Clever use of ellipses and taking quotes of context. You're just a bunch of abject liars. St. Robert states explicitly in his articulation of the 5th opinion that the only way a Council can judge a pope is because he's already been judged by God. You're utterly ridiculous.
What's at issue is whether the establishment of pertinacity requires some kind of formal process or judgment by the Church. So if you want to argue that, go for it. But to assert that Bellarmine holds that a Pope is not removed from office until he's judged is the exact opposite of Bellarmine's opinion and nothing but a shameless lie. You're really pathetic.
Of course, this is a total distraction by the heretics Venter and Johnson ... because all this discussion is about whether the Pope can become a heretic as private person. For you to assert that a Pope could teach heresy and error to the Church, could corrupt the Magisterium, and corrupt the Mass ... Bellarmine would be having your heretical posteriors burned at the stake. Your're both shameless heretics and keep hiding behind what's ultimately an irrelevant discussion of personal heresy. This isn't a question of Jorge making heretical statements on his plane or in interviews with Scalfari. This is about the corruption of the Church's Magisterium and Public Worship. Your position on that is heretical. Trent even issued an explicit anathema against the latter proposition. You've been adequately correct on the matter, and yet you remain pertinacious and obstinate; consequently, you are both manifest heretics.
Topic: Francis Includes Schismatic Heretics in Martyrology (Read 14323 times)