Author Topic: Christianity in the Crosshairs (Read 799 times)

The Cub · « **on:** December 02, 2007, 12:22:17 AM »

.

Christianity in the Crosshairs

This writing discusses the fact that evil men of the masonic nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr have a pre-meditated and orchestrated plan to destroy the Church. While the attack will come from various directions, this writing discusses how evil men continue to pass laws making it a crime to preach certain Catholic doctrine regarding ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. At the time of this writing, such a law exists, in Sweden, France, Canada and the UK. Now bills are before the US Congress to establish a similar law in the USA.

Also, this writing contains 2 videos of US Judge Andrew Napolitano discussing the heinous unconstitutional US Patriot Act, which Americans Christians can expect to be used against them soon.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/era-of-peace/message/375

.

Vandaler · « **Reply #1 on:** December 02, 2007, 06:52:49 AM »

Hi The Cub,

I'm not inclined to research it all for other Countries, but you are wrong about Canada. The law allows and in fact protect the religious freedom to preach certain Catholic doctrine regarding ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity.

So, go nuts all you want about other Countries but don't touch mine.

Criminal Code of Canada: Hate Provisions - Summary

Quote

Section 319(3) identifies acceptable defences. Indicates that no person shall be convicted of an offence if the statements in question:

* are established to be true
* were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds it was believed to be true
* were expressed in good faith, it was attempted to establish by argument and opinion on a religious subject
* were expressed in good faith, it was intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in Canada

The Cub · « **Reply #2 on:** December 02, 2007, 01:50:39 PM »

.

'Bible as hate speech' signed into law
Canadian measure said to 'chill' opposition to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ behavior

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38268

Vandaler · « **Reply #3 on:** December 02, 2007, 02:18:23 PM »

Ya, I knew someone would bring back that Saskatchewan court case. I'll write a proper response when I get back from my engagement.

In the meanwhile, since you expressed concern for the profession of Catholic doctrine regarding ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, do you suggest this includes raising signs that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs need to be put to death - without any context or discernment - a part of what needs protected ? Is this Catholic Doctrine ? Of course not.

Vandaler · « **Reply #4 on:** December 02, 2007, 06:54:00 PM »

Hi,

Well, I'm not sure I have much more to add. This almost 5 year old story could have been presented as an example that could very well be starting point of a slippery slope.

However, that argument looses it's sense after a while where it is not really followed with other cases of real impact. There is no real problem. There is little sense in pretending there is. Religious liberties are alive and well.

As for this specific case, I personally support the judgment, and would have personally have added a smack outside the head of those behind the add for having misrepresented my faith.

Mousey · « **Reply #5 on:** December 23, 2007, 06:56:36 PM »

+

Catholic Activiist "Banned for life" From Publicly Criticizing (One of the 4 Sins cying out to Heaven for Veneance)

REGINA, Saskatchewan, December 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Saskatchewan Human Rights Commision's decision to impose a "lifetime" ban on a local Catholic' sfreedom to publicly cricize ( a certain politically correct perversion popular in Northern California), was upheld this week in its entirety by Saskatchewan Court of Queens Bench.
Bill Whatcott, a licensed practical nurse who lives in Saskatchewan, is a campaigner against the (perverted) political movement that is sweeping the Canadian legal system. In 2006, the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission (SHRC) ordered Whatcott to pay $17,500 Cn. to four complainants who complained that their "feelings" and "self-respect" were "injured" by Whatcottt's pamphlets denouncing (their "lifestyle" as immoral and dangerous.
Whatcott responded to the decision, "this fine is for telling the truth pthat these poor people] can change their behavior and be set free from their sin and depravity through the forgiveness of sins and shed blood of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ."

http://www.lifestyle.net/ldn/2007/dec/07121306.html

*(cf: Gen 19:24 ff; 2 Peter 3:12)

Nationalism is NOT a virtue and is not the same thing as patriotism. Patriotism is a virtue, when it can be applied, as it is first ordered to God as it is love of country, (but only) in so far as that country upholds and protects the natural moral law. These examples that have been given are NOT examples of upholding God's laws, rather, they are going against His laws and threatening to continue to go against them.

What Whatcott said was what the Church does infact teach, that there are punishments for breaking God's laws, and he had a moral right to specify those laws for instructing those who we might assume out of charity are ignorant of the His laws and the consequences of breaking them. If someone has an issue with that, there issue is with God's laws, not the Church.