Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI  (Read 6262 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Last Tradhican

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6293
  • Reputation: +3330/-1939
  • Gender: Male
Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
« on: March 29, 2022, 08:11:28 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!3
  • Quote
    We really need a sub-forum to put all the marijuana threads in one location.

    Those that don't want to see these threads can make sure they place the sub-forum on ignore.


    Someone suggested the above which is better than nothing, however, my advice is to ban all discussion on marijuana. The rare few here (I can count them on one hand) who want to smoke marijuana can go out into the world and find thousands of places and millions of people to talk about it. They are not needed here. One day they will regret everything they wrote, but for now, let them write it elsewhere. This is a Catholic forum we are all trying to improve ourselves spiritually, MJ use is a deceit of the world, it is a scandal and debasing for Catholics to be identified as MJ smokers. Trad Catholics for Marijuana use is an oxymoron.


    Quote
    Catholics promoting the smoking of marijuana for recreation brings to mind a quote from Our Lady to Sister Mary of Agreda "close thy senses to the deceits and fabulations of the world". There is nothing noble about recreational smoking of MJ, it is just another deceit of the world. Catholics, that is real Catholics, should aspire to ennoble their spirit. MJ is debasing, it is a scandal for Catholics to even say they smoke MJ for recreation, especially here on a public forum for all to read for years.


    Mystical City of God by Sister Mary of Agreda Volume 3 page 67 & 68:

    73. Come then, my daughter, come and follow me. And in order that thou mayest imitate me as I desire and that thy understanding may be properly enlightened, thy spirit sufficiently ennobled and prepared, and thy will inflamed, separate thyself from all earthly things as thy Spouse wishes; withdraw thyself from what is visible, forsake all the creatures, deny thyself, close thy senses to the deceits and fabulations of the world (Ps. 39, 5).







    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #1 on: March 29, 2022, 08:19:43 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • I agree, but not for the same reasons as you.

    It's gotten out of hand.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]


    Offline Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18438
    • Reputation: +5734/-1975
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #2 on: March 29, 2022, 09:33:06 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!2
  • Delete all these marijuana threads.  ( before someone’s employer reads them some how.). 

    And delete my stupid thread about people acting like animals. 
    May God bless you and keep you

    Online Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12488
    • Reputation: +7936/-2451
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #3 on: March 29, 2022, 10:36:09 PM »
  • Thanks!6
  • No Thanks!3
  • LT is truly obsessed. 

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32965
    • Reputation: +29272/-598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #4 on: March 30, 2022, 06:21:22 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
  • I have spoken.

    https://www.cathinfo.com/computers-and-technology/announcement-marijuana-threads/

    Short version: If you don't like them, then for crying out loud IGNORE THEM and don't reply. I correct myself: STOP replying. Everyone complaining about these threads has been doing a LOUSY job of ignoring them, from what I can tell. Replying to a thread BUMPS it, bringing it back to the top! It keeps the thread alive, invites even more replies, etc.

    And for heaven's sake don't argue with the creator of a thread you don't like! That just gives them a series of free thread BUMPS!

    What do we teach our kids? Sometimes you have to be a big person and IGNORE them. Giving them attention is self-defeating for your cause.

    There are few people who can argue with themselves for days or weeks on end -- they have to have someone to fight with. And again, if I saw someone bumping their own thread with fluff/nonsense just to keep it at the top, and no one was taking the bait, I might consider that spamming and deal with that member individually (yes, I'm talking about banning).
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Online Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 46945
    • Reputation: +27801/-5167
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #5 on: March 30, 2022, 07:28:13 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1

  • Someone suggested the above which is better than nothing, however, my advice is to ban all discussion on marijuana.

    Last Trad, you (and one other poster) prolonged the one thread out there about it and then spun off several more.  But now that you can't actually make rational refutation of the principles enunciated by an approved and well-respected pre-Vatican II moral theology, you want them banned?

    You cited my suggestions they be put in a sub-forum ... which I said only because there have been (going on) a dozen threads on the same subject.

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #6 on: March 30, 2022, 08:24:57 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • MATTHEW HAS SPOKEN
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 32965
    • Reputation: +29272/-598
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #7 on: March 30, 2022, 08:35:10 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I added another line:

    There are few people who can argue with themselves for days or weeks on end -- they have to have someone to fight with. And again, if I saw someone bumping their own thread with fluff/nonsense just to keep it at the top, and no one was taking the bait, I might consider that spamming and deal with that member individually (yes, I'm talking about banning).

    But the people complaining the most are major participants in the threads in question, as far as I can tell! I'm sorry, but actions speak louder than words. If you participate actively in a thread, then YOU LIKE IT, period. Some people "enjoy" controversy, fighting, debate, and adversarial discussion.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    My accounts (Paypal, Venmo) have been (((shut down))) PM me for how to donate and keep the forum going.


