Give me a break.

Agreed.  The whole chemtrails hoax has been debunked numerous times.  Those who still believe it will continue to believe it, regardless of whatever evidence comes to light.  It is too important to their pantheon of conspiracy and disinformation to be allowed to die.

Give me a break.

If you want a break go to McDonald's.

There is a real need for some Trad Catholics to shy away from truth. Anyone whose been on this board for a couple of years and is familiar with my posts knows that I am not one to shy away from 'conspiracy'. However, the Chemtrail argument is one the most daft ideas out there. I think Matthew, in trying to defend it against me before, said  something to the effect of: 'I know its true- I've seen them!" Quite the argument.

Rational explanations have been put forth before, and if people are interested they will seek them out; however, most who already believe that they are some means of control are unwilling, it seems, to be intellectually honest with themselves. They've bought in emotionally to this idea, and nothing will convince them otherwise.

Bologna. I cannot stand Ellen Degenerate, and fat Al Gore, but listen to this admission, of "sulfur dioxide," "droughts" "superstorm sandy."

OH BUT THE POLLUTION IS A HOAX, HMMMMMMM?



C'mon people.

AlGore and Ellen agree:  One Meatless Day A Week can save the planet!

So, Paul McCartney started this "meatless Mondays" and therefore, that's the answer!  

Isn't that great!  

Wait  ---  we had meatless Fridays for thousands of years but under some
ambiguity of equivocation it was largely discontinued with the unclean
spirit of Vat.II, and then -- pollution!!  So the answer is obviously meatless
Mondays!  It must be that the Church just had the wrong day.  It should
have been Monday all this time and then we wouldn't have pollution.

See how that works?  

I'd imagine Bishop Williamson feels the same way.

I couldn't care less if Bishop Williamson does feel that way.  His training is in the theology of the Church, not in atmospheric chemistry.

Yet his opinion carries more weight than yours and mine, given that he is a Bishop and has much more experience and intelligence.

To infer that his possession of Holy Orders affords him a particular authority, insight or weight into matters of science, of which he very probably only has a passing understanding, is gross idolatry.

Quote from: JohnGrey

Quote from: ServusSpiritusSancti

Yet his opinion carries more weight than yours and mine, given that he is a Bishop and has much more experience and intelligence.

To infer that his possession of Holy Orders affords him a particular authority, insight or weight into matters of which he very probably only has a passing understanding is gross idolatry.

That's not quite what I said.

Hogwash, that's precisely what you said.  It's blatantly in trail.  If you had simply limited your response to say that he had more experience and intelligence that I do, you could argue that point.  Naturally, I would demand to know what training he'd had, and how that training would add or remove to the weight of his opinion.  It was you, not I, that included his position as a Bishop as a means for knowing better whether chemtrails were or were not real.