Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Distributism article: NE1 got a problem with this article?  (Read 344 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LaramieHirsch

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2718
  • Reputation: +956/-248
  • Gender: Male
    • h
Distributism article: NE1 got a problem with this article?
« on: March 05, 2016, 06:59:19 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Let me put it like this:  I've managed to find myself pitched against some folks in the distributist quarter.  My previous thread touches on this ongoing amusement of mine.  

    But for now, I want you to focus on this article:

    THREE STRATEGIES FOR EVASION  By Thomas Storck


    Here's an excerpt:

    Quote
    Although fifty years after Fr. Cronin wrote no longer does everyone “speak in terms of awe and reverence of the great encyclicals of Popes Leo XIII and Pius XI,” still his words are helpful reminders that Catholics have not always had that docility toward the teaching Church which one would expect from those presumably convinced that the Church speaks with the voice of Christ. And in fact today dissent from those teachings is far more common and more open than was the case when Fr. Cronin wrote those words. While one is hardly surprised to find dissent from Catholic teaching among liberal Catholics, it is just as common to find it among conservative Catholics. These latter, however, since they see themselves as faithful adherents to Catholic doctrine, necessarily must create some strategy of disguising their dissent from Catholic teaching.


    Okay, folks.  Whaddya think?  Agree?  Disagree?  I'm all ears on this one.  Read the article and let me know.

    -LH

    .........................

    Before some audiences not even the possession of the exactest knowledge will make it easy for what we say to produce conviction. For argument based on knowledge implies instruction, and there are people whom one cannot instruct.  - Aristotle