Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Former Swedish Lutheran -- the Catholic Faith is eminently logical  (Read 769 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is from 11 years ago but it still reads fresh.

    I found an interesting article in a 2010 CFN paper regarding Sten Sandmark, where he says a number of things that are frankly refreshing, the kinds of things that we Catholics long to hear uttered by converts from Protestantism.  He was at the time just about to become ordained in the SSPX after having spent the previous 4 years in the seminary. At the end of the article (which is small and rather incomplete) it says to see the full version online at www.cfnews.org/sandmark.html and so I searched for that and got an error message. When you go to the CFN website and search for any archives at all, you now get a message that says they had a crash and so they lost all their online archives. That sounds pretty bad. Now the only CFN articles you can get are the ones linked on their home page.

    John Vennari has always relied principally on his print version for content, and has never offered any subscription option for an online edition. So his articles are basically hard copy versions. But like here, where I would like to share a story, I would have to literally type out the whole thing to share it on this website.

    But then when I come to a hard copy article that I want to know more about, it's frustrating to see at the end of an abbreviated article "see the whole version online," especially when I don't have an Internet connection at hand!! Then to top it off, going to the website finding that the article no longer exists because their archives crashed is stupid icing on the stupid cake.

    Anyway, Sten Sandmark has apparently been ordained, but I can't find any information on that story, nor can I find out whether he and/or his friend, Joacim Svensson, has spent time in Sweden during the past 7 years since 2010.

    If anyone knows news of this please post it here!

    The strong answers Joacim Svensson provides below are AMPLIFIED by Sten Sandmark in the article I read in the CFN from 4 years later. Therefore, the seminary time that Sandmark (and Svensson?) spent with the SSPX had the effect of confirming him (them?) in his (their?) convictions, which is a very good and welcome sign, methinks.

    Source: http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2006/12/former-swedish-lutheran-tells-his.html
    Quote

    A former Swedish Lutheran tells his story

    From the December 2006 issue of "The Angelus"

    In October 2006, The Angelus covered the conversion of a Lutheran pastor (Sten Sandmark) and his associate (Joacim Svensson) in Sweden. Joacim is now studying at St. Mary's College in St. Mary's, Kansas, ... in preparation to enter the seminary. We asked him some questions about his conversion and his thoughts and impressions about the Faith.

    Joacim, the story of a conversion in our days of crisis is so extraordinary, I hardly know where to begin. Tell us about your family background and religious upbringing.
    I had no religion in my upbringing whatsoever. I was confirmed in the Lutheran Church when I was 14, and that was a path to belief in Christ.

    What led you to getting "confirmed"?
    I just felt it was the right thing to do–and it was almost a calling. There were about 200 of us that were confirmed that year. And I was the only one of 200 who remained…Lutheran.

    How does Sweden fare in religious practice?
    Among the 9 million Swedes, 7 million are Lutherans. It was a National Church for 500 years (from c. 1520) until 2000. In reality, about 700,000 Lutherans are practicing their faith.

    Why did it stop being a national church?
    There was a separation that was agreed to by both Church and State. The Church wanted to be more liberated because the politicians, the Social Democratic party, ruled the Church. In 1958, the Lutheran Church decided to have women priests. All the professors, bishops, etc., were against it, but the politicians forced it.

    Was there a schism?
    No, there wasn't a problem; the "hard-liners" were marginalized. In the beginning they allowed those priests who didn't want to work with women priestesses to be left alone. Now, not anymore. Now every priest has to work with a woman priestess, and so now you have to sign a paper that you accept working with women priests. ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ couples will soon follow.

    So five years ago there was resistance, at least token, to these reforms–and now?
    Well, the bishops are all Social Democrats. If a bishop said he didn't want to ordain a woman, he was removed; and they would find a priest willing to ordain women, and so they would consecrate him. Remember, 500 years of Church and State joined meant that the political influence in the hierarchy was (and is) enormous. Most of the bishops and priests are Freemasons. In the population of the Lutheran Church, there has been a drop of one million members in the last 15-20 years, and there will be more and more as time goes on.

    How have your parents reacted?
    Well, that I wanted to join a monastery was quite a thing. So they don't care–whatever makes you happy. It's the typical Swedish mentality.

    So why are you now in St. Mary's?
    I was put here by Fr. Schmidberger so that I could learn English better, and so that after awhile I can join the seminary–perhaps in one or two years from now.

