Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Arthur Vermeersch, S.J. and Mithrandylan -- Any thoughts?  (Read 415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rum

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1554
  • Reputation: +736/-701
  • Gender: Male
Arthur Vermeersch, S.J. and Mithrandylan -- Any thoughts?
« on: July 27, 2025, 11:30:35 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!2
  • Arthur Vermeersch, S.J.

    Mithrandylan has this quote in his signature:

    Quote
    "Be kind; do not seek the malicious satisfaction of having discovered an additional enemy to the Church... And, above all, be scrupulously truthful. To all, friends and foes alike, give that serious attention which does not misrepresent any opinion, does not distort any statement, does not mutilate any quotation. We need not fear to serve the cause of Christ less efficiently by putting on His spirit". (Vermeersch, 1913).

    Any evidence that Fr. Vermeersche ever wrote against the Jws? I'm not impressed with the thoughtfulness of what I've read about Vermeersch. Though perhaps someone can tell me something about Fr. Vermeersche that will make me trust him.

    Thoughtfulness is Mr. Rogers, a creepy crypto-jw. Ken Burns, another jw. Mr. Rogers even talked in that baby-voice in real life. It wasn't a character. It was him. Sniper in Vietnam. What a jw weirdo.

    Hobbledehoy is a former member of this forum who posted nothing but scans of religious works. Many thought that this was evidence of his holiness. I didn't fall for that schtick. It didn't shock me when Hobbledehoy had some sort of breakdown.

    Mithrandylan reminds me of Hobbledehoy. Steering clear of any subject matter that would expose them. Sticking close to their camouflage of thoughtfulness.

    All ears if any of you can find me anything Fr. Vermeersch wrote against the jws.

    Some source material:

    https://wmreview.co.uk/2023/01/12/catholics-in-error/

    https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/vermeersch-arthur
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline St Giles

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 1506
    • Reputation: +795/-191
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Arthur Vermeersch, S.J. and Mithrandylan -- Any thoughts?
    « Reply #1 on: July 27, 2025, 12:53:05 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!1
  • Mithrandylan is a good guy. I've seen a glimpse of his work, and I hope there is much more like it. Is he perfect? Probably no more than the rest of us.

    Not every priest needs to make it their life's mission to preach against the jws. It is useful information people should be made aware of, but doesn't help much in the way of teaching souls to be holy. Satan is behind the jws, it is sufficient to preach against Satan.
    "Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect."
    "Seek first the kingdom of Heaven..."
    "Every idle word that men shall speak, they shall render an account for it in the day of judgment"


    Offline rum

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1554
    • Reputation: +736/-701
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Arthur Vermeersch, S.J. and Mithrandylan -- Any thoughts?
    « Reply #2 on: July 27, 2025, 10:15:56 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!4
  • No he's not a good guy. He's a snake in the grass. It's extremely easy to cultivate an air of high-mindedness on the internet, which he does, and which fools some.

    He was one of the moderators on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. He threw me under the bus on ABLF 1.0 when the entire forum ganged up on me for starting two threads about female hair length and sex-segregated forums. He could have come to my defense. He didn't. He had no problem with the judaizing outbreak. He later didn't defend me on TeDeum when I drew the ire of the judaized lunatic VoxPopulis. He's buddy-buddy with the claimed jwish convert 2vermont, who attacked me on TeDeum for being critical of jws. She has never apologized to me. She also never offers Catholics any information about jws, which is also true of jaynek. They never share with us anything of interest about jws, a subject that would be of deep interest to them were they genuine converts.

    He was completely smitten with Fisheaters until the tranny promotion, even though I had outed VoxClamantis a year or so earlier. Not that she even needed to be outed. That forum reeked of crypto-judaism the first time I encountered it. The outing was for the benefit of other people, not that it mattered.

    "Not every priest needs to make it their life's mission to preach against the jws."


    Duh. True. In fact I can't think of any priest who has made such a thing their life's mission. Still in reading about Vermeersch I haven't been able to find anything that is critical of jws. Perhaps someone else will find something.

    You're a lightweight. You should stick to the classical music thread.
    Some would have people believe that I'm a deceiver because I've used various handles on different Catholic forums. They only know this because I've always offered such information, unprompted. Various troll accounts on FE. Ben on SuscipeDomine. Patches on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. GuitarPlucker, Busillis, HatchC, and Rum on Cathinfo.

    Offline caxap

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 121
    • Reputation: +28/-100
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Arthur Vermeersch, S.J. and Mithrandylan -- Any thoughts?
    « Reply #3 on: Yesterday at 04:51:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!3
  • No he's not a good guy. He's a snake in the grass. It's extremely easy to cultivate an air of high-mindedness on the internet, which he does, and which fools some.

    He was one of the moderators on ABLF 1.0 and TeDeum. He threw me under the bus on ABLF 1.0 when the entire forum ganged up on me for starting two threads about female hair length and sex-segregated forums. He could have come to my defense. He didn't. He had no problem with the judaizing outbreak. He later didn't defend me on TeDeum when I drew the ire of the judaized lunatic VoxPopulis. He's buddy-buddy with the claimed jwish convert 2vermont, who attacked me on TeDeum for being critical of jws. She has never apologized to me. She also never offers Catholics any information about jws, which is also true of jaynek. They never share with us anything of interest about jws, a subject that would be of deep interest to them were they genuine converts.

    He was completely smitten with Fisheaters until the tranny promotion, even though I had outed VoxClamantis a year or so earlier. Not that she even needed to be outed. That forum reeked of crypto-judaism the first time I encountered it. The outing was for the benefit of other people, not that it mattered.

    "Not every priest needs to make it their life's mission to preach against the jws."


    Duh. True. In fact I can't think of any priest who has made such a thing their life's mission. Still in reading about Vermeersch I haven't been able to find anything that is critical of jws. Perhaps someone else will find something.

    You're a lightweight. You should stick to the classical music thread.

    Agreed.