Eastern Catholics are NOT part of the Latin Church.

You're the one who brought up the eastern catholics, in rebuttal to the pre-V2 comment. Obviously, eastern catholics weren't affected by V2, so why you brought them up, is irrelevant. I brought them up because "Holy Ghost" as you say, is typical of english-speaking countries, of which, even eastern-catholic countries speak, but due to their non-latin-church religious culture, don't use "Holy Ghost". As I said, they are the exception to the rule. The vast majority of the WESTERN
english-speaking catholics, use "Holy Ghost".
But do you understand that we have in English inherited "Holy Ghost" from essentially Reformation-inspired literary sources?
So what? The point being that "Holy Ghost" has been used AT LEAST 500+ years and is the "norm".
However, I know that "Holy Spirit" is of IDENTICAL meaning to "Holy Ghost".
It is and it isn't. There's a reason that "Holy Ghost" started being used, and this thread has many examples. Your view is missing the forest for the trees.
And this whole debate is a nonsensical argument
No it's not.
by poorly-educated, insular trads who love to play "tradier-than-thou". And the very humourous thing is that in North America, one encounters "Holy Ghost" in conversation and prayer mostly amongst fundamentalist (not evangelical or pentecostal) Protestants as well as Anglo-Catholic Episcopalians. And we trad Catholics.
Many, many, MANY church prayers (written in ENGLISH) use the phrase "Holy Ghost". If you think it doesn't matter, take it up with the Church.
Trads need to stop being intellectual emarrassments! In undermines are struggle for the Faith and against the Modernists.

500 years of using "Holy Ghost", and the Modernists get rid of it, and you're saying Trads are the embarrassment? ? ? What are you smoking, man?