Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Any Heliocentrists on CI?  (Read 7824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Any Heliocentrists on CI?
« Reply #130 on: December 13, 2021, 08:11:13 PM »

There are dozens of measures and experiments to disprove each of those points.

:popcorn:

I have yet to see any of these.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Any Heliocentrists on CI?
« Reply #131 on: December 13, 2021, 08:13:22 PM »
:laugh1: Explain how the setting sun, disappearing below the horizon, disappearing below the surface of Dubay's flat earth, doesn't ensure darkness all over the flat earth. Or shut up already.
:facepalm:

That has not only been explained but demonstrated in action (in a small model at least) by many Flat Earthers.  Besides that, you're attacking the Flat Earth from total ignorance based on this question.  According to the FE model, the sun does NOT disppear BELOW the horizon, nor BELOW the surface.  It stays above the surface the entire time.  So you're attacking strawmen and things you have no comprehension of.  And you continue to use ridicule and and the old "Dubay's flat earth" lie.  Your dishonest tactics ae getting pretty old.


Re: Any Heliocentrists on CI?
« Reply #132 on: December 13, 2021, 08:24:45 PM »
Wow, I guess Adam didn't know what shape the earth was (even though he personally named every animal and had the most perfect intellect ever created), but he had to wait for "modern science" to figure it out.  :facepalm:  The hubris is shocking!
What you're saying is not coherent, Adam wouldn't require to know the shape of the Earth to name the animals.

Aristoteles discovered the Earth to be round, as posted by Yeti here: https://www.cathinfo.com/catholic-living-in-the-modern-world/is-refusing-to-accept-an-'obvious-fact'-a-sin-of-lying/msg792250/#msg792250

Modern science :jester:

That's a strawman, please be honest.

Re: Any Heliocentrists on CI?
« Reply #133 on: December 13, 2021, 08:28:33 PM »
I have yet to see any of these.
To start with two simple ones, lunar eclipses and solar eclipses. I dare to say that the Israelites didn't really measure or analyze those when they happened. Because in the FE model you need an occluder, some kind of third unkown dark invisible body that invokes lunar and solar eclipses. Such a body yet has to be demonstrated to exist.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Any Heliocentrists on CI?
« Reply #134 on: December 13, 2021, 08:43:42 PM »
To start with two simple ones, lunar eclipses and solar eclipses. I dare to say that the Israelites didn't really measure or analyze those when they happened. Because in the FE model you need an occluder, some kind of third unkown dark invisible body that invokes lunar and solar eclipses. Such a body yet has to be demonstrated to exist.

That's because nobody's honestly looking for it in modern science.  And that's not necessarily the cause of eclipses  There's a fair bit of theory in Flat Earth due to the lack of resources to actually verify the theory.  Nevertheless, the standard mainstream theory about eclipses and the moon in general is falsified by many different observations.