Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Clothed  (Read 332 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Clothed
« on: March 11, 2026, 09:51:38 PM »
Has anyone read this book?


‘Clothed with Beauty’ proves women don’t have to choose between modesty and taste


Anna Kalinowska’s new book offers a refreshing alternative to the endless online debates over skirts, trousers, and modesty by recovering the forgotten idea of objective beauty.
Featured ImageCover art from 'Clothed with Beauty: A Catholic Philosophy of Dress'Os Justi Press



Dorothy
cuмmings
McLean

  • Wed Mar 11, 2026 - 11:38 am ED
Listen to this article
(LifeSiteNews) — I loved Anna Kalinowska’s Clothed with Beauty: A Catholic Philosophy of Dress – but I wasn’t sure I was going to.
The marketing fail: a Facebook advertisement showing the book’s illustration of “shape harmony” in women’s wear. On the left, illustrating “lack of shape harmony,” a pink golf shirt modestly pulled out over the waist of a bulky blue skirt. On the right, illustrating “clothing in harmony with the human figure,” a pale mauve fitted dress with three-quarter-length sleeves, a Peter Pan collar, and a softly pleated skirt falling from an unadorned, clearly demarcated waist. Whichever human figure that mauve dress was created for, it wasn’t mine.


However, the promise that this book was going to explain how there is more to Catholic women’s dress than modesty hooked me in. And this is not surprising, for “The Catholic Women’s Clothing Debate” has been raging on the internet since there was an internet, and to judge by the many stories about Padre Pio’s views on trousers, long before.
I was not disappointed: as a Catholic who attends the Traditional Latin Mass, Kalinowska is clearly tuned into the conversation and brings to it intelligence, an artist’s eye, and devotion to goodness, truth, and beauty. She hopes that her readers will “imitate, in each act of dress, their heavenly Creator Who creates nothing that is not beautiful.”


As Kalinowska recounts, it was the discovery of the Traditional Latin Mass – and the inevitable comparison to the “mangled remains” of the current liturgy – that made her realize that today’s grubby fashions, such a contrast to those of the past, were not simply part of an historical evolution. Like Annibale Bugnini’s revolution, post-1962 fashion represents “a rupture.” Looking into the question, the authoress discovered that “just as there were objective principles that guided true liturgical development, there were objective principles that guided the art of dress.” Her hope is that her book is “a small contribution to the work of restoration.”

The work, which is beautifully illustrated, weighs up the current debate between advocates of “modesty-at-all-costs” and of “normalcy-to-win-souls” and proposes a third way: finding and wearing clothing that is both modest and aesthetically pleasing. Using the philosophy of Dietrich von Hildebrand and the art principles of the once-famous Goldstein sisters in their Art in Everyday Life (1930), Kalinowska teaches a short course on harmony, proportion, balance, rhythm, and emphasis. She also investigates the difference between mere elegance and objective beauty in dress: her conclusions may surprise you.
Kalinowska also draws inspiration from “the valiant woman” described in the Book of Proverbs and the traditional habit of nuns – without advocating that laywomen wear them. (Don’t laugh: a young man once asked me after Mass why we women don’t dress like Our Lady. I replied that Our Lady lived in an entirely different climate.) There is also a chapter devoted specifically to men’s dress.
This is very much a book for women in conservative or traditional Catholic communities. (In fact, I think we of the long-skirted set should all have it on our shelves and talk about it after Mass.) It is the first book about fashion that I have ever read that includes a photo of a woman in a chapel veil – and to show what she’s doing wrong, to boot. The poor girl turns up on page 26 wearing that golf-shirt and bulky skirt combo, and I felt seen. (Happily, the model is then given an outfit more in keeping with her mantilla.)
Clothed with Beauty is also for any woman who would prefer to wear Dior’s “New Look” – if not her great-great-grandmothers’ folk costume – than the ugly fast fashion cluttering up every main street from Anchorage to Arkhangelsk. Happily, the book also gives practical advice for finding better clothes.


Recognizing the difficulties of finding elegant (let alone beautiful) clothing today, Kalinowska recommends beginning with one outfit: what we wear to church. And, thus, my fellow TLM adherents were soon treated to the sight of Mrs. McLean in a straight skirt with her blouse tucked in and, in place of bulky boots, fuchsia pumps. I was also inspired by Clothed with Beauty to revisit the National Gallery of Scotland. There I examined the clothing in all the portraits, from the aprons of dancing peasants to the velvet overdress of Napoleon’s mother, and I concluded that Kalinowska is right. Something atrocious has happened to the clothing of humanity, and it is time we took beauty back.


