Author Topic: FishEaters Insanity (Read 27989 times)

Carolus Magnus · « **Reply #105 on:** June 21, 2007, 05:31:07 PM »

Once you come to understand the measure of God's love for you then you will no longer crave the fickle love of the world which will no longer hold any value in comparison and then you will be free from the servitude under which the ego which craves the love of the world places you and so seperates you from God causing your soul to be in much torment.

You can never do enough to satisfy the demands of the ego or the body both of which will rule you like a tyrant whose lusts can never be satiated, seek instead the just and merciful king, that is Our True Lord Jesus Christ and submit yourself to his rule so that you might be free of the twin tyrants, against whom Our Lord will protect his faithful servants.

So many actions in this life are done by people seeking the favor of the world, but what is this favor worth, what reward does the world bestow on us for acting as it wishes that can compare to the supreme blessedness which God has promised us if we serve him faithfully.

Salt when thrown into the water becomes indistinguishible from it, Catholics who are called to be the salt of the earth, easily absorb the spirit of the world when unnecessarily in contact with it.

Incognito · « **Reply #106 on:** June 25, 2007, 01:06:32 PM »

I just wanted to add a little to this thread. Mike, I commend your spirit, however, I think Clare has a point. You could stand to be a bit more charitable, and I mean that in the most charitable way.

With that said, it is disturbing to say the least, that this whole thing on FE was announced publicly. Yes, it is scandalous and has the potential to cause acceptance of such a choice as a Catholic solution. I've thought about it with some intent on trying to understand why someone would choose to marry civilly while one is seeking an annulment. They're obviously certain that they are going to obtain an annulment and feel this is the way to have the benefits of being "married," whether that entails relations between the two or not. Too many things wrong with that to mention, besides Mike has them covered. Unless they don't intend to ever live together, in which case opens another can of worms in the legal sense. I don't think that is the intention though judging by Tracy's desire to live as man and wife with Joe in ever sense, as she stated on FE.

I'm literally stunned by these events.

Clodovicus · « **Reply #107 on:** June 25, 2007, 02:50:10 PM »

Quote from: MichaelSolimanto

Everyone and I mean everyone who goes to Fisheaters needs to post at the gross immorality being posted there in the spirit that many of us have been kicked off their forums for being too Catholic.

Anyone who still has rights there has a need in charity to tell Vox and Quis that getting divorced, and then civilly re-married is immoral, as they already left their current spouses. I tell this to you in the same way as Christ who tells us to tell their brother, and then tell the Church. This is not made for detraction or to hurt their reputations, but we need to say something for the immortal souls of those involved.

My account was already deleted for what I posted on page 2, but I implore you in charity, not in a spirit of putting her down, or anyone down, but to remind her of this deep responsibility we have to our spouses. I have not posted there in a while, but this has to be said. I knew they talked about sɛҳuąƖity immorality a bit too loose over there, but now I know it comes from lifestyles, and not a simple denial of Catholic morals.

Here is the link:
http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/apologia/vpost?id=1958895&trail=14

And what would be gained? That would be trampling women's rights you know. Women run the forum, they are the mods.
They behave as modernists, they are infected with modernism,
and, as such, :rolleyes:we should not violate the spirit of Vatican II, all of that old morality is old and out dated, we need to conform to the demands of the modern world you know, and promoting morality is the dull old corpse of yesteryear, it has to be new now and happening. We should be open to the new possibilities that the law has opened up for us. Divorce is not immoral, we should all change our spouses like we do our shirts, it's the modern fashion. Let's all be ecuмenical, not only doctrinally, but morally, we should be open to the pagan ideas, instead of saying that the old Catholic way is the only way, you can't say that! :really-mad2:

This is the mindset, battling that there is futile, there is nothing to be gained, they will apply the boot :drillsergeant:to whomever does. Fisheaters is a hopeless cause; and it is not Catholic, it is the forum of a couple of women who hold their modernist views as dogma. We must do our part to let everyone know what really goes on there, and what they are all about, and that they do not hold traditional morality.

clare · « **Reply #108 on:** June 25, 2007, 03:20:25 PM »

Quote from: Clodovicus

Women run the forum, they are the mods.

Of course, the forum is now co-owned by a man....!

Quote

it is the forum of a couple of women who hold their modernist views as dogma.

Of the ten moderators, four are women.

You seem to be piling all the blame on the womenfolk!

Clare.

