Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Debate That Will Split The Atom  (Read 12807 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Debate That Will Split The Atom
« Reply #85 on: March 29, 2025, 11:26:09 AM »
I think it would be a benefit for those who converted to EO or are on the fence to hear the truth about the matter. Often I think debates are for persuading the audience, not the opponent. Dyer being a perceived authority for the online apologists have led many men away from Tradition, using the conciliar church as a strawman and saying "their grass is greener." He's built his reputation by defeating ill-prepared debaters, much like Ben Shapiro.

I've come across a few sneaky online EO apologists in the YouTube comment sections avoiding direct questions. The one group tries to lure you into a discord server to dog-pile you, getting you away from the main chat.
That is all true but ultimately it is God who is going to lead you to the true faith and nothing can circuмvent that, especially some dime store theologian like Dyer who has a propensity for wearing bad Hawaiian shirts.
There are tens of millions of people led astray by the gibberish of Joseph Smith, Mary Baker Eddy, Elizabeth Claire Prophet, Paula White, James Martin, etc...take your pick. Are we to debate all of these fools?
"I know mine and mine know me."

Re: Debate That Will Split The Atom
« Reply #86 on: March 29, 2025, 11:44:59 AM »
Which ones do some consider invalid and why?  Mostly the Novus Ordo Rites or also the Traditional?
I’ve never actually heard this distinction in Orthodoxy, I’ve never heard of someone saying the novus ordo is invalid but the traditional rites are valid

the debate as far as I understand it is if you can actually have sacraments or sacramental grace outside the Church to begin with.  in my experience, those who say no usually say no, just across-the-board.  

and to preempt the possible question of whether this belief is donatism, I don’t think so because from what I understand donatism is denying that unworthy ministers IN the church have valid sacraments.  The sacraments of schismatics (which from the EO perspective would be the papacy in general whether novus ordo, sede, or whatever in between grade), would be a separate question


tbh I don’t have a huge dog in the fight myself; im more than willing to admit I just don’t know; but I’ve seen people with very strong opinions on both sides 


Re: Debate That Will Split The Atom
« Reply #87 on: March 29, 2025, 11:45:39 AM »
I’ve never actually heard this distinction in Orthodoxy, I’ve never heard of someone saying the novus ordo is invalid but the traditional rites are valid

the debate as far as I understand it is if you can actually have sacraments or sacramental grace outside the Church to begin with.  in my experience, those who say no usually say no, just across-the-board. 

and to preempt the possible question of whether this belief is donatism, I don’t think so because from what I understand donatism is denying that unworthy ministers IN the church have valid sacraments.  The sacraments of schismatics (which from the EO perspective would be the papacy in general whether novus ordo, sede, or whatever in between grade), would be a separate question


tbh I don’t have a huge dog in the fight myself; im more than willing to admit I just don’t know; but I’ve seen people with very strong opinions on both sides
Admittedly, the amount of abuses that exist in the NO particularly kinda make me hope it’s not valid 

Re: Debate That Will Split The Atom
« Reply #88 on: March 29, 2025, 11:48:09 AM »
That is all true but ultimately it is God who is going to lead you to the true faith and nothing can circuмvent that, especially some dime store theologian like Dyer who has a propensity for wearing bad Hawaiian shirts.
There are tens of millions of people led astray by the gibberish of Joseph Smith, Mary Baker Eddy, Elizabeth Claire Prophet, Paula White, James Martin, etc...take your pick. Are we to debate all of these fools?
"I know mine and mine know me."
Comparing the thousand plus year old RC vs EO debate to those new cults is kinda lazy imo, and I would say the same to any EO who said that about RC

to be clear I’m not a particularly massive fan of Dyer, I’ve listened to him a little bit and I like some of his ideas but I agree he can be obnoxious and I think in general focus on personal piety is better for most people than apologetics.  And as far as it goes I prefer Craig Truglia over Dyer.


but I think the comparison here is just weak

Re: Debate That Will Split The Atom
« Reply #89 on: March 29, 2025, 12:02:51 PM »
Comparing the thousand plus year old RC vs EO debate to those new cults is kinda lazy imo, and I would say the same to any EO who said that about RC

to be clear I’m not a particularly massive fan of Dyer, I’ve listened to him a little bit and I like some of his ideas but I agree he can be obnoxious and I think in general focus on personal piety is better for most people than apologetics.  And as far as it goes I prefer Craig Truglia over Dyer.


but I think the comparison here is just weak
From my experience, Dyer is not much better than those examples. he is a person who is very nasty to Catholics in discords and twitter spaces where he can get away with such. he has very little custody over his foul mouth toward those he sees as opponents and that speaks volumes in and of itself. no amount of books in his background will change how he is mask off.