https://cruxnow.com/vatican/2024/01/25-year-old-book-by-vatican-doctrinal-czar-surfaces-on-god-and-orgasms/

These bishops and priests have had their minds in the sewer for decades.

I guess you're not familiar with Christopher West's work on "Theology of the Body".  It's absolutely pornographic.  It compares the marital act to the Eucharist which undoubtedly is blasphemous.

No, I’m not familiar with it, and would like to keep it that way.

I guess you're not familiar with Christopher West's work on "Theology of the Body".  It's absolutely pornographic.  It compares the marital act to the Eucharist which undoubtedly is blasphemous.

West is a complete pervert.  I've only seen one small talk by him, and turned if off after 10 minutes.  He was mocking and deriding the saints who kept custody of the eyes (physically mocking them by making a caricature of what it might look like) and decided that the immersion of the Pascal Candle into the Holy Water at the Easter Vigil was a phallic symbol.  West sees phalluses everywhere ... and is therefore quite possibly a closeted sodomite.

West's Theology of the Body is based on Wojtyła's Wednesday audiences in the early 1980s. TOB is all the rage in the USA Novus Ordo, being taught in parishes and schools.

Yes. It was also taught in homeschool co op in our area. 

New Jersey area “ Catholic” schools  also had United perverted nation sex ed classes long before public schools. 

West is a complete pervert.  I've only seen one small talk by him, and turned if off after 10 minutes.  He was mocking and deriding the saints who kept custody of the eyes (physically mocking them by making a caricature of what it might look like) and decided that the immersion of the Pascal Candle into the Holy Water at the Easter Vigil was a phallic symbol.  West sees phalluses everywhere ... and is therefore quite possibly a closeted sodomite.

Never heard of him until this thread, watched a bit of this video:




Besides implicitly denying the existence of Adam & Eve at 5:35, he lays out three options for dealing with temptations to lust;

1. Consent to the temptations. He says he does not "recommend that"
2. Keep custody of the eyes, "shove down" any lustful thoughts or desires into the "subconsciousness". Doesn't mention praying at all. He also does not "recommend that"
3. Consent to looking at a woman, to thank God for her beauty and the "spousal meaning" of her body(?!), but to reject the temptation to lust that will proceed from looking at the woman. This, he recommends 

Numerous times I have seen  Sirach 3:27 "A hard heart shall fear evil at the last: and he that loveth danger shall perish in it." quoted in works when dealing with occasions of sin. We are obligated to avoid unnecessary proximate occasions of sin, yet Mr. West is recommending willfully placing yourself in one

There's a lot more to it than merely the lascivious that's monopolizing public attention. The book in question is actually dangerous for the following reasons in line with the La Sallette messages:

a) The mystical experiences of the Saints are repackaged as corporeal (of the 6th/9th sort) rather than spiritual.

b) In the chapters with too-much-information about the conjugal act (including when enacted by individuals who have no right to do so under the laws of both the Church and nature), Fernandez references lines of analysis from occult and pagan sources.

c) The book contains a detailed account of a teenage girl's lurid experience that directly blasphemes Our Lord and Our Lady. Timing, again: this latest scandal hits the weekend of the First Friday and First Saturday as well as Sunday's observance of the Feast of the Holy Family. And Bergoglio tries to distract the news cycle by speaking out against gestational surrogacy, of all things?  

The usual media popesplainers are all spinning the scandal as so much silly prurient pearl-clutching over tired old obscure news. The reality is that it's about sins against the First Commandment hiding behind sins of the flesh. And THAT is the real story for anyone who understands what the current occupants of the Vatican are purposefully driving towards.

He was actually a cute kid.

Something happened between the left 2 and then the right 2.  We should pray for him.  It's easy to forget that when we're all busy being outraged by the evil he's perpetrating, but he was someone's child too, and I don't wish the judgment he might get for what he's done on my worst enemy.