What is this a sedevacantist echo chamber?

Have any of you actually gone to an FSSP parish more than a few times? I doubt it.

All their priests are ordained in the traditional rite, so what are you going on about?

1. WHO ordained the alleged priest, FSSP or otherwise? (btw, the FSSP were instrumental in my adoption of the Sede position. The might actually edify a bit if you try to de-ass a mite hoss)

You may wish to rephrase the question ma'am. Acronyms, validity, and politics aside, providing you don't violate other Church precepts or principle.
1. Is there a CATHOLIC priest/bp to ask? (There is too much 'sifting' as is. If there is a question for a confessor, SD etc., and there's one there, no matter how otherwise to your "taste", then 'suck it up'. Don't be like the indulters who snub and snob the "mass" of their "church")
2. Where is your man trad(?). The man IS the head, like it or not.
3. Otherwise, "Suffer the little children…if any cause one of these little ones to stumble…" In light of1+2, anybody than doesn't like it can beef withJesus.

out.

Thanks to everyone for replying, but I started this thread to discuss bringing young children to Mass, not the FSSP.

Politics etc. aside (presuming valid/licit whatever)
1. People we can't NORMALLY perceive are there,  esp. Christ.
2. The angels of children are very proximate to God "24/7"
3. Anyone who has any sense knows that just because one isn't of age or reason doesn't mean they've naught to say. Kids tend to chat up anyone. I'm thinking God beats "Stinky Pete" the warranty wino that scares nightmares. God is far more apppealing to those not headed for Hell. Maybe the brat wants a chat or a romp.

yeh, i was thinking the same thing. I hate "disturbing" people in any way but I have been accused of "disturbing" people just by  walking, say to the restroom or outside the sanctuary for some reason. I think it is very rude and un=Christian to treat people like that. I had to explain to a priest once that, you know, people DO have issues/concerns/needs that must be taken care of wehther they are at Mass or not. If you drank a lot of water before going to Mass, obviously you may have to go to the restroom during Mass, thereby "disturbing" people. Some people just have malice in their heart and/or want to feel morally superior to others so they claim to be disturbed. If a crying baby causes you to stop focusing on Jesus, maybe you don't have such a good thing w/ Jesus? Do ya think?

??

that is MY perspective

The church has long taught men were to respect their wives until the child was weaned, roughly 2 years.
and this was still common in the fifties and sixties.  

I'm glad my ancestors didn't follow your logic because most likely I wouldn't be here today. The average number of children before WWII, from my father's german side of things, was usually 12 or more. My grandfather was the eldest of 16, he had 9 sisters which all went and died in the convent. 

Thank Goodness my father was from before the craze of the "Babyboom" era and maintained some sanity to combat the obsurd mentalities of the 50's and 60's. It's probably the only reason that I was able to have a full life living with the Traditional Mass and Faith and never had to step foot inside a NO church.

So you want to use the number of children that the parents of saints had? How and why then could the great St Catherine of Siena been the youngest of 25, and her mother was only 40 when she was born!  Do the math...

I understand you disagree with my post but please read it and quote correctly

1.  It wasn't my logic, it was the way parents were taught and advised by priests.
Read The Marriage Manual by Kelly.

2.  I didn't " use the number of children that the parents of saints had "
I used the saints themselves and there were many more.

If you do some investigating you'll find medically sound practices adapted from before the
time of Christ practiced by the Jєωs, carried over into Christianity, for example the 40 days abstinence after
childbirth.

It is very distracting to have a baby and especially multiple babies in Mass crying and being taken in and out, in and out. They really don't belong in there.

Just think about it this way: they would never be allowed to do this in a nice Opera or a similar venue. How much more so for attending the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? This is a modern thing and it is literally turning Masses into cry rooms in some cases.

The priest should really say something.

So what do you propose as a solution? Our priests and bishops are not telling women with children under the age of 3 to stay home, so... women go to mass to fulfill their obligation, with an infant, because they love God and don't want to offend Him by committing a mortal sin.
Unless the Church says women with infants and toddlers should stay home then priests need to make an effort come up with a way for women to participate in mass the best they can without disturbing others.
How do you propose they do that in small chapels that have no cry room? Most priests have no choice but to let them in because there is nowhere else for them to go.

It is very distracting to have a baby and especially multiple babies in Mass crying and being taken in and out, in and out. They really don't belong in there.

Just think about it this way: they would never be allowed to do this in a nice Opera or a similar venue. How much more so for attending the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass? This is a modern thing and it is literally turning Masses into cry rooms in some cases.

The priest should really say something.

Opera? You really think they're analogous? Please also substantiate assertion re: "… modern…"