    Well, for the readers who can't hear you speak, I can testify that you're making great progress! Can I ask you a bit more about the former Pastor Sandmark?
    Well, for starters, he is now a seminarian at Zaitzkofen [the Society's German seminary– Ed.].

    How long will he study?
    As of right now, one to two years, and then he will be ordained. I have been told that he makes great progress in Zaitzkofen. I am not surprised; he is a Swede made of iron!

    It must be quite a thing to go from being a pastor for 31 years to going back to the seminary.
    Yes, indeed. We had a very large parish–a town of 25,000, with a parish of 12,500.

    Twelve thousand! So St. Mary's is really a "small parish" compared to what you came from?
    Yes, that's true. Pastor Sandmark was the chief "priest" of our parish. We had a common life together–much like Catholic religious. We didn't have wives or children–our monastery was always open to people who wanted to come. We often had people for dinner and were often invited to dinner. We were very "popular" because the people perceived that they could come to us anytime and we would make time for them. Whereas for most Lutheran pastors, the big goal is to have a big salary, and a wife, and lots of children–so they do not care as much about the faithful, honestly.

    We, of course, wanted to save souls, and we wanted a more ascetic religious life.

    I can't imagine relations were good with your fellow pastors…
    We had some disagreements. It was very hard for them to accept that we wanted to live a religious life, and this was a problem because Pastor Sandmark was a beloved pastor of many faithful–people would go to his "mass," but not to the others.


    To clarify for our readers, when you say "mass," you mean of course the Lutheran service.
    Yes; however, what is interesting is that it is far more traditional than the Novus Ordo. We still have grand altars, and communion rails...

    The [...] Catholic bishop in Sweden some years back rejected Sten Sandmark's desire to be Catholic in favor of ecuмenism. How do you view this bishop now that you are Catholic, and what do you think of ecuмenism?

    Well, about 12 years ago, five people went to the Catholic Bishop saying they wanted to be Catholic. He told us to "hold our horses," and said that we could be "Catholic in our hearts." The highest Catholic authority told us this, and hence we assumed this was a right thing to do. So instead of founding an Augustinian Catholic monastery, these five founded the monastery within the Lutheran Church. Some died, some left, so he was alone until I came almost three years ago.

    So the only "support" the bishop gave us in becoming Catholic was sending a Christmas card every year.

    That's very sad–to hear that some people wanted to become Catholic but were barred by those who should have welcomed them in. I'm sorry.

    We had been studying Catholic doctrine, and we were afraid because we thought that "outside the Catholic Church there is no salvation"–and we did not want to be outside! But it seems that these Catholic bishops today think it's not true. It's a really strange behavior. There are 80,000 Catholics in Sweden; most of them are from the Eastern countries, but with a climate like this, of course there are no conversions.

    As a convert, what's your perspective on ecuмenism?
    Well, there is false ecuмenism and real ecuмenism; we see false ecuмenism all the time. But real ecuмenism is to belong to the real Church of Christ founded on St. Peter. To take another view of ecuмenism, while we were Lutherans, we invited the Bishop to our house seven times. He did come to the town once, but he did not stop by. Instead, he went to celebrate Mass at the parish of a priest who was the chaplain of the Freemasonic lodge in the town. We warned him about it, but he did not care. He was shaking hands with them and laughing with them.
    We said to him afterwards that we thought that the Catholic Church, which has the eternal truths, cannot deal with Freemasons. He said that the Lutheran Church has another opinion, that is that Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is "okay," and so out of respect for Lutherans, we should obey that guideline of the Catholic bishop.

    That's really unbelievable. He put up obstacles to your conversion. What do you think are the biggest obstacles that are put up to the convert these days?
    Ecuмenism, of course–that you are free to belong to any sect. The Catholic Church has abandoned its supremacy and its teaching " extra ecclesiam nulla salus." It seems as though the Church is doing everything to keep people out of her. They allow adherence to heresy. It used to be that they would fight against the heresy, but now they are friends with the heresy. As a former heretic, it seems so strange to me that the Church wants to be friendly and go down the road of heresy, especially with Vatican II, the ecuмenical meeting in Assisi, and the joint declaration on the doctrine of justification with the Lutherans 1999.

    What compounds this is our attitude in Sweden. We are very secularized and westernized–we want the newest car, television, movie, etc. There are some movements in Sweden that want spirituality, that want to go back to their "roots," but all over Sweden it is very bad and anti-Christian.