    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5847
    • Reputation: +4694/-490
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #8 on: March 30, 2022, 09:54:38 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Just thought I'd add some helpful advice:  Members are not required to read every single post or even every single topic on the forum.

    If one doesn't want to read a marijuana topics...or BOD, geo-centrism, or any other particular category of topic...one can simply not open them and read.  I guess this is lost on some members.

    I even unsubscribe from topics on which I've participated when the conversation veers or becomes tiresome.

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #9 on: March 30, 2022, 09:56:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There's also an ignore feature. You can ignore people that are really upsetting you. It's not a bad idea to use it.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]

    Offline epiphany

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3535
    • Reputation: +1097/-875
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #10 on: March 30, 2022, 12:32:29 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!5
  • There's also an ignore feature. You can ignore people that are really prideful, demeaning, presumptuous, cause detraction, and who is proof that evolution CAN go in reverse. upsetting you. It's not a bad idea to use it.
    There, fixed it.


    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #11 on: March 30, 2022, 02:12:20 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • now that you can't actually make rational refutation of the principles enunciated by an approved and well-respected pre-Vatican II moral theology, you want them banned?
    The writer lives in his own world, thinks his interpretation, his opinion on Jone is dogma. Unfortunately for him he is a nobody so no one will listen to him unless he posts a detailed article by a priest. I posted the SSPX article which is approved by the SSPX which has over 600 priest teaching it. The writer above comes back with the same line like a parrot repeating himself over and over. 

    Not a one defenders of recreational use of marijuana has brought forward one article from a trad priest or a priestly organization.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3330/-1939
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #12 on: March 30, 2022, 02:19:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • I have spoken.

    https://www.cathinfo.com/computers-and-technology/announcement-marijuana-threads/

    Short version: If you don't like them, then for crying out loud IGNORE THEM and don't reply. I correct myself: STOP replying. Everyone complaining about these threads has been doing a LOUSY job of ignoring them, from what I can tell. Replying to a thread BUMPS it, bringing it back to the top! It keeps the thread alive, invites even more replies, etc.

    And for heaven's sake don't argue with the creator of a thread you don't like! That just gives them a series of free thread BUMPS!

    What do we teach our kids? Sometimes you have to be a big person and IGNORE them. Giving them attention is self-defeating for your cause.

    There are few people who can argue with themselves for days or weeks on end -- they have to have someone to fight with. And again, if I saw someone bumping their own thread with fluff/nonsense just to keep it at the top, and no one was taking the bait, I might consider that spamming and deal with that member individually (yes, I'm talking about banning).
    What I wrote has nothing to do with "ignoring them if you do not like them". I was very precise and clear, in short "This is a Catholic forum, we are all trying to improve ourselves spiritually, MJ use is a deceit of the world, it is a scandal and debasing for Catholics to be identified as MJ smokers". If you want CI to be identified as a trad forum of dope smokers, which is a scandal to trads and potential converts looking in on CI, then that's your choice.


    Quote
    Someone suggested the above which is better than nothing, however, my advice is to ban all discussion on marijuana. The rare few here (I can count them on one hand) who want to smoke marijuana can go out into the world and find thousands of places and millions of people to talk about it. They are not needed here. One day they will regret everything they wrote, but for now, let them write it elsewhere. This is a Catholic forum we are all trying to improve ourselves spiritually, MJ use is a deceit of the world, it is a scandal and debasing for Catholics to be identified as MJ smokers. Trad Catholics for Marijuana use is an oxymoron.



    Offline 2Vermont

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 11528
    • Reputation: +6477/-1195
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #13 on: March 30, 2022, 03:22:58 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • I have spoken.

    https://www.cathinfo.com/computers-and-technology/announcement-marijuana-threads/

    Short version: If you don't like them, then for crying out loud IGNORE THEM and don't reply. I correct myself: STOP replying. Everyone complaining about these threads has been doing a LOUSY job of ignoring them, from what I can tell. Replying to a thread BUMPS it, bringing it back to the top! It keeps the thread alive, invites even more replies, etc.

    And for heaven's sake don't argue with the creator of a thread you don't like! That just gives them a series of free thread BUMPS!

    What do we teach our kids? Sometimes you have to be a big person and IGNORE them. Giving them attention is self-defeating for your cause.

    There are few people who can argue with themselves for days or weeks on end -- they have to have someone to fight with. And again, if I saw someone bumping their own thread with fluff/nonsense just to keep it at the top, and no one was taking the bait, I might consider that spamming and deal with that member individually (yes, I'm talking about banning).
    Matthew is there a way to remove them from the Recent Topics list? 

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4718/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Ban Marijuana Discussions from CI
    « Reply #14 on: March 30, 2022, 03:34:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • There, fixed it.
    No, what I said was sufficient.
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]