They can't legally mandate it.
They word the headlines to make people think they can (President Biden is "considering" making it mandatory...they are planning to...they might...) but it's not legal because it is not FDA approved.
So people just comply under false pretenses.
Just like the fake Governors' "mandates" which aren't in any way a legal imposition on the citizens of their state since they are not emperors and don't have that jurisdiction. They don't make laws.
A free country requires an educated populace and the guts to take a stand against tyranny.
People in the US aren't taking the time to educate themselves with the facts about the actual law and even if they learn the facts they aren't taking a stand against the real lawbreakers (shops, schools, employers, churches). :/
Most people who are aware just share "shocking" videos like the one Marshall Taylor posted of the pregnant mom getting thrown out of her parish. This only causes more learned helplessness.
He has a very large following and since it's been a year now he should have used his "microphone" to educate his followers about how the laws is on their side so they can stand up to this tyranny.
Instead he promoted the wringing of hands and shaking of heads as the sheeple continue to bow to lawbreakers. Shame on him. ::sigh::
Anyway, more on the law here...see the bolded area about employers (that would go for schools too)
trying to mandate it...
Keep in mind moving forward there is also the American's with disabilities act and most people have a contraindication they can claim to avoid taking it as well as religious exemptions (although Conneticut just did away with that).
From Pamela Popper's email letter. Sign up at makeamericansfreeagian.comI have good and bad news about the potential for employer mandates for COVID vaccines. First, the bad news. Some healthcare institutions are requiring a COVID vaccine. Many, if not most of them have required flu vaccines in previous years. At this time, according to the CDC, 24 states require that healthcare workers in long-term care facilities receive a flu vaccine,[2] and 32 states required that patients in these facilities get a flu vaccine. While some employees have managed to get exemptions approved in the past, this may be much more difficult due to the hysteria generated by the declaration of the fake pandemic emergency.There is better news – at least for now – for non-healthcare workers. The two vaccines currently available in the U.S. were approved under Emergency Use Authorization and are considered investigational. They are not fully licensed. Both states and private businesses cannot mandate that anyone receive a product that is not fully licensed by the FDA.According to 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3 - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, people must be informed of the following: (I) that the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.[3]According to the FDA, federal law prevails:"FDA believes that the terms and conditions of an EUA issued under section 564 preempt state or local law, both legislative requirements and common-law duties, that impose different or additional requirements on the medical product for which the EUA was issued in the context of the emergency declared under section 564 … In an emergency, it is critical that the conditions that are part of the EUA or an order or waiver issued pursuant to section 564A — those that FDA has determined to be necessary or appropriate to protect the public health—be strictly followed, and that no additional conditions be imposed."[4]The executive secretary of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), a committee of the Centers for Disease Control, confirmed this during a meeting in August 2020:"I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated."[5]This does not mean that some employers won’t try to mandate COVID vaccines for their employees. But they will face several problems. An interesting legal precedent is Doe#1 v Rumsfeld, in which the court ruled that a vaccine approved under an EUA could not be mandated even for military personnel.[6]
Employee backlash and the potential for losing qualified long-term employees who may be difficult to replace may be an issue. Some employees might sue and file for temporary injunction, which could result in lengthy and expensive litigation.Liability is another issue. We’ve been advising employers for years about the potential liability associated with offering incentives to employees such as discounts on health insurance co-pays in return for agreeing to medical intervention. For example, a woman agrees to have a mammogram in order to save $50 per month on her co -pay for employer-sponsored insurance. She is diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ as a result of the mammogram. DCIS is not cancer; but her uninformed doctor advises her to have surgery and radiation. If she later finds out that she was over-diagnosed and overtreated, she might sue her employer for coercing her to have a mammogram. A firm mandate – for example a COVID-19 vaccine - as a condition of employment may increase the potential liability even more. It is almost inevitable that trial lawyers will be willing and ready to take these cases and sue for damages if employees are injured by COVID-19 vaccines. Employers can lose even if they ultimately win due to the cost of litigation, and presentation of the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) data concerning COVID vaccines to an employer considering mandates may be all that is required to change his/her mind.Last but not least, more and more lawsuits alleging that there was and is no pandemic/emergency are being filed. Some of these cases have already succeeded in other countries (detailed analysis of these cases will be provided in a future newsletter). If there is no pandemic and there is no emergency, then there is no justification for an emergency use authorization, and the government would have to rescind the EUAs. Then the COVID-19 vaccines would be subjected to more normal licensing procedures. It is almost certain that the vaccines would be approved – almost 96% of submissions to FDA from drug companies are approved. But without the constant false COVID hysteria, it would be difficult to force thinking people to get these vaccines.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5JSmSubwEw&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR2ZykO8JaXAbKrOq5Ui7Tje0p1kvwK5MzIkjiAGo1rPSLVH_EqkQ7T3FWY
[2]https://www.cdc.gov/phlp/publications/topic/menus/ltcinfluenza/index.html
[3] https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3
[4] https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-docuмents/emergency-use-authorization-medical-products-and-related-authorities
[5] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/videos/low-res/acipaug2020/COVID-19Supply-NextSteps_3_LowRes.mp4
[6] https://www.clearinghouse.net/detail.php?id=11861
Topic: “Catholic Colleges mandating the jab (Read 1704 times)