them serving next to them...

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/female-service-members-say-they-face-retribution-for-reporting-sɛҳuąƖ-assaults/ar-BBj31YS?ocid=SKY2DHP

Now I am not defending sɛҳuąƖ assault in the military but you know you would think these stupid females would realise that hmm, perhaps me trying to be like males and enter a male-dominated institution is abhorrent to some male soldiers and even worse, perhaps me trying to go into a combat role that is unsuited to women (women cannot stand the test of combat since they are not emotionally healthy like men are) and has been a male activity in human history since the Battle of Thermopylae is also abhorrent. This article also does not mention how many female soldiers also have normal, healthy relationships with male soldiers and become pregnant, thanks also to the feminist demand that women have their share of the military lifestyle as well.

What can I say other than I fully agree with Islam that this is a sick nation for allowing women into the military and even worst, into combat, and consider it divine retribution that many women who have entered combat roles have been slaughtered by Muslims in the Middle East. :wink:

I think the idea of women in the military is pretty despicable at face value.  

I wouldn't mind women serving as nurses in time of a legitimate war but even then it would represent a failure of culture and society.  A Catholic girl in the military should be an extreme anomaly but in the novus ordo joining the military is just another career choice.  

Can you imagine women storming Omaha Beach / Normandy?     :roll-laugh1:  

Traditional Guy.

I agree with you on combat.  I am surprised by your statement that women are not emotionally healthy as men are.  Do you really mean that being female is a mental illness, or did I misunderstand you?

Being female is not a mental illness, it is just the way women are and we men should respect that. Men are only capable of rational thought, while women think with their emotions, one reason why women can be more jealous than men. That is why such a scary situation like combat is not right for women as they will be useless in such a situation; of course I am not even mentioning the moral depravity of having women soldiers.

It is ludicrous to say that men are "only" capable of rational thought.  Speaking as a man, I can say with 100% certainly that men are certainly capable of becoming emotional and not thinking rationally.

If, however, you meant to say that, on the whole, men tend to be more rationale and women tend to be more emotional, then you may be right.

It is ludicrous to say that men are "only" capable of rational thought.  Speaking as a man, I can say with 100% certainly that men are certainly capable of becoming emotional and not thinking rationally.

If, however, you meant to say that, on the whole, men tend to be more rationale and women tend to be more emotional, then you may be right.

I mean that because of a woman's emotional nature they are unsuitable for intellectual careers and the military. Only men are capable of this. However I agree that men are capable of emotion and feeling as well (I support a man's emotional feeling of loyalty, patriotism, sacrifice, duty, etc. over intellectualism).

FWIW, none of those things are emotions, or feelings.

And as for emotions and intellect: Even brute beasts have emotions, but only persons - God, angels, and man - have intellect.

Think twice, therefore, before disparaging it.

I will disparage it however. It is noteworthy that the intellect of a cultured man means nothing compared to the crowbar of a thug. Only brute strength matters then.

The crowbar of a thug is very limited and a street savvy person would spot the dumb thug approaching.  All it takes to defeat the thug with a crowbar is for the well-coiffed gentleman donning a bowler is for him to retrieve his revolver, fire it, and as the clanging sound of a dropped crowbar mingles with the mildly pleasant smell of gunpowder, the living gentleman could then smile and proclaim in the general direction of the corpse of the thug, "I think I will take this with me to remind me of how loathesome thugs really are."  

Crowbars are really unweildy things.  Use a claw hammer if you must use your muscles.  A revolver is better still.   :wink:

Most of your street thugs use firearms so if you pull out a revolver then he will pull out a pistol and probably fire first. Who wears bowler hats anyway in your modern world besides businessmen, who show a cowardly nature. :wink: I think street thugs are loathsome however we will one day need the brutal, merciless nature of your thug to take on the liberal government.