Bellarmine's opinion/position of ipso facto deposition, NOT that he didn't believe in ipso facto deposition.

    I'd like to read where he made the point that St Bellarmine really didn't mean ipso facto deposition.

    Once again, you are misconstruing that which is really being argued:

    Nobody is claiming that Bellarmine doesn't believe in ipso facto deposition, but per John of St. Thomas:

    "Hence, Bellarmine and Suarez are of the opinion that, by the very fact that the Pope is a manifest heretic and declared to be incorrigible, he is deposed [ipso facto] by Christ our Lord without any intermediary, and not by any authority of the Church."

    In other words, the moment the fact of the Pope's heresy is declared, Christ ipso facto deposes him.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47137
    • Reputation: +27937/-5208
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #99 on: May 12, 2023, 05:22:11 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Once again, you are misconstruing that which is really being argued:

    Nobody is claiming that Bellarmine doesn't believe in ipso facto deposition, but per John of St. Thomas:

    "Hence, Bellarmine and Suarez are of the opinion that, by the very fact that the Pope is a manifest heretic and declared to be incorrigible, he is deposed [ipso facto] by Christ our Lord without any intermediary, and not by any authority of the Church."

    In other words, the moment the fact of the Pope's heresy is declared, Christ ipso facto deposes him.

    Too bad Bellarmine never used the term "declared".  That's a little tidbit injected by John of St. Thomas.  He simply said that the Pope in question had to be incorrible, i.e. unwilling to be corrected, but nowhere in the statement of the 5th opinion did Bellarmine state that he had to be declared such.

    Bellarmine stated that only after he had been ipso facto deposed could the Church judge him.  It's right there in his statement of the 5th opinion.  He also cited as proof text the declaration of Pope St. Celestine, who declared that Nestorius had lost authority from the moment he began preaching heresy (several years before he was officially removed from his material occupancy of the office).

    Your desperation is pathetic.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #100 on: May 12, 2023, 05:29:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Too bad Bellarmine never used the term "declared".  That's a little tidbit injected by John of St. Thomas.  He simply said that the Pope in question had to be incorrible, i.e. unwilling to be corrected, but nowhere in the statement of the 5th opinion did Bellarmine state that he had to be declared such.

    Bellarmine stated that only after he had been ipso facto deposed could the Church judge him.  It's right there in his statement of the 5th opinion.  He also cited as proof text the declaration of Pope St. Celestine, who declared that Nestorius had lost authority from the moment he began preaching heresy (several years before he was officially removed from his material occupancy of the office).

    Your desperation is pathetic.

    Your desperation is pathetic, as Plenus Venter has already refuted your Nestorius error back on p.3...using St. Robert Bellarmine:


    "Nestorius was a bishop. St Robert's doctrine on deposition of bishops is very clear:

    "...if the pastor is a bishop, they (the faithful) cannot depose him and put another in his place. For Our Lord and the Apostles only lay down that false prophets are not to be listened to by the people, and not that they depose them. And it is certain that the practice of the Church has always been that heretical bishops be deposed by bishop's councils, or by the Sovereign Pontiff" - De Membris Ecclesiae, Lib I De Clericis, Cap 7 (Opera Omnia, Paris: Vives, 1870, pp 428-429).

    Add to that the common sense of Cajetan: "... a heretical Pope is not deprived (of the Papacy) by divine or human law... Other bishops if they become heretics are not deprived ipso facto by divine or human law; therefore, neither is the Pope. The conclusion is obvious, because the Pope is not in a worse situation than other bishops" - On the Comparison of the Authority of Pope and Council, Ch XIX

    So your example does not help your cause, but rather confirms the fact that the judgement of the Church precedes the deposition. Yet if they are a danger to our faith, we separate from these pastors, as is clearly the teaching of St. Robert, and of Archbishop Lefebvre. Who knows if the Pope (or bishops), after being given admonitions, will not repent and so not be deposed at all.

    You imagine that the judgement that these theologians say the Church can make (a Council or a future Pope), you are permitted to make now. But that is a complete and utter fantasy of yours supported by no theology or common sense whatsoever. It would be complete and utter anarchy and the end of the Church."

    As for your quip that John of St. Thomas has falsified St. Bellarmine's position, I'd say the onus is upon you to prove it.

    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47137
    • Reputation: +27937/-5208
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #101 on: May 12, 2023, 05:32:28 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In Bellarmine's own words, while rejecting the opinion of Cajetan, whom Salza and Siscoe (and Sean Johnson) laughably attribute to him:
    Quote
    The argument from authority is based on St. Paul (Titus, c. 3), who orders that the heretic be avoided after two warnings, that is, after showing himself to be manifestly obstinate — which means before any excommunication or judicial sentence.

    He defines manifestly obstinate as BEFORE ANY EXCOMMUNICATION OR JUDICIAL SENTENCE.

    Case closed.  John of St. Thomas was wrong when he claimed that that the Pope had to be DECLARED incorrigible.  Alternatively, your translation of John of St. Thomas is completely bogus, the work of more Salza butchering.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47137
    • Reputation: +27937/-5208
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #102 on: May 12, 2023, 05:35:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • As for your quip that John of St. Thomas has falsified St. Bellarmine's position, I'd say the onus is upon you to prove it.

    Just did.  Nowhere did Bellarmine state the he had to be delcared incorrigible / obstinate / pertinacious, but instead, as per above stated explicitly that he would SHOW HIMSELF to be manifestly obstinate BEFORE ANY JUDICIAL SENTENCE.

    Produce the original Latin of that passage from John of St. Thomas, just to make sure you're not slandering him to further your own agenda.

    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11527
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #103 on: May 12, 2023, 05:35:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Once again, you are misconstruing that which is really being argued:

    Nobody is claiming that Bellarmine doesn't believe in ipso facto deposition, but per John of St. Thomas:

    "Hence, Bellarmine and Suarez are of the opinion that, by the very fact that the Pope is a manifest heretic and declared to be incorrigible, he is deposed [ipso facto] by Christ our Lord without any intermediary, and not by any authority of the Church."

    In other words, the moment the fact of the Pope's heresy is declared, Christ ipso facto deposes him.
    My bad.  Ipso facto deposition without prior declaration is what I meant. I should have been clearer. 

    That has been this board's understanding of Bellarmine's position/opinion (except perhaps Chips and Salsa/the banned? "RomanTheo")

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15060
    • Reputation: +10006/-3163
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology
    « Reply #104 on: May 12, 2023, 05:37:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In Bellarmine's own words, while rejecting the opinion of Cajetan, whom Salza and Siscoe (and Sean Johnson) laughably attribute to him:
    He defines manifestly obstinate as BEFORE ANY EXCOMMUNICATION OR JUDICIAL SENTENCE.

    Case closed.  John of St. Thomas was wrong when he claimed that that the Pope had to be DECLARED incorrigible.  Alternatively, your translation of John of St. Thomas is completely bogus, the work of more Salza butchering.

    Your brain might be closed, but the case surely isn't, since the Scripture you cite is used to demonstrate the exact opposite:

    There is no deposition until the declaration; once there is a declarationl the deposition is ipso facto by Christ.

    Its really not that difficult...unless for you this is really just protective stupidity.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."