Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: 1970s exorcism Pope Paul VITLM v NOEcone  (Read 731 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline andysloan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1219
  • Reputation: +8/-5
  • Gender: Male
1970s exorcism Pope Paul VITLM v NOEcone
« on: April 05, 2014, 06:57:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • GOD HIMSELF WILL OVERTHROW MODERNISM


    Judas Iscariot: We fear the Pope; only the fact of the matter is that we no longer have to fear him so much, because his Vatican is directed by the cardinals. The Pope is suffering constantly, but, in the final analysis, he can thus save more souls and accomplish more than we would like.

    Exorcist: Tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, nothing but the entire truth! Continue!

    J: What will happen is that God Himself will be obliged to turn everything around and overthrow Modernism. Everything will start again from where it used to be - with the good, traditional, old ways of the past - doing what must be done and what They up there wish (he points upward), not what humanity has created for itself.

    E: Continue, tell the truth, on behalf of the Blessed Virgin, nothing but the truth!

    J: If the Pope were not isolated and watched constantly on all sides, he would still have enough control for his words to reach the outside world. But during these last few months, it has become more terrible. Practically nothing reaches the public any more, and what he would still like to publish is immediately contradicted, modified, changed... to the point of falsification. It is falsified.

    No methods are too low for the cardinals to promulgate their notions throughout the world. Nothing is too low, for these, are the Last Times. If we were not steering them on this course and did not have the cardinals in our power as we have, then they would keep a better check on themselves. But as we are all rushing around busily, and so many masters of black magic are following in our tracks, we have the cardinals completely under our domination at the present time. The best thing for you to do is to pray a great deal to the Holy Spirit. As has already been said by myself and Akabor in regard to obedience, I Judas, have said it - it is now no longer obligatory to obey.



    PRUDENCE IN JUDGMENT



    Exorcist
    : In the name...!

    Beelzebub
    : There are some quite sincere people who believe that this comes from the Pope and who do not know of the existence of a double. Nor do they know that it is a sin to receive Communion in the hand. They do not wish to stand out from the crowd nor to be conspicuous; they do not know, for example, what is said in the book, “Warnings...”, or what has been said previously through authentic privileged souls, namely that Communion should not be taken in the hand; such people are not committing a serious sin; it is not their fault if the priest does things that way.

    And then, there is also this: in many churches, when people genuflect and wish to receive Communion in the mouth, they are made to feel unpopular as far as the priest is concerned. In that case also, the sin is not so serious. He up there (he points upward) judges each case individually. It cannot be said categorically that such a person will go to Hell because he receives Communion in the hand, when he does not know that this practice is not desired up there.

    These people act through obedience and believe that it comes from the Pope, because they do not know that there is a double and that there are some cardinals who are disloyal to the Pope. They go along under the banner of obedience. I want to say that if these Christians should happen to get hold of tracts coming from other genuinely privileged souls, or from priests, which warn them that they have no right and should not, and if they receive the interior light - which, when received certainly comes from On High - and if, in spite of everything, they do the opposite, saying to themselves: “It's all the same whether I receive Communion in the mouth or in the hand - it is of no importance”, then the situation is different. Then, naturally, it is a sin. That is what else we must tell you. It depends always on each individual case.

    The same thing applies to the Holy Mass. The Mass of Saint Pius V is considered by Those up there (he points upward), by Heaven, to the preferred Mass. But many priests should be told that they have no right to trouble (or upset) people by saying: “If there is no Mass of Saint Pius V, do not go at all... say a Mass for yourselves at home on your own”.

    This attitude is not good. In spite of everything, such a priest is not a good pastor (shepherd). For we have already said it on a previous occasion: It is a huge loss of graces, it is true, but the New Mass to the degree in which it is celebrated in all good faith and through obedience to the bishop, still brings nevertheless, many graces. Even if it does not have the plenitude of graces of the Mass of Saint Pius V, it brings some graces all the same. If people stay at home and believe that they only have to open up their missals, thus believing themselves to be better and superior to the rest, this is not good.

