If anyone were to stage a fake assasination, it would best be done with a fake bullet to the chest.
Actually the more facts that emerge from the deadly attack, it becomes more and more difficult to cling to the fake assasination narrative.
The perimeter failed to include nearby tall structures.
The Secret Service failed to meet with local SWAT team as scheduled.
The Secret Service failed to coordinate communication with local law enforcement, resulting in failure to communicate info on a suspect with a weapon.
The Secret Service could not get their WIFI to work.
A Secret Service agent abandoned her post to nurse her baby in the Command Center. (We are not told which post was hers.)
Secret Service has not yet interviewed local law enforcement.
The body of Crooks was incinerated (evidence destroyed) 10 days after the incident and no one knows who signed off on that.
and much more (my cookies are beeping).
I'm not going to spend too much time on this, since it's not all that important, but all that the facts you list there indicate is that the event was somehow planned, i.e. that it was not the work of some lone wolf who just got lucky that day.
Question is who planned/staged it and to what end? I am convinced that the events were staged to benefit Trump, based on an analysis of the
cui bono (double layer) as well as later revelations such as that Trump ear, when finally allowed to be seen, didn't have a scratch on it (despite his physician having claimed earlier that a good chunk of it had been torn off, which ballistics simulations suggest should have been the case).
Clearly Trump benefitted the most from this. Now, assuming this was a hit on Trump (by Deep State), had it succeeded, in that case presumably they would have benefitted from Trump's death. But Trump could have been taken out myriad ways, none of which would have brought suspicion, such as using a heart-attack gun while Trump played golf. Nobody could discount the possibility of a fat old guy dropping of a heart attack. So the secondary consideration in the layered
cui bono is that this operation was SO SLOPPY (as you point out), and these people are evil but not stupid, that we can safely infer that they intended to get caught and for people to conclude that this was a staged event. So, then,
cui bono, whom does it benefit, that it be known that the operation was staged? Clearly again Trump. Why? After Trump's first term, where he drained the swamp ... right into his cabinet, went from "lock her up" to "Clintons are good people" the very day after his inauguration, and became the jab-father, much of his base had eroded, with many of his original followers doubting that Trump was actually playing 15-D chess, but believing him to actually be yet another actor or role-player in the Deep State puppet show for the consumption of the goy. But the effect of the assassination attempt was to re-convert or solidify or corral that original base, since nearly every one who had formerly thought that perhaps Trump was just part of Deep State, would now think, "Well, I guess he couldn't have been Deep State since Deep State tried to kill him." So the intent was for it to be thought this had been perpetrated by Deep State, and that's the explanation for how damn sloppy the operation was. It does not benefit Deep State to be discovered as having pulled off the operation. Really the only benefit would have been to make it easier for their candidate to win in November, but if that was the only benefit, they could have done it a dozen ways where they would have incurred very little suspicion.
Topic: Did Our Lady save Trump from assasination? (Read 5610 times)