Dawn · « **Reply #109 on:** February 03, 2009, 04:45:53 PM »

Quote from: mariamante

God Bless Michael S. for standing up for truth. I have been following this post from the begining from FE. all the way over here. I think Michael has taken much critisism for defending our faith, He is 100% right about this matter, it is a scandal, a scandal that nobody would know about if Vox had not have made it known. I know somebody personally (a family member) who after having read the post from Vox now thinks that it is ok to get married at the JoP and "make things right later" with a convalidation, I do not know all the facts with Vox's situation however , I don't need to know all the facts to agree that this is indeed scandalis and it does effect others just as Michael S. has graciously pointed out in an early post. It has effected my family personally. I would recommend out of prudence to anyone to stay off Fisheaters and to pray for the site owners and all who have been pursecuted and effected by this scandal. I hope that I haven't been offensive to Vox, Qud or anyone here for that matter, that was not my intention if I did, scandal can spread like cancer and we owe it out of love for God to watch out for one another. I pray for the salvation of all souls and the conversion of all sinners. God Bless

Yes Elizabeth, you are very right. Sin is what brought them down to the level they operate at. Matthew does a good job at bringing us back if we get too wild in our language. Not censoring, exhorting us to be better.

stevusmagnus · « **Reply #110 on:** February 28, 2009, 04:04:00 PM »

I'm getting in on this thread late, however I posted on FE for years and did not know this information until I was "banned" for being too Catholic.

Had I known this I probably would have deleted myself long ago. Kudos to Michael for actually standing up for the truth there and getting "banned" for it. Reading the cheer-leader squad encouraging sin and scandal, even years later was sickening.

I've lost some respect for certain posters involved in the '07 posts. Desperation for human respect gone wild.

What a sad sordid tale. I also agree the pictures and video allowed there are scandalous as well as a lot of the Anti-Catholic and immoral views that are given a free pass.

The whole site needs prayers. I just left and I can tell you that in my almost 3 years there it has progressively gotten worse. Pretty soon it will be just Quis, Vox and a few liberal sycophants left posting to each other.

gladius_veritatis · « **Reply #111 on:** February 28, 2009, 04:56:57 PM »

Quote from: stevusmagnus

The whole site needs prayers.

The whole WORLD is in much the same state, if not worse - and needs MEGA prayers. It will not be long until the rod is applied most firmly to our collective behind. God speed.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #112 on:** June 17, 2012, 03:55:08 AM »

Quote from: clare

Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they're receiving counsel from traditional clergy.

Clare.

If you had any doubt that Clare is a liberal.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #113 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:24:28 PM »

We mustn't give the benefit of the doubt to sinful actions.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #114 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:26:35 PM »

In fact, wasn't it the "We're getting married" thread that led Matthew to create CatholicInfo?

wallflower · « **Reply #115 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:29:57 PM »

How is she giving the benefit of the doubt to sinful actions?

She is giving the benefit of the doubt that they would receive counsel from traditional clergy. Totally different. Whether they listen to that clergy or not is a different story but she at least hopes they receive good counsel. How is that possibly liberal?

Telesphorus · « **Reply #116 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:38:35 PM »

Quote from: wallflower

How is she giving the benefit of the doubt to sinful actions?

So do you deny that getting civilly married and living together when being already married is sinful?

Quote from: Clare

Let's give them the benefit of the doubt and assume that they're receiving counsel from traditional clergy.

Do you know how to read wallflower? What this means is that we're supposed to presume that what they're doing is okay because we should assume they were counseled it was okay by traditional clergy. That is insane.

Quote

She is giving the benefit of the doubt that they would receive counsel from traditional clergy. Totally different. Whether they listen to that clergy or not is a different story but she at least hopes they receive good counsel. How is that possibly liberal?

That's not what she said.

The sad reality is that drunkenness and fornication are the norm in these Trad chapels among the young people. And women with liberal attitudes don't want there to be any social disapproval for it. And they think they're traditional Catholics. The same way Vox thinks she's a traditional Catholic.

Well, they're not. They're liberals.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #117 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:45:22 PM »

As I've said before, posting on FE for a long period of time is dangerous because it can brainwash someone. The first time I ever visited that site, they were talking about shooting games.

I visited it the other day and they were talking about baseball and ESPN. What are topics like that doing on a (so-called) Trad forum? I am glad I never posted there.

Matthew · « **Reply #118 on:** June 17, 2012, 07:16:04 PM »

"We're getting married" thread on FE started July 07

CathInfo started August 06.

Do the math :)

To answer your question, I started CathInfo to allow more latitude to the "Resistance Movement" type topics -- cօռspιʀαcιҽs, etc. Vox had locked that sub-forum.

About 6 months later I was banned from FE during a personal argument (discussion) with a female member of Fisheaters. She was crying for me to "get out of her thread!" and stuff like that; I was just laying down Catholic teaching, having an abstract rational discussion.

ServusSpiritusSancti · « **Reply #119 on:** June 17, 2012, 07:55:39 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

"We're getting married" thread on FE started July 07

CathInfo started August 06.

Do the math :)

Oops. Sorry, I had thought it started in 06 for some reason. I would have known it was in 07 had I thoroughly read this thread, but I skimmed over it.