    There are also some “traditionalists” who exalt themselves above the modernists. Those up there do not want any of that. That is not the Spirit of On High (he points upward). They think in Heaven that this smacks of phariseeism, and no one has the right to be like that. She makes me say that there are also many “traditionalists” who are full of themselves... We do not wish to speak any more!


    ECÔNE WILL TRIUMPH IN SPITE OF EVERYTHING



    Beelzebub: Ah!... That cursed Ecône... it will conquer! We are scheming madly and doing everything that we can against it. But it has the only true Priesthood. We have to acknowledge that. It will conquer in spite of all the opposition and all the attacks. It will conquer! There would be no need to attack it, if it were not true and authentic. Whatever they do at Ecône should make no difference to the others who are always talking about solidarity and dialogue. (he sighs and breathes heavily). Why don't they leave him alone (Mgr. Lefebvre)? Why do they torment him like that? It comes about only because we want it, because we do not want the truth and because we fear that the Church may come to life again. We do not want the Church to prevail and to come to life again in order to become once more what it ought to be, and what They up there (he points upward) want it to be. We do not want that. That is why we have, in addition to our fury against Pope Paul VI, a mad fury against Archbishop Lefebvre. The second of our hatreds is directed against him. But, in the end, those two will conquer.




    The book essentially exposes the remarks and gestures made by a possessed woman in Switzerland during 1975‑1978. Speaking through the possessed woman, the demons were forced to tell the truth by Our Lady under the Solemn Church Exorcism, which was witnessed by the following priests who have all expressed their conviction of the authenticity of the revelations made by the demons upon the order of the Blessed Virgin.

    1. Abbot Albert‑l`Arx, Niederbuchorten

    2. Abbot Arnold Elig, Ramiswil

    3. Abbot Ernest Fischer, Missionary, Gossau (St.‑Gall).

    4. Rev. Father Pius Gervasi, O.S.B., Disentis

    5. Abbot Karl Holdener, Ried

    6. Rev. Father Gregoire Meyer, ‑ Trimbach

    7. Rev. Father Robert Rinderer, C.P.P.S., Auw

    8. Abbot Louis Veillard, Cerneux‑Pequignot

    All eight priests are Swiss, except Father E. Fischer, a German. All participated in the exorcisms except Father G. Meyer who was spiritual director of the possessed woman. Two other French priests also participated in the exorcisms.


    DECLARATION
     

    Some of the shepherds of the Church who ought to be protectors of the Faith and of the Truth are that no longer. That is why the Blessed Virgin Mary forces Satan -the father of lies - to tell the truth and to teach the pure doctrine of the Church, even while he fulminates against these Warnings. It is a question of waking the shepherds up and bringing about the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, the Mother of the Holy Church.

    It must be understood that all these communications should be compared with the authentic doctrine of the Church and with its present situation. But it is certain, here and now, that the contents of this book show the way towards a profound renewal of the Church.

    Reverend Father Arnold Renz




    DECLARATION

    THE UNDERSIGNED, DOCTOR MICHEL MOURET, CHIEF DOCTOR OF THE PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT OF THE LIMOUX HOSPITAL (AUDE), AFTER HAVING EXAMINED MRS. R.B. IN SWITZERLAND, AND HAVING BEEN PRESENT THIS DAY, APRIL 26, 1978, AT AN EXORCISM INVOLVING HER, IN THE PRESENCE OF FOUR PRIESTS, OF A DURATION OF THREE AND A HALF HOURS, DECLARE THAT IN THE TYPE OF MANIFESTATIONS PRESENTED BY THE SUBJECT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF EITHER A RAVING PSYCHOSIS, NOR OF AN HYSTERICAL PERSONALITY - TWO DIAGNOSES TO BE ELIMINATED IN THIS CASE. BUT HERE WAS EVIDENCE OF MEDIUMISTIC PHENOMENA THAT THE CHURCH IS ACCUSTOMED TO CALL POSSESSION, WHICH IS MORE OR LESS, TRANSITORY.

    Dr. Michael Gabriel Mouret