[Sent earlier to Carhartt, per the email address in the video in the OP:]


Dear Mr. Valade-

My initial instinct was to impress upon you the futility and frivolity of vaccine mandates, in light of the growing scientific evidence concluding that they neither protect from infection, nor do they stop transmission (see Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla's recent admission to yahoo Finance that "the first two shots provided very little, if any, protection.").  No doubt, we'll hear from him again about the ineffectiveness of the 3rd shot, once the 4th is ready for market.

When this information is combined with the over 1 million adverse side effects reported by the CDC to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System), I think we can both admit these experimental gene serums are neither safe nor effective, as initially promoted.

Losing ground on those refuted claims, the latest myth is that the experimental gene serums will reduce the severity of symptoms, should the jabbed become infected (as they surely will).  That claim is contradicted by recent studies and statistics in Great Britain, Denmark, Israel, Iceland, and the United States, showing that the overwhelming majority of ICU patients are double jabbed and/or boosted.  The same studies indicate that the jabbed are 2-6x more likely to be infected by "vaccination," and 27x more likely to be symptomatic! 

So much for "lessening the symptoms."

Since I refuse to believe you lack the intelligence and critical thinking abilities to grasp these refutations, I can only conclude that you have no interest in the science.  Evidently, you have political, social, economic, or ideological reasons for doing what you are doing, and that being the case, I will not bore you with additional details regarding the immoral testing these experimental gene serums haveundergone, being derived from the human embryonic kidney cells of aborted babies, nor will I bother to note the Nuremberg human rights violations your mandate implicitly supports regarding human medical experimentation.

All I can really do is boycott Carhartt products, and do what I can to persuade others to boycott your products as well, until such time as you might reconsider.

Semper Idem,

Sean Johnson
1/18/22

As a long-haired country boy, I never bought or wore Carhartt clothing. Something about the brand was a turn off. Too many people wore the clothes as a fashion or status symbol, not for which it was originally designed or intended to be used. It's sorta like the people who drive Wrangers. 99% of them are poser "outdoorsman". When a company like Carhartt almost monopolizes the market, you know they're coopted in some way. Doesn't surprise me that they want to biologically rape their employees with a depopulation needle. I've had good use out of Dickies, Wrangler and Rustler clothing in terms of durability and function for much less cost than Carhartt, too.