Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Can somebody refute this?  (Read 578 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pelly

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 637
  • Reputation: +118/-1
  • Gender: Male
Can somebody refute this?
« on: February 08, 2013, 11:51:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Somebody needs to refute this, especially the claims about JPII (he is an antipope in a Trad sense).


    Offline Pelly

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 637
    • Reputation: +118/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Can somebody refute this?
    « Reply #1 on: February 08, 2013, 12:14:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • EDIT: it seems like that the author used some Italianism.


    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Can somebody refute this?
    « Reply #2 on: February 08, 2013, 01:14:55 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This whole website appears to be nothing more than an anti-Catholic Protestant rag.  Most of the "facts" presented about the Church are fabrications invented to show the so-called errors of Catholicism.  Reading this is not unlike hearing about the hysterical rumours of "what really happens in cloistered convents" and all the things that Protestants accused Catholics of in American history.

    On the other hand, many (not all) of the claims about John Paul 2 and other Conciliar officials can't be refuted because they're true.  That's the problem with these bishops and cardinals; their heresies and apostasies give anti-Catholics ammunition to use against the Catholic Church because they, unlike the Protestant hersiarchs, continue to claim that they are Catholic while they work to destroy the Church.

    Offline Nishant

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2126
    • Reputation: +0/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Can somebody refute this?
    « Reply #3 on: February 08, 2013, 01:32:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When the Redeemer of the human race was called Beelzebul, He said what had happened to Him the head must happen also to the body. Therefore, the true Church must necessarily be reproached in a similar manner, and so the very fact that the Catholic Church is called AntiChrist by the heretics is only proof that she suffers similar calumnies as did her Lord and divine Founder because she is His true Church.

    By declaring Simon Peter the Rock on which He would build His Church, giving him the Keys to the Kingdom to bind on earth what would be bound in heaven, promising him that his faith would not fail, and after the Resurrection giving him the supreme pastoral charge to confirm his brethren in the faith, Our Lord Jesus Christ plainly and manifestly in Holy Writ instituted the Papacy as the visible foundation and principle of unity in the Church. The website's nonsense is a Protestant fiction intended to attempt to circuмvent the inconvenient fact that for 15 Christian centuries after Our Lord walked this earth no one knew anything of Protestant novelties and heresies.
    "Never will anyone who says his Rosary every day become a formal heretic ... This is a statement I would sign in my blood." St. Montfort, Secret of the Rosary. I support the FSSP, the SSPX and other priests who work for the restoration of doctrinal orthodoxy and liturgical orthopraxis in the Church. I accept Vatican II if interpreted in the light of Tradition and canonisations as an infallible declaration that a person is in Heaven. Sedevacantism is schismatic and Ecclesiavacantism is heretical.

    Offline Pelly

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 637
    • Reputation: +118/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Can somebody refute this?
    « Reply #4 on: February 08, 2013, 03:27:07 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • They are actually Sabbatarians. Also, I figured out the error.