Of course she went for Chojnowski and not the MHFM video because the Dimonds had a much better presentation.
It's unfortunate that Chojnowski is such an amateur. I love what he's doing but most of the videos he puts out are unbearably boring to watch.
And yeah, I'd point out his inability to promounce and spell words as well.
That being said, Niles didn't give a fair presentation of SLT's evidence but only picked a couple of points which she could explain away.
I don't understand how the two female skulls she keeps showing is supposed to support her position. It's obviously two different people, where's the proof this happens with age? Nowhere. That's why she says the doctors Chojnowski cites are "not entirely right" instead of wrong.
Any Catholic knows this apostate can't be Sr. Lucy since she contradicted the real Sr. Lucy, besides the fact that she looks totally different and her handwriting is also confirmed to be of a different person.
Me and my friends asked impartial people whether the two were the same person and they all said no. People who deny the difference have ulterior motives clearly.
Also. Remember the picture of the Challenger crew survivors before and after their "deaths"? Yeah, they all look the same thirty years later but we're supposed to believe Sr. Lucy conveniently underwent metamorphosis to prop up JPII and his lies.
Yeah... No.
P.S. The Dimonds were the first to publicize that there was an impostor as far as I know and their video on Fatima is top notch.
Topic: CM Debunks Fake Lucy Theory? (Read 7164 times)