Our youngest daughter asked question on the pope when she was under 10 years old
"If Francis is not the Pope then who is?"
We answered that there is a major crisis in the Church and that there have already been 40 anti popes in history and he will almost certainly join the list. We concluded that we don't need permission from the Pope to be perfectly Catholic.
That was enough to explain.
Children also ask why we go to one church far away and not the one down the road.
You cannot really avoid this conversation so be prepared.
You can explain the entire crisis in the Chruch without even mentioning the pope because the crisis is a DOCTRINAL one, with the papal crisis a secondary issue. Thats how it was understood in the 70s, when Traditionalism started. The entire point of Traditionalism rests on rejecting a fake gospel which contradicts doctrine.
Im more Sede than R&R but the Sede view is NOT the historical view of 1970s Trads. Fr Cekada (RIP) went extremeist and turned the Sede view into a priority decision of Faith. Which it’s not. And never has been.
The fact that your daughter was exposed to Trads who posed the idea of the papal question shows the obsessive nature of it. The faulty idea being “If there were a true pope in Rome, then V2 never would’ve happened.”
That’s a false, simplistic and childish view of the crisis. The papacy of Pius XII, with his many errors and liberalism, directly contradicts this view. But most Sedes ignore Pius XII’s faults because they can’t rationalize their simplistic notion with the complexities of real life.