CathInfo.com

Presuming priest-approved separation and priest-approved return:
.
If he wants her to come home and she does not want to return, she can't go to the courts and attempt to get money or custody.
.
If she wants to come home and he does not want her to return, he can't seek custody and has to allow her to receive financial support from him as the courts see fit.

Yeah, if a prenup existed, you could enforce the above.  If there is no prenup, then you could not enforce the above because the husband has ZERO LEVERAGE.  And really, the priest has low leverage too.  The woman can ignore both of them, or not.  She can go the courts and get money, or not.  She can destroy a marriage, or not.  COMPLETELY up to her.  This is insanity and is feminism in all its horror on display.

A prenup gives leverage back to the husband, so that the wife cannot control his money (which for an evil woman means she controls him and gets revenge on him), because he is THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY and she does not have the right to destroy the marriage or leave and take the children for non-church approved reasons.  A prenup is more about authority, and the lack of authority over the family that the system gives men (which is their God-given RIGHT).  Thus, it can be argued that a prenup shifts the authority and control of marital discord back to where it belongs - in the hands of the Church and the husband.  

Jaynek, don't evade my last response. Here it is, again:

Jaynek says:

False analogy. Nobody chooses to have a car accident, but one (at least) of the spouses, must choose a divorce.  It is not something that happens to them by accident.

You're deliberately missing the forest for the trees. What matters is the end, not the means. The end is the "divorce" (car accident), not what led to it (means). A prenup protects the man from having his home, money, and everything else stolen from him by the woman. Car insurance protects a person from getting sued, and it pays for damages to their cars.

Jaynek says:

It is prudent to have car insurance because car accidents are beyond one's control.  Divorce is up to the couple.  No matter what the divorce rate is, a couple only gets divorced if one of them chooses it.

Your last sentence supports my argument and nullifies what you said just prior to it. Divorce isn't up to the man when his wife can "divorce" him for any reason, and no reason at all, through no fault of his own. Hence, the divorce is, indeed, beyond his control. Court cases prove it.

Jaynek says:

Making a prenup is preparing for divorce. It shows one believes that at least one of the spouses is capable of choosing divorce.

Yes, it prepares for a "divorce", if it were to unfortunately come, but it's not expecting it. It's only prudent to prepare for the worst, especially when the trend is growing as time passes.  I see you tried to change your language around ("preparing for" replaced "expecting") to make your point valid, but you only supported my point. Thanks.