    There was an exhibition not too long ago, which the Lutheran Church was paying for, called " Ecce Homo." It was composed of portraits of Christ as naked–terrible, blaspheming pictures. This was terrible, and at least the Catholic bishop spoke up against it, and the Pope took back his invitation to the Swedish Lutheran "Archbishop" to come to Rome that year. Yet this is what Lutheranism does. It is trying to attack Christianity even in its roots of respect for Christ.

    Are there any articles of Faith you found particularly difficult to understand?
    Not at all. We always had table readings or lectures about Catholic teachings and dogma. I "ate it up," as you might say. I had no hesitation whatsoever. We have seen the heresy and worked with the heresy, so for us the Catholic Faith is eminently logical and full of sense. We really love and are attached to the Catholic doctrine and dogmas.

    Were there any that struck you as particularly beautiful?
    Mary was really the most important thing in our life, especially her Immaculate Conception and her Assumption. She was our guidance. We really loved her; it was something we tried to introduce into the parish. We bought statues of Mary, and it was acceptable to some parishioners. It was a chance to proclaim the truths we knew. But I have to tell you that the reason we survived in the Lutheran Church all these years was the daily rosary. Without it, we would not have been able to persevere to our conversion.

    How do you view Confession now, especially coming from a sect that was born (among other reasons) from a fear and misunderstanding of it?
    We had "confession," but later on we discovered that it was not valid. Luther had confession, the Lutheran "orthodox" took it away. Very old German parishes that are Lutheran still have confession; there were confessions for the first 100 years of the Protestant Revolt.
    We certainly had good intentions in administering it, but it is very jarring to discover, as Pastor Sandmark did after 31 years, that he was never a priest.

    Both former Pastor Sandmark in his last sermon to your parish [See The Angelus, October 2006, p.44] and Bishop Tissier de Mallerais in his sermon receiving you into the Church mentioned priestesses and blessings of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ unions.Can you give us a little bit of background to the progression of this in Europe?

    To be honest, it has just come to a head in the last five years. Ten years ago, even if you mentioned the question, people would shake their heads no. But now we have to be "kind and nice" to everybody, and the highest Lutheran Church council in Sweden, which is made up of a majority of Social Democrats, voted yes.

    What is the Faith like in Europe? How does it compare with America?
    To believe in God is very natural in America. In Europe, you cannot say that. The definition of God in Europe is that maybe he is a woman, maybe he is whatever–whatever you might want him to be. But in America, it is natural to have a "faith" here; we believe in a God. If you said "Jesus Christ is my personal Lord and Savior" in Europe you would be considered crazy.
    What is worse, again, is that the Lutheran Church is abandoning Christ. They thought they were following Christ by leaving the Catholic Church in 1517, but now they are abandoning Christ more than ever.

    So I don't like Lutherans, you might say. I was in Wittenberg. You can still see the gate above which Luther nailed his 95 Theses; there is a crucifix there, and they took out Our Lady and St. John, and there you find Luther and Melancthon instead. That should tell you a lot about the Lutheran mentality.

    What is your take on the Muslims?
    Well, of course, Europe was founded by monasteries, not mosques, that's first of all. Now they are sneaking into society, building mosques all over Europe. They are infiltrating schools and our society. It's terrible, I think. The most terrible thing is that the Conciliar Church is accepting all of this. They have totally forgotten about Lepanto…

    Or John Sobieski, or Charles Martel…
    Yes. Indeed, the crime rate has gone up dramatically when we started accepting Muslims in Europe. In Paris there is an area called Montmartre…

    Where Sacré-Coeur is?
    Yes. They say that when you go to Montmartre you are "leaving Europe."

    Because of the Muslim population?
    Yes. It is terrible, really. Europe was founded by monasteries, not mosques or ѕуηαgσgυєs. And now we see the Pope has to keep excusing himself just for quoting the old emperor. So instead of this conversation of conversion which is necessary for your soul–perhaps being out amongst them, discussing the Faith–instead, we want to have this nice get-together and drink champagne and eat cheese and laugh and joke. I think it is terrible. The Conciliar Church is refusing to tell the truth about the Faith. It does not dare to talk about the truth.

    So here you are now as a college student, after having lived as an Augustinian monk for two and a half years. What are your plans?
    First, I have to say it was a great shock for me to leave a monastery and cross the Atlantic and end up in America. I must say that I am not used to the American lifestyle; it is something I also have to learn from my visit here.