Anna Kalinowska’s Clothed with Beauty: A Catholic Philosophy of Dress (2026, 145 pages) is available for purchase from Os Justi Press.





Offline MaterDominici

  • Mod
  • Supporter
Re: Clothed
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2026, 10:38:08 PM »
I've read the part you can preview for free. :smirk:


Quote
The marketing fail: a Facebook advertisement showing the book’s illustration of “shape harmony” in women’s wear. On the left, illustrating “lack of shape harmony,” a pink golf shirt modestly pulled out over the waist of a bulky blue skirt. On the right, illustrating “clothing in harmony with the human figure,” a pale mauve fitted dress with three-quarter-length sleeves, a Peter Pan collar, and a softly pleated skirt falling from an unadorned, clearly demarcated waist. Whichever human figure that mauve dress was created for, it wasn’t mine.

This is how I was introduced to the book and matches exactly my first impression. 
The preview includes some interesting points, but also some ideas that I think are problematic.


Re: Clothed
« Reply #2 on: Yesterday at 04:03:06 AM »
I've read the part you can preview for free. :smirk:


This is how I was introduced to the book and matches exactly my first impression.
The preview includes some interesting points, but also some ideas that I think are problematic.

What do you think was problematic?

Re: Clothed
« Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 05:15:57 AM »
I have never read it (besides this preview) but wholeheartedly support the concept of combining modesty and beauty. God created women in particular to be beautiful, and being modest and tasteful at the same time, inspires observers with an attraction to virtue. God is Beauty, and His creation ought to be a reflection of His divine perfections. 

Women also tend to act more like ladies when dressed prettily and modestly. Fr. Lasance remarks that women are sweet by nature, and lose that sweetness through tarnishing their purity, and it seems to me that being pretty yet modest helps to preserve this sweetness, just as one would regard with greater care a beautiful diamond, than a piece of steel. 

I am not sure where this untucked shirt, bulky skirt look originated. It is unattractive and boyish.

It is helpful to look at how Our Lady appeared in her various apparitions. One can tell that she is a woman, and her waist is always defined with some kind of an accessory, while the rest of the dress flows effortlessly around. This is a style of dress that is both modest and feminine, and that almost any body type can wear with ease.

Observing the way St. Thérèse of Lisieux and her sisters dressed is helpful as well. Their gentle-hearted, noble father was quite strict regarding modesty. Purity was inculcated in them from an early age by both parents, and as we all know, all five of the girls became saintly nuns.

I will attach some historical images which may serve as a good guide, for determining how to be properly feminine and modest at the same time, in case anyone finds this difficult to do. While I know the exact style of the different eras are not necessarily what we should strive for, the images provide ideas for what is considered proper, yet lovely. 

I understand it is challenging, if not nearly impossible, to find the perfectly made dress that is attractive and adheres to Catholic standards. We must be creative! There are ways to utilize different items of clothing even from thrift stores, and combine them to create a fashionable, yet truly Catholic outfit. 






Re: Clothed
« Reply #4 on: Yesterday at 05:39:53 PM »
I have never read it (besides this preview) but wholeheartedly support the concept of combining modesty and beauty. God created women in particular to be beautiful, and being modest and tasteful at the same time, inspires observers with an attraction to virtue. God is Beauty, and His creation ought to be a reflection of His divine perfections.

Women also tend to act more like ladies when dressed prettily and modestly. Fr. Lasance remarks that women are sweet by nature, and lose that sweetness through tarnishing their purity, and it seems to me that being pretty yet modest helps to preserve this sweetness, just as one would regard with greater care a beautiful diamond, than a piece of steel.

I am not sure where this untucked shirt, bulky skirt look originated. It is unattractive and boyish.

It is helpful to look at how Our Lady appeared in her various apparitions. One can tell that she is a woman, and her waist is always defined with some kind of an accessory, while the rest of the dress flows effortlessly around. This is a style of dress that is both modest and feminine, and that almost any body type can wear with ease.

Observing the way St. Thérèse of Lisieux and her sisters dressed is helpful as well. Their gentle-hearted, noble father was quite strict regarding modesty. Purity was inculcated in them from an early age by both parents, and as we all know, all five of the girls became saintly nuns.

I will attach some historical images which may serve as a good guide, for determining how to be properly feminine and modest at the same time, in case anyone finds this difficult to do. While I know the exact style of the different eras are not necessarily what we should strive for, the images provide ideas for what is considered proper, yet lovely.

I understand it is challenging, if not nearly impossible, to find the perfectly made dress that is attractive and adheres to Catholic standards. We must be creative! There are ways to utilize different items of clothing even from thrift stores, and combine them to create a fashionable, yet truly Catholic outfit.



Some modern examples