Back in the day, like back in 1984, I started wondering, 'wow. every single day they have a meeting...?'  And I think they're still supposed to be going on but can't be bothered to check.  At Lourdes, the 'experts' tried all kinds of things on the ecstatic Bernadette.  One should show the 'finger poke' on one of the Medja-booboo visionaries to Strickland. 

Just say No to Medja boo boo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPDRbO_qJ7g&pp=ygUQbWVkanVnb3JqZSBmcmF1ZA%3D%3D

Yeah, pretty amazing.  They had to come up with something and maybe some people even believed that.  That sure was/is a whopper.

Well, he means well, to show devotion to Our Lady ... but is deceived about Medjugorje.  IMO, this one is not diabolical but just an outright fraud, as there have been no demonstrable preternatural phenomena associated with it.

I'm sorry Lad, but by the time a man becomes a Bishop, meaning well doesn't cut it. Where is the discernment? Most people know Medjugorje has been a scam for over 30 years. It just supports the premise to me that these NO Episcopal Consecrations can't confer the grace needed for the office. Strickland was also involved with Voris planning a Catholic community by Tyler ,Texas. Who of any consequence didn't know that Voris and Ferndale were homo- crazytown for a very long time?

I'm sorry Lad, but by the time a man becomes a Bishop, meaning well doesn't cut it. Where is the discernment? Most people know Medjugorje has been a scam for over 30 years. It just supports the premise to me that these NO Episcopal Consecrations can't confer the grace needed for the office. Strickland was also involved with Voris planning a Catholic community by Tyler ,Texas. Who of any consequence didn't know that Voris and Ferndale were homo- crazytown for a very long time?

Doesn't cut it for what, having good intentions (which is all I attributed to him)?  Then I said he was deceived.  I know some people who believed they were showing devotion to Our Lady by going to Medjugorje.  So is Strickland going there to show his allegiance to Satan?  Ridiculous.

As for for this being support for the invalidity of NO Rite of Episcopal consecration, that's utter nonsense.  Archbishop Thuc was a validly consecrated bishop and bought into the alleged apparitions at Palmar, Bishop Williamson validly consecrated and bought into Garabandal (there's plenty of evidence for that being diabolical), etc.  There's absolutely no relationship between valid Holy Orders and prudence, good judgment, or even moral rectitude (as we've had a fair number of valid bishops who became heretics, schismatics, or even moral perverts).  And lots of well-meaning Catholics thought that Voris was OK ... including some Traditional Catholics here who were defending him against some of my criticisms.

Doesn't cut it for what, having good intentions (which is all I attributed to him)?  Then I said he was deceived.  I know some people who believed they were showing devotion to Our Lady by going to Medjugorje.  So is Strickland going there to show his allegiance to Satan?  Ridiculous.

As for for this being support for the invalidity of NO Rite of Episcopal consecration, that's utter nonsense.  Archbishop Thuc was a validly consecrated bishop and bought into the alleged apparitions at Palmar, Bishop Williamson validly consecrated and bought into Garabandal (there's plenty of evidence for that being diabolical), etc.  There's absolutely no relationship between valid Holy Orders and prudence, good judgment, or even moral rectitude (as we've had a fair number of valid bishops who became heretics, schismatics, or even moral perverts).  And lots of well-meaning Catholics thought that Voris was OK ... including some Traditional Catholics here who were defending him against some of my criticisms.

Ok- I see your point. But I still question the lack of discernment. Some of these red flags are so obvious a 10 year old could navigate them. I can't understand the naiveté of this ( and probably many other ) NO Bishops. 

I think he recently is trying Latin Mass I thought he said. 

Ok- I see your point. But I still question the lack of discernment. Some of these red flags are so obvious a 10 year old could navigate them. I can't understand the naiveté of this ( and probably many other ) NO Bishops.

Strickland's currently a focal point for USA novusordites who are starting to notice coincidences, question the narrative, and start to think seriously about walking away from the blasphemous farce that is the conciliar church. It follows that anything that undermines Strickland's discernment also undermines all these other lay people. In demonic terms, he's a high value target even if, especially if, he's NO.