    We (Pastor Sandmark and myself) currently plan to be SSPX priests.

    And as for the Augustinian order? Does Pastor Sandmark wear his habit or a cassock at Zaitzkofen?

    No, a cassock. As I said, he will be an SSPX priest first. Whether we will reconstitute the Augustinians in Sweden is an open question (but I personally do not think so), but I certainly hope to continue my apostolate there eventually.
    St. Dominic was my confirmation saint because I want to fight against heresy–because we lived in it for so long. So it is our (seminarian Sandmark's and my) vocation to fight against heresy and save souls.

    Yes, and he had a special devotion to Our Lady, as you mentioned earlier was so important to you.

    Ah, yes, the love for Our Lady. There is not love anywhere in the Lutheran Church for Mary, a mother who takes care of her children. We have turned to her many times. Look, the history of our monastery is not isolated. To go back for a moment: do you know of Taizé?

    Yes.
    Taizé was like us, in a way. Some of them wanted to be Catholic, but they were told not to be, and so they made this weird, strange "protestant monastery." There are nine monasteries of the Lutheran Church in Sweden that wanted to become Catholic but were refused. There were more convents and monasteries in the Lutheran Church than the Catholic Church. It's crazy, right is wrong and wrong is right…
    Well, it sounds like Sweden needs you…

    Yes, hopefully I will have a chance to do go back. Two hundred years ago we sent missionaries to Africa, now Africa is sending "missionaries."

    "Muslimmaries"?
    Yes. They are sending them to Europe. And we must rechristianize Europe.

    Monasteries, not mosques.

    Joacim, it has been a distinct pleasure.
    Mine as well.

    Conducted by Stephen L.M. Heiner, in St. Mary's, Kansas, October, 2006. Email for Joacim can be directed to TrueRestoration@gmail.com, c/o Stephen Heiner.

    _________________________________
    Rorate Cæli Disclaimer: "Dear Readers: We are in no way associated with The Angelus magazine or with Angelus Press, and have never received nor will ever receive any kind of monetary benefit from them."
    Posted by New Catholic at 12/31/2006 09:36:00 PM  

    - See more at: http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2006/12/former-swedish-lutheran-tells-his.html#sthash.tSEx45b7.dpuf

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8276/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Former Swedish Lutheran -- the Catholic Faith is eminently logical
    « Reply #1 on: March 16, 2017, 11:28:21 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There is a Vimeo you can watch on the DICI website, an interview with Fr. Sandmark:

    http://www.dici.org/en/news/interview-with-sten-sandmark/

    The CFN article I mentioned in the OP above is in the October 2010 issue (6 years ago) on page 12:

    SSPX Ordains Former Lutheran Pastor
    Converted to Catholicism in 2006, Ordained in 2010

    Special to Catholic Family News

    Sten Sandmark, the 63 year-old convert to the Catholic Faith, was ordained by the Society of St. Pius X's Bishop Bernard Fellay on June 26 at Zaitzkofen, Germany.

    Father Sandmark had been a Lutheran Pastor in Sweden for 31 years and formally abjured Protestantism in the SSPX's Church of St. Nicholas du Chardonnet, in Paris on July 30, 2006.

    He studied for years at the SSPX seminary in Zaitzkofen, was ordained this past June, and celebrated his first Solemn Mass on Sunday, August 15 at the same church in Paris where he abjured Protestantism.

    Four years ago, he gave his final sermon to his Lutheran Congregation in July 16, two weeks before he entered the Church.

    He told his people, "As there is only ONE God, there is also only ONE Redeemer, our Lord Jesus Christ. Thus there is also only ONE religion instituted by the Son of God Himself, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church the mystical Body of the Lord. (1 Cor. 12:27) Only St. Peter received the power to lead the flock. (Jn. 21:15-17)  He founded the local church in Rome, where he was to be martyred. In the Roman Pope we find the legitimate sucessor of St. Peter.

    "It is necessary to belong to this Church for salvation. 'He that heareth you, heareth Me; and he that despiseth you, despiseth Me; and he that despiseth Me, despiseth Him that sent Me.' (Lk. 10:16) In 1517, Martin Luther separated himself from this Church, to his own detriment, both in doctrine, worship and discipline. Many countries were separated from the Church through this unfortunate action. As a consequence, innumerable sects have been founded, all of whom refer themselves to Christ. There is no continuous line of apostolic succession in unity with the successor of St. Peter and Christ Himself to be found in these sects. Not even the Swedish church has any such apostolic succession."

