Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7

Author Topic: Aging Feminist Careerists  (Read 3894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cantarella

Re: Aging Feminist Careerists
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2018, 03:25:55 PM »
Quote from: Matthew on June 12, 2018, 03:14:36 PM
Not necessarily. Women are naturally domestic and concerned with things inside the four walls of the home, including the larder and any supplies. Bookkeeping, while not exactly an emasculating occupation, is certainly in line with feminine nature. Hence the large number of bookkeepers and accountants that are female today. They are often quite good at it.

But my other point: there's a huge difference between:

Keeping the books, paying the bills, cutting checks (like a secretary)
and
Being the "responsible" one, being in charge/control of the finances, making the financial decisions

Let's face it -- many a sole proprietor (who OWNS his own company) farms out the bookkeeping/accounting to hired help, usually a woman, who sometimes doubles as a secretary. Does that mean he's giving up control of his company to some female secretary? Of course not. I assure you that any business owner is keeping the necessary -- and best -- part for himself. But a man can't do everything. He needs to focus on ongoing education, finding more customers/clients, new products, etc., plus doing all kinds of work for his customers/clients. He doesn't need to be a bookkeeper as well.

It also depends on the culture. In Japan, for instance, which used to be one of the most patriarchal societies, the housewives are traditionally the ones who do it.  
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Aging Feminist Careerists
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2018, 03:33:17 PM »
But yes, the traditional 1950's matriarchal nonsense, where the woman is IN CHARGE of the finances, dominates them, or is the closest thing to a responsible adult when it comes to the household finances -- yes, that's a problem.

Refer to all kinds of jokes on the subject, including the Jetson's intro. George Jetson fishes a few bills out of his wallet to give his wife for shopping, and she takes the wallet and leaves. As if George is too dumb, or doesn't have the right, to allocate the right amount to this specific shopping trip. Call me what you will, but I don't find gags like that funny AT ALL. That whole "you silly dummy" attitude towards men is quite sickening, and it's ALL OVER Hollywood. And not just for the past 20 years, but more like the past 80 years!

I don't know why the Goyim found (still find?) these kind of jokes funny, but the Jews keep beating on these same stale, old jokes like a rented mule. You almost can't find a cartoon or movie where the "stupid dad" trope isn't present.
Logged

Offline Cantarella

Re: Aging Feminist Careerists
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2018, 03:47:39 PM »
Quote from: jvk on June 12, 2018, 10:10:13 AM
Maybe I'm just speaking for myself, but I struggle constantly against the temptation to feel sorry for myself when I see many modern women running around with designer clothes, no sick or whiny children, no major cooking or laundry projects EVERY day, no grumpy husband, no commitments...just independence and money from a nice job.  I know that it's not what God designed a woman for.  But the package looks so nice!  I crave just 5 minutes to use the bathroom in peace.

I think this is just a public facade and the propaganda they want us to see as part of social re-engineering. This type of woman is actually broken inside. As they age, they start engaging in all kinds of silly eccentricities (having pets as children is one very common example today).

Many, many women have this staggering ability to live in a constant state of self-delusion, all their lives. They completely refuse to see reality for what it is.
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Aging Feminist Careerists
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2018, 03:56:33 PM »
Stupidity...you got that right.

I know of a career woman who wears things like: above the knee, tight, bright red skirts, sleeveless shirts, and high heels (without socks) -- all at the same time. And women like this expect to be taken seriously at work -- and even be paid the same as men, who are all-business, and are there ONLY TO WORK? Hahaha, don't make me laugh!

And this woman isn't "available" either -- on paper, at least, she would deny being on the hunt for a man. She has 2 kids, and some kind of man in her life (I don't know if he's the father of her 2 kids).

Meanwhile all the men in her office are business casual -- wearing attire like dressy shoes (with socks of course -- you don't see any toes or bare feet), at least short sleeves, long pants (you don't see any bare legs or knees). Why is there a double-standard for what women can wear in a business setting?

If I came to work with my knees showing, my entire upper arms showing, and sandals without socks, people would NOT take me seriously in the business world. But if a woman does the same thing, we're supposed to take her seriously and pay her 100% of what a man would make. Huh?

Call me whatever you want, but if I had two qualified candidates for a $100K position -- one of whom was there to work, and the other was there to work "and look pretty/show off her body to troll for men", I'd go with the one who's there to work!
Logged

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
Re: Aging Feminist Careerists
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2018, 04:02:33 PM »
The women who dress like men (in pantsuits, covering up everything that men do) are the only consistent ones in the feminist world. They are messed up trying to be men, but at least they have a leg to stand on when they cry, "We don't make as much as a man would in the same job description!"
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
« previous next »