.
I don't think there is any practical alternative. Who would enforce this strange rule?
Weirdos on the internet cannot harm anyone who observes the rules I suggested. That's why I said people need to figure out whom to avoid, and do so.
How is this strange? The state is basically one big family. We have become far too used to our individualistic society that we think we can just do what we want. But we can't. That's just not reality.
Is it morally right for a sick person to be parading in public as a normal person. That's my question. Not about enforcement. Just simply, is it right, or wrong.
The "no harm" thing really is a liberal position. All bad behavior causes harm. The question is how much does a Catholic family or state tolerate. But that's after if we have truly established whether something is right or wrong.
Which some people here seem to have great difficulty wanting to do.
Topic: Allow autists on the internet? (Read 19067 times)