    DICI recently posted an interview with Father Sandmark in which he relates the long process of his conversion to Catholicism.

    His journey toward the true Church started in his mother's womb, he said. When his mother was expecting him, she had a dream he would one day become a Catholic priest.. He also recounts that throughout his life, even as a Lutheran pastor, he always read Catholic literature.

    As a Lutheran, he had made contatct with the "official" Catholic Church, with the present Bishop of Stockholm, Sweden, and with his predecessor. Both of these bishops urged Sandmark to remain Protestant, not to convert to the Catholic Faith.

    "None of them wanted me to convert," said Father Sandmark. "They wanted me to remain a Lutheran Minister with Catholic leanings. They were very friendly, but they don't really see a need for converts. They just want a good relation with other religious groups."

    The Catholic Bishop of Stockholm was the chairman for the Ecuмenical Movement in Sweden. He wanted things to remain "peaceful and calm," to maintain a "good order" with Catholic/Lutheran relations.

    This is contrary to the Catholic view, he says. If we find someone interested in converting, we see to it that they convert as soon as possible.

    There were two primary developments in contemporary Lutheranism that propelled his conversion to Catholicism.

    The first was the acceptance of so-called women "priests." "Today, in the Lutheran 'church,' 50% of the clergy are women."

    The second was the Lutherans' acceptance of "same-sex marriage." As a pastor, "I would have had to conduct ceremonies for same-sex couples and I couldn't. That was impossible for me."

    When still a Lutheran, he learned of the Society of St. Pius X when a group of SSPX pilgrims visiting the tomb of Saint Bridget passed through his town. He contacted Father Schmidberger and afterwards advanced his conversion to the Catholicism which occurred a year later.

    As a former Lutheran, who recognizes Protestantism when he sees it, he tells people not to attend the New Mass. "It is very, very close to a Protestant service," he says. He also expressed his belief that Lutherans helped develop the New Mass inside the Catholic Church.

    Sather Sandmark commented on the futility of today's ecuмenism. As Catholics, our dogmas have one meaning that comes from Scripture, Tradition and the Magisterium. Catholics are united in truth, and the dogmas of the Faith are what all Catholics must believe.

    Protestantism, however, has no such system. Within Protestantism, everyone can believe what he or she likes, so Protestantism can have as many meanings as there are individuals. This is why talks between Catholics and Protestants are pointless, "because what shall we talk about? Shall we talk about your personal faith?"

    He amplifies, "I had my conference in Sweden many years ago in a Protestant (non-Lutheran) church. They wanted me to tell them about how things are in the Lutheran 'church.' I responded, 'What part shall I talk about? In the Lutheran 'church,' there are 10 different directions; from very liberal to very Anglo-Catholic."

    He says that today's ecuмenical meetings go nowhere because they seldom talk about Faith. They release papers from their gatherings that always dodge difficult questions. In ecuмenical conferences, he says, "they are just having some nice coffee together."

    He was thus disappointed to see Pope Benedict XVI visit the Lutheran church in Rome this past spring. "I was surprised. I don't know why he did it. I have not seen any explanation why he did it."

    He sends a message to Lutherans that he has found truth in the Catholic Church and that they should join him. "But I did not find it in the modernist, liberal Catholic Church, I found it in Tradition. And if you really want to find the truth, you must come and see, come to our Masses, come to our conferences, talk to the priests of the Society who have the truth."

    He closes the interview with a message to Traditional Catholics, "It is not necessary to be anxious when you talk to people. I found it that the Lord and the Mother of God are with us in all of our talking with people, do not be anxious."

    To modernist Catholics the traditionalist can say, "We have the truth and you liberals don't have it. You are a sort of Protestant group inside the Catholic Church."


    The smaller font message follows:
    "An interview with Father Sandmark can be viewed at
    wwwcfnews.org/sandmark.htm" but trying that address
    I got a page apologising for the lost data when a crash
    lost all their archives.


    There is something about Fr. Sandmark's story that has an urgent appeal, that he has something to offer that is very much needed in our outlook toward Protestants these days.  Understanding his perception of our current state of affairs might be very helpful when we speak to Protestants.

    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.