CathInfo.com

That's precisely the point, that the legal protections in place are not out of line.

You call them "protections" when they are freemasonic, satanic INCENTIVES to leave a marriage that gets temporarily difficult.

Secondly, you insert divorce scenarios where you are blaming the husband-wife, both.  "It's usually equal blame", they say.  No it's not.  If the wife takes the NUCLEAR option to separate/divorce, she is the GUILTY PARTY.  She has destroyed the marriage.  She has violated her vows.  This is the situation we're talking about.  If she does not have a church approved reason to do so, the blame is fully on her for taking such a drastic, selfish action.

You minimize the gravity of immorality which a divorce inflicts upon society and on the marriage.  A bad marriage is much better and has a shot to succeed.  A divorce is final, and the woman will be guilty before God for this.  As such, civil laws should also reflect the gravity of this sin, which they do not, therefore a prenup should exist to de-incentivize a sin which is so commonplace today that it's heinousness is forgotten.

Can anyone give me a scenario where it would be wrong for a woman to get a divorce, take the children, get govt assistance, and 70% of a man's earnings for life?  Is she only wrong if she tries to kill her husband/child?  (She probably get off due to temporary insanity).

Seems to me that in EVERY situation, the husband is to blame and the woman gets rewarded for a divorce.  Sickening.

Great stats, Incredulous.  Certainly Ireland has received greater blessings from God because their Constitution (until recently) upheld the sanctity of life and (still does) disallows divorce.  This goes to show the importance of civil laws in helping catholics to keep the Faith.  I'll bet Spain used to have such laws but they were gotten rid of once the great Franco died and left them defenseless against Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and communism.